Taking advantage of the use of supervised learning methods for characterization of sperm population structure related with freezability in the Iberian red deer

Theriogenology

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1661-1672

  Ramon M ^a,b   Martinez Pastor F ^c   Garcia Alvarez O ^d   Maroto Morales, A ^a   Soler, A Josefa ^a   Jimenez Rabadan P ^d   Fernández Santos, M Rocío ^a   Bernabeu R ^e   Garde, J Julián ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN RECURSOS CINEGÉTICOS IREC CSIC UCLM JCCM   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

^d CERSYRA   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Iberian red deer; Sperm freezability; Sperm subpopulations; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOLOGY; DEER; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CRYOPRESERVATION; DEER; MALE; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL, MITOCHONDRIAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

CERVUS ELAPHUS;

EID: 84859436245     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Petrunkina A.M., Töpfer-Petersen E. Heterogeneous osmotic behaviour in boar sperm populations and its relevance for detection of changes in plasma membrane. Reprod Fertil Dev 2000, 12:297-305.
2. Paasch U., Grunewald S., Fitzl G., Glander H.J. Deterioration of plasma membrane is associated with activated caspases in human spermatozoa. J Androl 2003, 24:246-252.
3. Pérez-Llano B., Yenes-García P., García-Casado P. Four subpopulations of boar spermatozoa defined according to their response to the short hypoosmotic swelling test and acrosome status during incubation at 37 degrees C. Theriogenology 2003, 60:1401-1407.
4. Buffone M.G., Doncel G.F., Marín Briggiler C.I., Vazquez-Levin M.H., Calamera J.C. Human sperm subpopulations: relationship between functional quality and protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Hum Reprod 2004, 19:139-146.
5. Esteso M.C., Soler A.J., Fernández-Santos M.R., Quintero-Moreno A.A., Garde J.J. Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples. J Androl 2006, 27:662-670.
6. Núñez-Martínez I., Moran J.M., Peña F.J. A three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulations in canine ejaculates: changes after cryopreservation. Reprod Domest Anim 2006, 41:408-415.
7. Martínez-Pastor F., Cabrita E., Soares F., Anel L., Dinis M.T. Multivariate cluster analysis to study motility activation of Solea senegalensis spermatozoa: a model for marine teleosts. Reproduction 2008, 135:449-459.
8. Druart X., Gatti J.L., Huet S., Dacheux J.L., Humblot P. Hypotonic resistance of boar spermatozoa: sperm subpopulations and relationship with epididymal maturation and fertility. Reproduction 2009, 137:205-213.
9. Muiño R., Peña A.I., Rodríguez A., Tamargo C., Hidalgo C.O. Effects of cryopreservation on the motile sperm subpopulations in semen from asturiana de los Valles bulls. Theriogenology 2009, 72:860-868.
10. Harrison R.A. Capacitation mechanisms, and the role of capacitation as seen in eutherian mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev 1996, 8:581-594.
11. Petrunkina A.M., Waberski D., Günzel-Apel A.R., Töpfer-Petersen E. Determinants of sperm quality and fertility in domestic species. Reproduction 2007, 134:3-17.
12. Martinez-Pastor F., Garcia-Macias V., Alvarez M., Herraez P., Anel L., de Paz P. Sperm subpopulations in Iberian Red deer epididymal sperm and their changes through the cryopreservation process. Biol Reprod 2005, 72:316-327.
13. Asher G.W., Berg D.K., Evans G. Storage of semen and artificial insemination in deer. Anim Reprod Sci 2000, 62:195-211.
14. Holt W.V. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology 2000, 53:47-58.
15. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Holt W.V. Sperm cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation. Cryo Lett 2002, 23:255-262.
16. Soler A.J., García A.J., Fernández-Santos M.R., Esteso M.C., Garde J.J. Effects of thawing procedure on postthawed in vitro viability and in vivo fertility of red deer epididymal spermatozoa cryopreserved at -196 degrees C. J Androl 2003, 24:746-756.
17. Martínez-Pastor F., Tizado E.J., Garde J.J., Anel L., de Paz P. Statistical Series: Opportunities and challenges of sperm motility subpopulation analysis. Theriogenology 2011, 75:783-795.
18. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction, second edition. Springer Series in Statistics 2009.
19. Weinberger K.Q., Saul L.K. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. J Machine Learn Res 2009, 10:207-244.
20. Perlich C., Provost F., Simonoff J.S. Tree induction vs. logistic regression: a learning curve analysis. The J Machine Learn Reseach 2003, 4:211-255.
21. Esmeir S., Markovitch S. Anytime learning of decision trees. J Machine Learn Res 2007, 8. 981-33.
22. Scheinberg K. An efficient implementation of an active set method for SVMs. J Machine Learn Res 2006, 7:2237-2257.
