CDK5 and MEKK1 mediate pro-apoptotic signalling following endoplasmic reticulum stress in an autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa model

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 409-415

  Kang, Min Ji ^a   Chung, Jaehoon ^a   Ryoo, Hyung Don ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 5; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE KINASE 1; STRESS ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE 5 GENE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM STRESS; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; GENE INACTIVATION; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE KINASE 1 GENE; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATOR GENE; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UNFOLDED PROTEIN RESPONSE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CELL LINE; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 5; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM STRESS; GENES, DOMINANT; HUMANS; JNK MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MAP KINASE KINASE KINASE 1; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; RHODOPSIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84859424251     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2447     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Dryja, T. et al. A point mutation of the rhodopsin gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa. Nature 343, 364-366 (1990).
2. Sung, C. H. et al. Rhdopsin mutations in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6481-6485 (1991).
3. Ryoo, H. D., Domingos, P. M., Kang, M. J. & Steller, H. Unfolded protein response in a Drosophila model for retinal degeneration. EMBO J. 26, 242-252 (2007). (Pubitemid 46094715)
4. Walter, P. & Ron, D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to hemeostatic regulation. Science 334, 1081-1086 (2011).
5. Kang, M-J. & Ryoo, H.D. Suppression of retinal degeneration in Drosophila by stimulation of ER-associated degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17043-17048 (2009).
6. Travers, K. J. et al. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell 101, 249-258 (2000).
7. Harding, H. P. et al. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol. Cell 11, 619-633 (2003). (Pubitemid 36385118)
8. Yamamoto, K. et al. Transcriptional induction of mammalian ER quality control proteins is mediated by single, or combined action of ATF6 and xbp1. Dev. Cell 13, 365-376 (2007). (Pubitemid 47308680)
9. Colley, N. J., Cassill, J. A., Baker, E. K. & Zuker, C. S. Defective intracellular transport is the molecular basis of rhodopsin-dependent dominant retinal degeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3070-3074 (1995).
10. Kurada, P. & O'Tousa, J. E. Retinal degeneration caused by dominant rhodopsin mutations in Drosophila. Neuron 14, 571-579 (1995).
11. Hewes, R. S., Schaefer, A. M. & Taghert, P. H. The cryptocephal gene (ATF4) en-codes multiple basic-leucine zipper proteins controlling molting and metamorphosis in Drosophila. Genetics 155, 1711-1723 (2000). (Pubitemid 30626391)
12. Harding, H. P. et al. Regulated translation initiation controls stress-induced gene expression in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 6, 1099-1108 (2000).
13. Marciniak, S. J. et al. CHOP induces death by promoting protein synthesis and oxidation in the stressed endoplasmic reticulum. Genes Dev. 18, 3066-3077 (2004). (Pubitemid 39658175)
14. Li, G., Scull, C., Ozcan, L. & Tabas, I. NADPH oxidase links endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress and PKR activation to induce apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 191, 1113-1125 (2010).
15. Song, B. et al. Chop deletion reduces oxidative stress, improves cell function, and promotes cell survival in multiple mouse models of diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 3378-3389 (2008).
16. Timmins, J. M. et al. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II links ER stress with Fas and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 2925-2941 (2009).
17. Tu, B. P. & Weissman, J. S. Oxidative protein folding in eukaryotes: mechanisms and consequences. J. Cell Biol. 164, 341-346 (2004). (Pubitemid 38174761)
18. Morrison, D. K., Murakami, M. S. & Cleghon, V. Protein kinases and phosphatases in the Drosophila genome. J. Cell Biol. 150, 57-62 (2000).
19. Connell-Crowley, L., Le Gall, M. & Giniger, E. The cyclin-dependent kinase CDK5 controls multiple aspects of axon patterning in vivo. Curr. Biol. 10, 599-602 (2000). (Pubitemid 30329446)
20. Tsai, L. H., Delalle, I., Caviness, V. S., Chae, T. & Harlow, E. p35 is a neural-specific regulatory subunit of cyclin-dependent kinase 5. Nature 371, 419-423 (1994). (Pubitemid 24302556)
21. Choi, J. H. et al. Anti-diabetic drugs inhibit obesity-linked phosphorylation of PPAR by CDK5. Nature 466, 451-456 (2010).
22. Wei, F. Y. et al. CDK5-dependent regulation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Nat. Med. 11, 1104-1108 (2005).
