The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 267, Issue 1441, 2000, Pages 315-320

  Harder, Lawrence D ^a   Barrett, Spencer C H ^b   Cole, William W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dichogamy; Geitonogamous self pollination; Inflorescence design; Monoecy; Outcross siring success; Pollen discounting

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING PLANT; SELFING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ARTICLE; BEE; HERMAPHRODITISM; MATING; PLANT; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENTIATION; SEXUAL FUNCTION;

APOIDEA; BOMBUS (GENUS); EICHHORNIA PANICULATA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 0034701107     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aizen, M. A. & Basilio, A. 1998 Sex differential nectar secretion in protandrous Alstroemeria aurea (Alstroemeriaceae): is production altered by pollen removal and receipt? Am. J. Bot. 85, 245-252.
2. Barrett, S. C. H., Harder, L. D. & Cole, W. W. 1994 Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilization in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 8, 526-535.
3. Bawa, K. S. & Beach, J. H. 1981 Evolution of sexual systems in flowering plants. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 68, 254-274.
4. Bell, S. A. & Cresswell, J. E. 1998 The phenology of gender in homogamous flowers: temporal change in the residual sex function of flowers of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Funct. Ecol. 12, 298-306.
5. Bertin, R. I. 1993 Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 80, 557-583.
6. Bertin, R. I. & Newman, C. M. 1993 Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59, 112-152.
7. Brunet, J. & Charlesworth, D. 1995 Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49, 70-79.
8. Charnov, E. L. 1982 The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press.
9. Cruzan, M. B. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1993 Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47, 925-934.
10. Darwin, C. R. 1877 The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects, 2nd edn. London: John Murray.
11. Harder, L. D. 2000 Pollen dispersal and the floral diversity of monocotyledons. In Monocots. II. The characteristics, classification and relationships of monocotyledons (ed. K. L. Wilson & D. Morrison), pp. 241-255. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
12. Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1995 Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373, 512-515.
13. Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1996 Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants (ed. D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett), pp. 140-190. New York: Chapman & Hall.
14. Harder, L. D. & Thomson, J. D. 1989 Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Am. Nat. 133, 323-344.
15. Harder, L. D. & Wilson, W. G. 1998 A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating-system evolution. Am. Nat. 152, 684-695.
16. Jennrich, R. I. & Schluchter, M. D. 1986 Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices. Biometrics 42, 805-820.
17. Lloyd, D. G. 1988 Benefits and costs of biparental and uniparental reproduction in plants. In The evolution of sex (ed. R. E. Michod & B. R. Levin), pp. 233-252. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
18. Lloyd, D. G. 1992 Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153, 370-380.
19. Lloyd, D. G. & Bawa, K. S. 1984 Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evol. Biol. 17, 255-338.
20. Lloyd, D. G. & Webb, C. J. 1986 The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. NZJ. Bot. 24, 135-162.
21. Lloyd, D. G. & Yates, J. M. A. 1982 Intrasexual selection and the segregation of pollen and stigmas in hermaphrodite plants, exemplified by Wahlenbergia albomarginata (Campanulaceae). Evolution 36, 903-913.
22. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. 1989 Generalized linear models, 2nd edition. London: Chapman & Hall.
23. McKone, M. J., Ostertag, R., Rausher, J. T., Heiser. D. A. & Russell, F. L. 1995 An exception to Darwin's syndrome: floral position, protogyny, and insect visitation in Besseya bullii (Scrophulariaceae). Oecologia 101, 68-74.
24. Morgan, M. T. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1989 Reproductive correlates of mating system variation in Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 2, 183-203.
25. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. & Wasserman, W. 1996 Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. Chicago, IL: Irwin.
26. Proctor, M., Yeo, P. & Lack, A. 1996 The natural history of pollination. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
27. Richards, A. J. 1997 Plant breeding systems, 2nd edn. London: Chapman & Hall.
28. Ritland, K. 1990 A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J. Hered. 81, 235-237.
29. SAS Institute, Inc. 1998 SAS Online Doc, v. 7.0. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Inc.
30. Toppings, P. 1989 The significance of inbreeding depression to the evolution of self-fertilization in Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). MSc thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
31. Wasson, K. & Newberry, A. T. 1997 Modular metazoans: gonochoric, hermaphroditic, or both at once? Invert. Reprod. Dev. 31, 159-175.
32. Webb, C. J. & Lloyd, D. G. 1986 The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. NZJ. Bot. 24, 163-178.
33. Willson, M. F. 1983 Plant reproductive ecology. New York: Wiley.