23. Ripley B.D. Pattern recognition and neural networks 2008, Cambridge University Press.
24. Noble W.S. What is a support vector machine?. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:1565-1567.
25. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support Vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Noble W.S. Support vector machine applications in computational biology. Kernel methods in computational biology 2004, 92. MIT Press, MA, Cambridge, p. 71. B. Schoelkopf, K. Tsuda, J.P. Vert (Eds.).
27. Liao L., Noble W.S. Combining pairwise sequence similarity and support vector machines for remote protein homology detection. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology 2002, 225-232.
28. Leslie C., Kuang R. Fast string kernels using inexact matching for protein sequences. J Machine Learn Res 2004, 5:1435-1455.
29. Vert J.P. A tree kernel to analyze phylogenetic profiles. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:276-284.
30. Leslie C.S., Eskin E., Cohen A., Weston J., Noble W.S. Mismatch string kernels for discriminative protein classification. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:467-476.
31. Brown M.P., Grundy W.N., Lin D., Cristianini N., Sugnet C.W., Furey T.S., et al. Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97:262-267.
32. Golub T.R., Slonim D.K., Tamayo P., Huard C., Gaasenbeek M., Mesirov J.P., et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999, 286:531-537.
33. Guyon I., Weston J., Barnhill S., Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 2002, 46:389-422.
34. García A.J., Landete-Castillejos T., Garde J.J., Gallego L. Reproductive seasonality in female Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Theriogenology 2002, 58:1553-1562.
35. Garde J.J., Ortiz N., García A.J., Gallego L., Landete-Castillejos T., López A. Postmortem assessment of sperm characteristics of the red deer during the breading season. Arch Andol 1998, 41:195-202.
36. Comizzoli P., Mauget R., Mermillod P. Assessment of in vitro fertility of deer spermatozoa by heterologous IVF with zona-free bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 2001, 56:261-274.
37. Martínez-Pastor F., Fernández-Santos M.R., Del Olmo E., Domínguez-Rebolledo A.E., Esteso M.C., Montoro V., et al. Mitochondrial activity and forward scatter vary in necrotic, apoptotic and membrane-intact spermatozoan subpopulations. Reprod Fertil Dev 2008, 20:547-556.
38. Martínez-Pastor F., Martínez F., Alvarez M., Maroto-Morales A., García-Alvarez O., Soler A.J., et al. Cryopreservation of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) spermatozoa obtained by electroejaculation. Theriogenology 2009, 71:628-638.
39. Silhouettes R.P.J. A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 1987, 20:53-65.
40. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R 2010, R Development Core Team, Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
41. Haldiki M., Batistakis Y., Vazirgiannis M. Cluster validity methods, SIGMOD. Record 2002, 31:40-45.
42. Goodson S.G., Zhang Z., Tsuruta J.K., Wang W., O'Brien D.A. Classification of mouse sperm motility patterns using an automated multiclass support vector machines model. Biol Reprod 2011, 84:1207-1215.
43. Dimitriadou E., Hornik K., Leisch F., Meyer D., Weingessel A. e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics (e1071), TU Wien. R package version 1.5-22. 2009 accessed: June, 2011. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071.
44. A library for support vector machines LIBSVM, accessed: June, 2011. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
45. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J Androl 2001, 22:382-394.
46. Cremades T., Roca J., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Abaigar T., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Kinematic changes during the cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa. J Androl 2005, 26:610-618.
47. Martinez-Pastor F., Diaz-Corujo A.R., Anel E., Herraez P., Anel L., de Paz P. Post mortem time and season alter subpopulation characteristics of Iberian red deer epididymal sperm. Theriogenology 2005, 64:958-974.
48. Beirão J., Cabrita E., Pérez-Cerezales S., Martínez-Páramo S., Herráez M.P. Effect of cryopreservation on fish sperm subpopulations. Cryobiology 2011, 62:22-31.
49. Dorado J., Alcaráz L., Duarte N., Portero J.M., Acha D., Hidalgo M. Changes in the structures of motile sperm subpopulations in dog spermatozoa after both cryopreservation and centrifugation on PureSperm(®) gradient. Anim Reprod Sci 2011, 125:211-218.
50. Holt W.V. Can we predict fertility rates?. Making sense of sperm motility. Reprod Domest Anim 1996, 31:17.
51. Vulcano G.J., Moses D.F., Valcárcel A., de las Heras M.A. A lineal equation for the classification of progressive and hyperactive spermatozoa. Math Biosci 1998, 149:77-93.