Students' consent to a teacher's pedagogical authority

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 403-424

  Harjunen, Elina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Consent to authority; Pattern of empowerment; Pedagogical authority; Student demands; Techniques

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960631838     PISSN: 00313831     EISSN: 14701170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2011.587325     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Barnard, C. (1950). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
3. Bochenski, J. (1974). Was ist Autorität? Einführung in die Logik der Autorität [What is authority? Introduction to the logic of authority]. Freiburg, Germany: Verlag Herder KG.
4. Bollnow, O.F. (1981). Der begriff des pädagogischen bezug bei Herman Nohl [The concept of pedagogical content in Herman Nohl]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 27(1), 31-37.
5. Bollnow, O.F. (1989). The pedagogical atmosphere (M. van Manen, W. Moses, & P. Mueller, Ed. & Trans.). Phenomenology & Pedagogy, 7, 5-63. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com
6. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture, (1st ed.). London: Sage.
7. Burbules, N.C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. Advances in contemporary educational thought (Vol. 10). New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Burch, R. (1991). Phenomenology and human science considered. Phenomenology & Pedagogy, 9, 27-69, Retrieved February 12, 2007, from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com
9. Byman, R., & Kansanen, P. (2008). Pedagogical thinking in a student's mind: A conceptual clarification on the basis of self-determination and volition theories. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6), 603-621.
10. Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211-217.
11. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
12. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
13. Flitner, W. (1957). Allgemeine pädagogik [General pedagogy] (5th ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett Verlag.
14. Foray, P. (2007). Autorität in der schule-Überlegungen zu ihrer systematik im lichte der franzö-sischen eriehungsphilosophie [Authority in school-reflections on ist systematics in the light of French educational philosophy]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 53(5), 615-625.
15. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
16. Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword: The subject and power. In H.L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. With an afterword by Michel Foucault (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Foucault, M. (2000). Tarkkailla ja rangaista [Discipline and punish] (2th ed.). Helsinki: Keuruu.
18. Gallagher, M. (2008). Foucault, power, and participation. International Journal of Children's Rights, 16, 395-406.
19. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychologist theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Harjunen, E. (2002). Miten opettaja rakentaa pedagogisen auktoriteetin? Otteita opettajan arjesta. [How does a teacher construct pedagogical authority Extracts from a teacher's everyday life]. Turku, Finland: Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Seura.
21. Harjunen, E. (2009). How do teachers view their own pedagogical authority? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 87-107.
22. Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Starting a dialogue: A beginning conversation between didaktik and the curriculum tradition. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition (pp. 3-11). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Kansanen, P. (1999). Teaching as teaching-studying-learning interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(1), 81-89.
24. Kansanen, P., & Meri, M. (1999). The didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. TNTEE Publications, 2(1), 107-116.
25. Kearney, P., & Plax, T.G. (1992). Student resistance to control. In V.P. Richmond & J.C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control and concern (pp. 85-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Klafki, W. (1970). Das pädagogische Verhältnis [The pedagogical relation]. In W. Klafki et al. (Eds.), Erziehungswissenschaft 1. Eine Einführung [Educational science 1. Introduction] (pp. 53-91). Weinheim, Germany: Fischer Taschenbuch.
27. Krippendorff, K. (1986). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (6th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Langeveld, M.J. (1951). Einführung in die pädagogik. Stuttgart, Germany: Ernst Klett.
29. Langeveld, M.J. (1988). The scientific nature of pedagogy, (M. van Manen, Ed. & Trans.). Retrieved April 11, 2002, from http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/po/articles/template.cfm?ID=338
30. Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Applied Research Methods Series (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. McLaughlin, H.J. (1991). Reconciling care and control: Authority in classroom relationships. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 182-195.
32. Meri, M. (1998). Ole oma itsesi: Reseptologinen näkökulma hyvään opetukseen [Be yourself: A receptological perspective to good teaching]. (Tutkimuksia No. 194). Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston opettajankoulutuslaitos.
33. Metz, M.H. (1978). Classroom and corridors: The crisis of authority in desegregated secondary schools. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34. Mitchell, D.E., & Spady, W.G. (1983). Authority, power, and the legitimation of social control. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(1), 5-33.
35. Nohl, H. (1988). Die pädagogische bewegung in Deutschland und ihre theorie [The pedagogical movement in Germany and its theory] (10th ed.). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Vittorio Klostermann.
36. Pace, J.L., & Hemmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in the classroom: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 4-27.
37. Peters, R.S. (1983). Authority, responsibility, and education, (rev. ed.). London: George Allen & Unwin.
38. Reichenbach, R. (2007). Kaschhierte dominanz-eichte unterwertung. Bemerkungen zur Subtilisierung der pädagogishen Autorität [Concealed dominance-easy subjucation. Remarks on the growing subtlety of pedagogical authority]. Zeitschrift fur Pädagogik, 53(5), 651-659.
39. Richmond, V.P., & McCroskey, J.C. (1992). Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Salo, M. (2004). Kasvatuksellinen realitettiperiaate: Välitätkö auktoriteettia vai väärää syyllisyyttä? [The educational reality principle: Do you communicate authority or guilt?]. (Tutkimuksia No 194). Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston Kasvatustieteen laitos.
41. Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Spady, W., & Mitchell, D. (1979). Authority and the management of classroom activities. The 78th Yearbook of the NSSE (pp. 75-115). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43. Spranger, E. (1965). Der geborene erzieher [Natural-born educator] (4th ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Quelle & Meyer.
44. Staton, A.Q. (1992). Teacher and student concern and classroom power and control. In V.P. Richmond & J.C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classrom: Communication, control and concern (pp. 159-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
45. Strauss, A. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, processes, contexts, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
47. Tirri, K., & Puolimatka, T. (2000). Teacher authority in schools: A case study. Journal of Education of Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 26(2), 157-165.
48. van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49. van Manen, M. (1994). Pedagogy, virtue, and narrative identity in teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 135-170.
50. van Manen, M. (1996). Phenomenological pedagogy and the question of meaning. In D. Vanderberg (Ed.), Phenomenology and educational discourse (pp. 39-64). Durban: Heinemann Higher and Further Education.
51. Vikainen, I. (1984). Pedagoginen auktoriteetti [Pedagogical authority.] Turku, Finland: Turun yliopiston kasvatustieteiden laitos.
52. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
53. Ziehe, T. (1992). Uusi nuoriso. Epätavanomaisen oppimisen puolustus [New Youth: A defence of unusual learning] (R. Sironen & J. Tuormaa, Trans). Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.