Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: Hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales

American Naturalist

Volumn 149, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 295-315

  Campbell, Diane R ^a,b   Waser, Nickolas M ^b,c   Meléndez Ackerman, Elvia J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAWKMOTH; HUMMINGBIRD; HYBRID ZONE; POLLINATOR-MEDIATED SELECTION;

IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA; IPOMOPSIS TENUITUBA; LEPIDOPTERA; POLEMONIACEAE; SPHINGIDAE; TROCHILIDAE;

EID: 0030618131     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/285991     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Armbruster, W. S. 1990. Estimating and testing the shapes of adaptive surfaces: the morphology and pollination of Dalenchampia blossoms. American Naturalist 135:14-31.
2. Arnold, M. L., and B. D. Bennett. 1993. Natural hybridization in Louisiana irises: genetic variation and ecological determinants. Pages 115-139 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Arnold, M. L., and S. A. Hodges. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:67-71.
4. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
5. Barton, N. H., and B. O. Bengtsson. 1986. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity 57:357-376.
6. Barton, N. H., and K. S. Gale. 1993. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. Pages 13-45 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43:318-334.
8. -. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. American Naturalist 137:713-737.
9. -. 1996. Evolution of floral traits in a hermaphroditic plant: field measurements of heritabilities and genetic correlations. Evolution 50:1442-1453.
10. Campbell, D. R., and K. J. Halama. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:1043-1051.
11. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, M. V. Price, E. A. Lynch, and R. J. Mitchell. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45:1458-1467.
12. Campbell, D. R., N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price. 19%. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 77:1463-1472.
13. Chase, V. C., and P. H. Raven. 1975. Evolutionary and ecological relationships between Aquilegia formosa and A. pubescens (Ranunculaceae), two perennial plants. Evolution 29:474-486.
14. Cruzan, M. B., and M. L. Arnold. 1993. Ecological and genetic associations in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 47:1432-1445.
15. Elam, D. R., and Y. B. Linhart. 1988. Pollination and seed production in Ipomopsis aggregata: differences among and within flower color morphs. American Journal of Botany 75: 1262-1274.
16. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographical variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
17. Galen, C., K. A. Zimmer, and M. E. Newport. 1987. Pollination in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum: a mechanism for disruptive selection on flower size. Evolution 41:599-606.
18. Goodnight, C. J., J. M. Schwartz, and L. Stevens. 1992. Contextual analysis of models of group selection, soft selection, hard selection, and the evolution of altruism. American Naturalist 140:743-761.
19. Grant, V. 1949. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution 3:82-97.
20. -. 1993. Effects of hybridization and selection on floral isolation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90:990-993.
21. Grant, V., and K. A. Grant. 1965. Flower pollination in the phlox family. Columbia University Press, New York.
22. Grant, V., and E. J. Temeles. 1992. Foraging ability of rufous hummingbirds on hummingbird flowers and hawkmoth flowers. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89: 9400-9404.
23. Grant, V., and D. H. Wilken. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette 149:213-221.
24. Hainsworth, F. R., L. L. Wolf, and T. Mercier. 1985. Pollen limitation in a monocarpic species, Ipomopsis aggregata. Journal of Ecology 73:263-270.
25. Harrison, R. G., ed. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Heisler, I. L., and J. Damuth. 1987. A method for analyzing selection in hierarchically structured populations. American Naturalist 130:582-602.
27. Hewitt, G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones: natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 3:158-167.
28. Heywood, J. S. 1986. Clinal variation associated with edaphic ecotones in hybrid populations of Gaillardia pulchella. Evolution 40:1132-1140.
29. Knobloch, I. W. 1972. Intergeneric hybridization in flowering plants. Taxon 21:97-103.
30. Kocher, T. D., and R. D. Sage. 1986. Further genetic analyses of a hybrid zone between leopard frogs (Rana pipiens complex) in central Texas. Evolution 40:21-33.
31. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
32. Levin, D. A., and K. P. Schmidt. 1985. Dynamics of a hybrid zone in Phlox: an experimental demographic investigation. American Journal of Botany 72:1404-1409.
33. Meléndez, E. J. 1995. Selection on flower color in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Ph.D. diss. University of California, Irvine.
34. Meléndez-Ackerman, E. J. 19%. Patterns of color and nectar variation across an hybrid zone. American Journal of Botany (in press).
35. Mitchell, R. J. 1992. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modelling. Functional Ecology 6:123-129.
36. -. 1993. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: observation and experiment in the field. Evolution 47:25-35.
37. Mitchell, W. A. 1989. Informational constraints on optimally foraging hummingbirds. Oikos 55: 145-154.
38. Moore, W. S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quarterly Review of Biology 52:263-278.
39. Paige, K. N., and T. G. Whitham. 1985. Individual and population shifts in flower color by scarlet gilia: a mechanism for pollinator tracking. Science (Washington, D.C.) 227:315-317.
40. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222.
41. Pyke, G. H. 1978. Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: testing the marginal value theorem. American Zoologist 18:739-752.
42. Rieseberg, L. H., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12:213-241.
43. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6.04 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
44. Slatkin, M. 1973. Gene flow and selection in a cline. Genetics 75:733-756.
45. Stebbins, G. L. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proceedings of American Philosophical Society 103:231-251.
46. Stevens, L., C. J. Goodnight, and S. Kalisz. 1995. Multilevel selection in natural populations of Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 145:513-526.
47. Straw, R. M. 1955. Floral isolation of Penstemon. American Naturalist 90:47-50.
48. Waser, N. M. 1983. The adaptive nature of floral traits: ideas and evidence. Pages 241-285 in L. Real, ed. Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
49. Wilken, D. 1982. A simple method for estimating anthocyanin concentration in tissue extracts. Phyto-chemical Bulletin 15:7-13.
50. Wolf, L. L., F. R. Hainsworth, and F. B. Gill. 1975. Foraging efficiencies and time budgets in nectar-feeding birds. Ecology 56:117-128.
51. Wolf, P. G., and D. R. Campbell. 1995. Hierarchical analysis of allozymic and morphometric variation in a montane herb, Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Journal of Heredity 86:386-394.