Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): Phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 642-650

  Maad, J ^a,b   Alexandersson, R ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Drought stress; Hawkmoth pollination; Male function hypothesis; Orchids; Phenotypic selection; Plant reproduction; Pollen limitation; Resource limitation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; HERMAPHRODITE; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; ORCHIDACEAE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SWEDEN; WEATHER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FLOWERS; ORCHIDACEAE; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SWEDEN; WEATHER;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; ORCHIDACEAE; PLATANTHERA;

EID: 2342576369     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00703.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ackerman, J.D. & Montalvo, A.M. 1990. Short- and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology 71: 263-272.
2. Alexandersson, R. & Johnson, S.D. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 631-636.
3. Bell G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224: 223-265.
4. Bennington, C.C. & McGraw, J.B. 1995. Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 303-323.
5. Brodie, E.D.I., Moore, A.J. & Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313-318.
6. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev. 60: 83-139.
7. Burd, M. & Callahan, H.S. 2000. What does the male function hypothesis claim? J. Evol. Biol. 13: 735-742.
8. Campbell D.R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution 43: 318-334.
9. Campbell, D.R. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am. Nat. 137: 713-737.
10. Campbell, D.R. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 227-232.
11. Caruso, C.M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 1546-1557.
12. Caruso, C.M. 2001. Differing selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata growing in contrasting environments. Oikos 94: 295-302.
13. Conover, W.J. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. Crowley, P.H. 1992. Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 405-447.
15. Darwin, C. 1862. On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects. John Murray, London.
16. Davies, P., Davies, J. & Huxley, A. 1983. Wild Orchids of Britain and Europe. Chatto & Windas, the Hogarth Press, London.
17. Dixon, P.M. 1993. The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments (S. M. Scheiner & J. Gurevitch, eds), pp. 290-318. Chapman & Hall, New York.
18. Donnelly, S.E., Lortie, C.J. & Aarssen, L.W. 1998. Pollination in Verbascum thapsus (Scrophulariaceae): the advantage of being tall. Am. J. Bot. 85: 1618-1625.
19. Dudash, M.R. 1991. Plant size effects on female and male function in hermaphroditic Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology 72: 1004-1012.
20. Eckhart, V.M. 1991. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations of Phacelia linearis (Hydriphyllaceae). Evol. Ecol. 5: 370-384.
21. Eckhart, V.M. & Chapin, F.S., III 1997. Nutrient sensitivity of the cost of male function in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84: 1092-1098.
22. Ehrlén, J. 2002. Associating the lifetime consequences of plant-animal interactions for the perennial herb Lathyrus vernus (Fabaceae). Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 5: 145-163.
23. Ehrlén, J. & Eriksson, O. 1995. Pollen limitation and population growth in a herbaceous perennial legume. Ecology 76: 652-656.
24. Ehrlén, J., Käck, S. & Ågren, J. 2002. Pollen limitation, seed predation and scape length in Primula farinosa. Oikos 97: 45-51.
25. Elle, E. 1999. Sex allocation and reproductive success in the andromonoedous perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). I. Female success. Am. J. Bot. 86: 278-286.
26. Elle, E. & Meagher, T.R. 2000. Sex allocation and reproductive success in the andromonoecious perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). II. Paternity and functional gender. Am. Nat. 156: 622-636.
27. Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
28. Fritz, A.-L. & Nilsson, L.A. 1996. Reproductive success and gender variation in deceit-pollinated orchids. In: Floral Biology (D. G. Lloyd & S. C. Barrett, eds), pp. 319-338. Chapman & Hall, New York.
29. Galen, C. 2000. High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs, and selection on flower size in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am. Nat. 156: 72-83.
30. Gómez, J.M. 2000. Phenotypic selection and response to selection in Lobularia maritima: importance of direct and correlational components of natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 689-699.
31. Gómez, J.M. & Zamora, R. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Am. Nat. 155: 657-668.
32. Hautekeete, N.C., Piqout, Y. & Van Dijk, H. 2001. Investment in survival and reproduction along a semelparity-iteroparity gradient of the Beta species complex. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 795-804.