23. Saito, T. et al. p25/cyclin-dependent kinase 5 promotes the progression of cell death in nucleus of endoplasmic reticulum-stressed neurons. J. Neurochem. 102, 133-140 (2007). (Pubitemid 46906270)
24. Patrick, G. N. et al. Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates CDK5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration. Nature 402, 615-622 (1999). (Pubitemid 129516324)
25. Qu, D. et al. Role of CDK5-mediated phosphorylation of Prx2 in MPTP toxicity and Parkinson's disease. Neuron 55, 37-52 (2007). (Pubitemid 46990825)
26. Elbein, A. D. Inhibitors of glycoprotein synthesis. Methods Enzymol. 98, 135-154 (1983). (Pubitemid 14219882)
27. Connell-Crowley, L., Vo, D., Luke, L. & Giniger, E. Drosophila lacking the CDK5 activator, p35, display defective axon guidance, age-dependent behavioral desrcits and reduced lifespan. Mech. Dev. 124, 341-349 (2007). (Pubitemid 46509727)
28. Rorth, P. A modular misexpression screen in Drosophila detecting tissue-specific phenotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12418-12422 (1996). (Pubitemid 26367158)
29. Hay, B. A., Wasserman, D. A. & Rubin, G. M. Drosophila homologs of bac-ulovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell 83, 1253-1262 (1995). (Pubitemid 26007815)
30. Inoue, H. et al. A Drosophila MAPKKK, D-MEKK1, mediates stress response through activation of p38 MAPK. EMBO J. 20, 5421-5430 (2001). (Pubitemid 32959462)
31. Seong, K. H., Li, D., Shimizu, H., Nakamura, R. & Ishii, S. Inheritance of stress-induced, ATF-2-dependent epigenetic change. Cell 145, 1049-1061 (2011).
32. Lytton, J., Westlin, M. & Hanley, M. R. Thapsigargin inhibits the sarcoplasmic or endoplasmic reticulum Ca-ATPase family of calcium pumps. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17067-17071 (1991). (Pubitemid 21907906)
33. Chew, S. K. et al. The apical caspase dronc governs programmed and unprogrammed cell death in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 7, 897-907 (2004). (Pubitemid 39654733)
34. Xu, D., Li, Y., Arcaro, M., Lackey, M. & Bergmann, A. The CARD-carrying caspase Dronc is essential for most, but not all, developmental cell death in Drosophila. Development 132, 2125-2134 (2005). (Pubitemid 40744472)
35. Pichaud, F. & Desplan, C. A new visualization approach for identifying mutations that affect differentiation and organization of the Drosophila ommatidia. Development 128, 815-826 (2001). (Pubitemid 32288193)
36. Lee, M. S. et al. Neurotoxicity induces cleavage of p35 to p25 by calpain. Nature 405, 360-364 (2000).
37. Dhavan, R., Greer, P. L., Morabit, M. A., Orlando, L. R. & Tsai, L. H. et al. J. Neurosci. 22, 7879-7891 (2002).
38. Nakagawa, T. & Yuan, J. Cross-talk between two cysteine protease families. Activation of caspase-12 by calpain in apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 150, 887-894 (2000). (Pubitemid 30663424)
39. Zhang, Y. et al. Epigenetic blocking of an enhancer region controls irradiation-induced proapoptotic gene expression in Drosophila embryos. Dev. Cell 14, 481-493 (2008). (Pubitemid 351479936)
40. Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401-415 (1993). (Pubitemid 23214028)
41. Xu, T. & Rubin, G. M. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development 117, 1223-1237 (1993). (Pubitemid 23154489)
42. Riesgo-Escovar, J. R., Jenni, M., Fritz, A. & Hafen, E. The Drosophila Jun-N-terminal kinase is required for cell morphogenesis but not for DJun-dependent cell fate specification in the eye. Genes Dev. 10, 2759-2768 (1996). (Pubitemid 26384495)
43. Glise, B. & Noselli, S. Coupling of Jun amino-terminal kinase and Decapen-taplegic signaling pathways in Drosophila morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 11, 1738-1747 (1997). (Pubitemid 27300598)
44. Armknecht, S. et al. High-throughput RNA interference screens in Drosophila tissue culture cells. Methods Enzymol. 392, 55-73 (2005). (Pubitemid 40092508)
45. Tomlinson, A. The cellular dynamics of pattern formation in the eye of Drosophila. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 89 (1985).