A three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulations in canine ejaculates: Changes after cryopreservation

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 408-415

  Nunez Martinez I ^a   Moran, J M ^a   Pena F J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b Avd de la Universidad s/n   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYTOLOGY; DOG; EJACULATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CRYOPRESERVATION; DOGS; EJACULATION; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 33748571573     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: 14390531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00685.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abaigar T, Holt WV, Harrison RAP, del Barrio G, 1999: Sperm subpopulations in boar (Sus Scrofa) and gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) semen as revealed by pattern analysis of computer assisted motility assessments. Biol Reprod 60, 32-41.
2. Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, 2003: New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. J Androl 24, 343-352.
3. Beatty RA, 1972: The genetics of size and shape of spermatozoa organelles. In: Beatty RA, Gluecksson Waelsch S (ed.), The Genetics of Spermatozoa. Bogtrykkerit Forum, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 97-115.
4. Burgoyne PS, 1975: Sperm phenotype and its relationship to somatic and germ line genotype: a study using mouse aggregation chimeras. Dev Biol 44, 63-76.
5. Chantler E, Abraham Peskir J, Roberts C, 2004: Consistent presence of two normally distributed sperm subpopulations within normozoospermic human semen: a kinematic study. Int J Androl 27, 350-359.
6. Davis RO, Drobnis EZ, Overstreet JW (1995) Application of multivariate cluster, discriminate function and stepwise regression analysis to variable selection and predictive modelling of sperm cryosurvival Fertil Steril 63, 1051-1057.
7. ESHRE Andrology special interest group, 1998: Guidelines on the application of CASA technology in the analysis of spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13, 142-145.
8. de Geyter Ch, de Geiter M, Koppers B, Nieschlag L, 1998: Diagnostic accuracy of computer assisted sperm motion analysis. Hum Reprod 13, 2512-2520.
9. Holt WV, Van Look KJW, 2004: Concepts in sperm heterogeneity, sperm selection and sperm competition as biological foundations for laboratory tests of semen quality. Reproduction 127, 527-535.
10. Larsen L, Scheike T, Kold Jensen L, Peter Bonde J, Ernst E, Henrik Hjollund N, Zhou Y, Erik Skakkebaek N, Giwercman A, Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team, 2000: Computer assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. Hum Reprod 15, 1562-1567.
11. Martinez-Pastor F, García-Macias V, Alvarez M, Herráez P, Anel L, de Paz P, 2005: Sperm subpopulation in Iberian red deer epidydimal sperm and their changes through the cryopreservation process. Biol Reprod 72, 316-327.
12. Mortimer ST, 2000: CASA - practical aspects. J Androl 21, 514-524.
13. Núñez Martinez I, Moran JM, Peña FJ., 2005: Do computer assisted derived morphometric sperm characteristics reflect DNA status in canine spermatozoa? Reprod Dom Anim 40, 537-543.
14. Peña AI, 2004: Canine fresh and cryopreserved semen evaluation. Anim Reprod Sci 82-83, 209-224.
15. Peña A, Forsberg L, 2001: Effect of spermatozoal concentration and post-thaw dilution rate on survival after thawing of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology 54, 703-718.
16. Peña FJ, Johanisson A, Wallgren M, Rodríguez Maatínez H, 2003: Antioxidant supplementation in vitro improves boar sperm motility, and mithocondrial membrane potential after cryopreservation of different fractions of the ejaculate. Anim Reprod Sci 78, 85-98.
17. Peña FJ, Saravia F, García Herreros M, Nuñez-Martinez I, Tapia JA, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodriguez Martinez H, 2005: Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and its relation to post thaw quality. J Androl 26, 716-723.
18. Quintero-Moreno A, Miró J, Rigau T, Rodríguez Gil JE, 2003: Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology 59, 1973-1990.
19. Rodriguez Martinez H, 2003: Laboratory assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reprod Dom Anim 38, 312-318.
20. Roldon ERS, Cassinello J, Abaigar T, Gomendio M 1998: Inbreeding, fluctuating asymmetry and ejaculate quality in an endangered ungulate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265, 243-248.
21. Rota A, Peña AI, Linde-Forsberg C, Rodriguez Martinez H. 1999: In vitro capacitation of chilled and frozen thawed dog spermatozoa assessed by the chlortetracycline assay and changes in motility patterns. Anim Reprod Sci 57, 199-215.
22. Takagi H, Kurihara A, Inone T, Nakamura I, Kimura M, 2001: Investigation of usefulness of sperm analysis in dogs for male fertility study. J Toxicol Sci 26, 313-321.
23. Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K, 2002: Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57, 149-179.
24. Watson PF, Plummer JM 1985: The response of boar sperm membrane to cold shock and cooling. In: Johnson LA, Larsson K (eds). Deep freezing of boar semen SLU, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 113-127.