Familiarity and Retrieval Processes in Delayed Judgments of Learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1084-1097

  Metcalfe, Janet ^a   Finn, Bridgid ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals

Author keywords

cue familiarity; dual process model; judgments of learning; metacognition; target retrievability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; CULTURE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 55049085416     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0012580     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ashby F.G. A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44 (2000) 310-329
2. Begg I., Duft S., Lalonde P., Melnick R., and Sanvito J. Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28 (1989) 610-632
3. Benjamin A.S. Recognition memory and introspective remember/know judgments: Evidence for the influence of distractor plausibility on "remembering" and a caution about purportedly nonparametric measures. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 261-269
4. Benjamin A.S., and Bjork R.A. Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In: Reder L.M. (Ed). Implicit memory and metacognition: The 27th Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (1996), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 309-338
5. Benjamin A.S., Bjork R.A., and Schwartz B.L. The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (1998) 55-68
6. Butler A.C., and Roediger III H.L. Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (2007) 514-527
7. Dunlosky J., and Nelson T.O. Importance of the kind of cue for judgment of learning (JOL) and the delayed JOL effect. Memory & Cognition 20 (1992) 374-380
8. Dunlosky J., and Nelson T.O. Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language 36 (1997) 34-49
9. Dunlosky J., Rawson K.A., and Middleton E. What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 551-565
10. Finn, B. (in press). Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control. Memory & Cognition
11. Finn B., and Metcalfe J. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 33 (2007) 238-244
12. Finn B., and Metcalfe J. Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test. Journal of Memory and Language 58 (2008) 19-34
13. Glenberg A.M., Sanocki T., Epstein W., and Morris C. Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 (1987) 119-136
14. Karpicke J.D., and Roediger H.L. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 319 (2008) 966-968
15. Kelemen W.L., and Weaver C.A. Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23 (1997) 1394-1409
16. Kimball D.R., and Metcalfe J. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 918-929
17. Kolers P.A., and Palef S.R. Knowing not. Memory & Cognition 5 (1977) 553-558
18. Koriat A. Monitoring one's knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (1997) 349-370
19. Koriat A., and Bjork R.A. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 187-194
20. Luce R.D. Response times (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
21. McDaniel M.A., and Fisher R.P. Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology 16 (1991) 192-201
22. McDaniel M.A., Kowitz M.D., and Dunay P.K. Altering memory through recall: The effects of cue-guided retrieval processing. Memory & Cognition 17 (1989) 423-434
23. McDaniel M.A., and Masson M.E.J. Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11 (1985) 371-385
24. Metcalfe J., and Finn B. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15 (2008) 174-179
25. Nelson T.O., and Dunlosky J. When people's judgments of learning (JOL) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The delayed-JOL effect. Psychological Science 2 (1991) 267-270
26. Nelson T.O., and Dunlosky J. How shall we explain the delayed-judgment-of- learning effect?. Psychological Science 3 (1992) 317-318
27. Nelson T.O., Dunlosky J., Graf A., and Narens L. Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multi-trial learning. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 207-213
28. Nelson T.O., Narens L., and Dunlosky J. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods 9 (2004) 53-69
29. Pashler H., Cepeda N.J., Wixted J.T., and Rohrer D. When does feedback facilitate learning of words?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 3-8
30. Pashler H., Zarow G., and Triplett B. Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (2003) 1051-1057
31. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85 (1978) 59-108
32. Ratcliff R., Van Zandt T., and McKoon G. Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review 106 (1999) 261-300
33. Reber P.J., Alvarez P., and Squire L.R. Reaction time distributions across normal forgetting: Searching for markers of memory consolidation. Learning and Memory 4 (1997) 284-290
34. Roediger III H.L., and Karpicke J.D. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 249-255
35. Roediger III H.L., Weldon M.S., and Challis B.H. Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In: Roediger H.L., and Craik F.I.M. (Eds). Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 3-39
36. Son L.K., and Metcalfe J. Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage model. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 1116-1129
37. Spellman B.A., and Bjork R.A. When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science 3 (1992) 315-316
38. Weaver III C.A., and Kelemen W.L. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: Evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (2003) 1058-1065
39. Whitten W.B., and Bjork R.A. Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16 (1977) 465-478