The effect of multimedia discrepancies on metacognitive judgments

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1276-1285

  Burkett, Candice ^a,c   Azevedo, Roger ^b  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrepancy detection; Judgment accuracy; Metacognitive judgments; Metacognitive monitoring; Multimedia; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX SCIENCE; JUDGMENT ACCURACY; METACOGNITIVES; MULTIMEDIA; MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS; MULTIMEDIA MATERIALS; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84860298063     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. S. Ainsworth The functions of multiple representations Computers & Education 33 1999 131 152
2. R. Azevedo, D. Moos, A.M. Johnson, and A. Chauncey Measuring cognitive and metacognitive processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges Educational Psychologist 45 4 2010 210 223
3. R. Azevedo, and A.M. Witherspoon Self-regulated use of hypermedia D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser, Handbook of metacognition in education 2009 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ 319 339
4. R. Azevedo, A. Witherspoon, A. Chauncey, and C. Burkett Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with metacognitive tools M.S. Khine, I.M. Saleh, New science of learning: Computers, cognition, and collaboration in education 2010 Springer Amsterdam 252 257
5. Britton, B. K., & Eisenhart, F. J., (1993). Expertise, text coherence and constraint satisfaction: Effects on harmony and setting rate. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 266-271). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
6. L. Callihan, and D. Callihan CLEP natural sciences 2009 Research & Education Association Piscataway, NJ
7. H.M. Cuevas, S.M. Fiore, and R.L. Oser Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments Instructional Science 30 2002 433 464
8. J. Dunlosky, J. Baker, K. Rawson, and C. Hertzog Does aging influence people's metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning Psychology & Aging 21 2006 390 400
9. J. Dunlosky, and R. Bjork Handbook of metamemory and memory 2008 Taylor & Francis NY
10. J. Dunlosky, C. Hertzog, M. Kennedy, and K. Thiede The self-monitoring approach for effective learning Cognitive Technology 10 2005 4 11
11. J. Dunlosky, and A.R. Lipko Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 2007 228 232
12. J. Dunlosky, and J. Metcalfe Metacognition: A textbook for cognitive, educational, life span and applied psychology 2009 Sage Newbury Park, CA
13. J. Dunlosky, and T.O. Nelson Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect Memory & Cognition 20 1992 373 380
14. B. Finn Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control Memory & Cognition 36 4 2008 813 821
15. A. Getis, J. Getis, and J. Fellman Introduction to geography 2009 McGraw Hill US
16. Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of US fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-001Revised). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.
17. A. Graesser, U. Shulan, B. Olde, E. Cooper-Pye, and S. Whitten Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down Memory & Cognition 33 7 2005 1235 1247
18. D. Halliday, R. Resnick, and J. Walker Fundamentals of physics 2008 Wiley US
19. M. Hoefnagels Biology: Concepts and investigations 2009 McGraw Hill US
20. K. Jackson, and W. Trochim Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses Organizational Research Methods 5 4 2002 307 336
21. A. Koriat, and M. Goldsmith Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy Psychological Review 103 1996 490 517
22. Lehman, B., D'Mello, S. K., & Person, N. (2008). All alone with your emotions: An analysis of student emotions during effortful problem solving activities. In Workshop on emotional and cognitive issues in ITS held in conjunction with ninth international conference on intelligent tutoring systems.
23. R.H. Maki Metacomprehension of text: Influence of absolute confidence level on bias and accuracy D.L. Medin, The psychology of learning and motivation 1998 Academic Press San Diego, CA 223 248
24. W. Masterson, and C. Hurley Chemistry: Principles and reactions 2006 Wadsworth US
25. R.E. Mayer Cognitive theory of multimedia learning R.E. Mayer, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005 Cambridge University Press NY
26. R.E. Mayer Multimedia learning 2nd ed. 2009 Cambridge University Press NY
27. J. Metcalfe Metacognitive judgments and control of study Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 2009 159 163
28. J. Metcalfe, and B. Finn Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 2008 1084 1097
29. J. Metcalfe, and N. Kornell A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation Journal of Memory and Language 52 2005 463 477
30. T.O. Nelson, and J. Dunlosky When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect" Psychological Science 2 1991 267 270
31. T.O. Nelson, and L. Narens Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings G.H. Bower, The psychology of learning and motivation 1990 Academic Press New York 125 173
32. J.C. Otero, and J.M. Companario Comprehension evaluation and regulation on learning from science texts Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 1990 447 460
33. J. Otero, and W. Kintsch Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read Psychological Science 3 1992 229 235
34. G. Paoletti When a chart is not worth ten thousand words: Integration problems in studying the text with figures Italian Journal of Education 1 2005 67 85
35. P. Pintrich The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, M. Zeidner, Handbook of self-regulation 2000 Academic Press San Diego, CA 451 502
36. Planty, M., Hussar, W., Snyder, T., Kena, G., KewalRamani, A., Kemp, J., et al. (2009). The condition of education 2009 (NCES 2009-081). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.
37. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Oraganisation for economic co-operation and development, PISA 2006 technical report 2006 OECD Paris
38. K. Rawson, and J. Dunlosky Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 2002 69 80
39. G.W. Ryan, and H.R. Bernard Data management and analysis methods N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research 2nd ed. 2000 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA 769 802
40. Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2007, May). Do beliefs about comprehension affect metacomprehension judgments? In Paper presented at the 79th annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
41. T. Seufert Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations Learning and Instruction 13 2003 227 237
42. Seufert, T. & Brünken, R. (2004). Supporting coherence formation in multimedia learning. In: P. Gerjets, P.A. Kirschner, J. Elen, & R. Joiner, (Eds.) Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs instructional design and learning and instruction with computers (pp. 138-147) (CD-ROM). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
43. SparkNotes Editors SAT subject test: Physics: Sparknotes test prep 2004 Spark Canada
44. SparkNotes Editors 10 practice exams for the SAT subject tests: Sparknotes test prep 2007 Spark Canada
45. J. Sweller Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning R. Mayer, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning 2005 Cambridge New York 19 31
46. K.W. Thiede, M.C.M. Anderson, and D. Therriault Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts Journal of Educational Psychology 95 1 2003 66 73
47. K.W. Thiede, and J. Dunlosky Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy at predicting their recognition performance Journal of Educational Psychology 2 1994 290 302
48. K.W. Thiede, T. Griffin, J. Wiley, and J. Redford Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A. Graesser, Handbook of metacognition in education 2009 Routledge New York 85 106
49. B. Tillery Physical science 2007 McGraw Hill US
50. Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (2003). Released set eighth grade science items. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
51. Winne, P. & Hadwin, A. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 297-314).
52. P.H. Winne A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self- regulated learning B.J. Zimmerman, D.H. Schunk, Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2011 Routledge New York 15 32
53. F.M. Zaromb, J.D. Karpicke, and H.L. Roediger Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: Effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 36 2 2010 552 557
54. Q. Zhao, and T. Linderholm Adult metacomprehension: Judgment processes and accuracy constraints Educational Psychology Review 20 2 2008 191 206
55. B. Zimmerman, and D. Schunk Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2011 Routledge New York