33. Herrera, C.M. 1993, Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 251-275.
34. Herrera, C.M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81: 2170-2176.
35. Herrera, C.M., Medrano, M., Rey, P.J., Sanches-Lafuente, A.M., García, M.B., Guitan, J. & Manzaneda, A.J. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualisms- and antagonism-related traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 16823-16828.
36. Hultén, E. & Fries, M. 1986. Atlas of North European Vascular Plants North of the Tropic of Cancer. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
37. Janzen, D.H. 1977. A note on optimal mate selection by plants. Am. Nat. 111: 365-371.
38. Johnson, S.D. 1996. Pollination, adaptation and speciation models in the Cape flora of South Africa. Taxon 45: 59-66.
39. Johnston, M. O. 1991. Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Lobelia with different pollinators. Evolution 45: 1468-1479.
40. Kalisz, S. 1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40: 479-491.
41. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
42. Maad, J. 2000. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 54: 112-123.
43. Mattila, E. & Kuitunen, M.T. 2000. Nutrient versus pollination limitation in Platanthera bifolia and Dactylorhiza incarnata (Orchidaceae). Oikos 89: 360-366.
44. Nilsson, L.A. 1983. Processes of isolation and introgressive interplay between Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich, and P. chlorantha (Custer) Reichb. (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 325-350.
45. Nilsson, L.A. 1985. Characteristics and distribution of intermediates between Platanthera bifolia and P. chlorantha (Orchidaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 5: 407-419.
46. Nilsson, L.A. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334: 147-149.
47. Ollerton, J. & Lack, A. 1998. Relationships between flowering phenology, plant size and reproductive success in Lotus cornitulatus (Fabaceae). Plant Ecol. 139: 35-47.
48. Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43: 1209-1222.
49. Queller, D. 1997. Pollen removal, paternity, and the male function of flowers. Am. Nat. 149: 585-594.
50. Schemske, D.W. & Horvitz, C.C. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution 43: 461-465.
51. Sinervo, B. & Svensson, E. 2002. Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity 89: 329-338.
52. SMHI. 1993. Väder och vatten, Juli. SMHI, Norrköping.
53. SMHI. 1994. Väder och vatten, Juli. SMHI, Norrköping.
54. SMHI. 1995. Väder och vatten, Juli. SMHI, Norrköping.
55. SMHI. 1997. Väder och vatten, Juli. SMHI, Norrköping.
56. Stanton, M.L. 1994. Male-male competition during pollination in plant populations. Am. Nat. 144: S40-S68.
57. Stanton, M., Young, H.J., Ellstrand, N.C. & Clegg, J.M. 1991. Consequences of floral variation for male and female reproduction in experimental populations of wild radish, Raphanus sativus L. Evolution 45: 268-280.
58. Stanton, M.L., Roy, B.A. & Thiede, D.A. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments. 1. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54: 93-111.
59. Steiner, K.E. & Whitehead, V.B. 1990. Pollinator adaption to oil-secreting flowers-Rediviva and Diascia. Evolution 44: 1701-1707.
60. Sutherland, S. & Delph, L.F. 1984. On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit set. Ecology 65: 1093-1104.
61. Thomson, J.D. 2001. Using pollination deficits to infer pollinator declines: can theory guide us? Conserv. Ecol. 5. [www document]. URL http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art6
62. Totland, Ø. 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology 82: 2233-2244.
63. Totland, Ø. & Eide, W. 1999. Environmentally-dependent pollen limitation on seed production in alpine Ranunculus acris. Ecoscience 6: 173-179.
64. Willems, J.H. & Borland, E. 2000. Flowering frequency and plant performance and their relation to age in the perennial orchid Spiranthers spiralis (L.) Chevall. Plant Biol. 1: 344-349.
65. Willson, M.F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 777-790.
66. Wilson, P. 1995. Variation in intensity of pollination in Drosera tracyi: selection is strongest when resources are intermediate. Evol. Ecol. 9: 382-396.
67. Wilson, P., Thomson, J.D., Stanton, M.L. & Rigney, L.P. 1994. Beyond floral batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 143: 283-296.
68. Young, H.J. & Stanton, M. 1990. Influence of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71: 536-547.
69. Zhang, D.Y. & Wang, G. 1994. Evolutionary stable reproductive strategies in sexual organisms: an integrated approach to life-history evolution and sex allocation. Am. Nat. 144: 65-75.