Bernstein's levels of construction of movements applied to upper limb prosthetics

Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 67-76

  Bongers, Raoul M ^a   Kyberd, Peter J ^b   Bouwsema, Hanneke ^a   Kenney, Laurence P J ^c   Plettenburg, Dick H ^d   Van Der Sluis, Corry K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

motor control; motor learning; pattern recognition; prosthetic hand; prosthetic training; TMR; upper limb prosthetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859404862     PISSN: 10408800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3182532419     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Atkins DJ, Heard DC, Donovan WH. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot 1996;8:2-11.
2. Biddis E, Chau T. Upper-limb prostheticsVcritical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:977-987. (Pubitemid 350307459)
3. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, et al. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26: 60-63. (Pubitemid 38159836)
4. Kyberd PJ, Davey JJ, Morrison JD. A survey of upper-limb prosthesis users in Oxfordshire. J Prosthet Orthot 1998;10:85-86.
5. McFarland LV, Winkler SLH, Heineman AW, et al. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010;47:299-316.
6. Plettenburg DH. Upper Extremity Prosthetics: Current Status and Evaluation. Delft, the Netherlands: VSSD; 2006.
7. Bernstein NA. On dexterity and its development. In Latash ML, Turvey MT, eds. Dexterity and Its Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996:3-244.
8. Guiard Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav 1987;19:486-517.
9. Steele J, Uomini N. Can the archeology of manual specialization tell us anything about language evolution? A survey of the state of play. Camb Archeological J 2009;19:97-110.
10. Muzumdar A, ed. Powered Upper Limb Prostheses. New York, NY: Springer; 2004.
11. Ohnishi K, Weir RF, Kuiken TA. Neural machine interfaces for controlling multifunctional powered upper-limb prostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007;4:43-53. (Pubitemid 46157681)
12. Smit G, Plettenburg DH. Design of a hydraulic hand prosthesis, with articulating fingers. In: MEC'11, ed. Proceedings of the University of New Brunswick's International Conference on Advanced Limb Prosthetics. Fredericton, NB, Canada; 2011:24-26.
13. Carlson LE, Long MP. Quantitative Evaluation of Body-Powered Prostheses. Chicago, IL: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Dynamic Systems and Control Division; 1988: 1-16.
14. Corin JD, Holley TM, Hasler RA, Ashman RB. Mechanical comparison of terminal devices. Clin Prosthet Orthot 1987;11:235-244.
15. LeBlanc M, Setoguchi Y, Shaperman J, Carlson L. Mechanical work efficiencies of body-powered prehensors for young children. Child Prosthet Orthot Clin 1992;27:70-75.
16. Smit G, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary hand and hook prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2010;34:411-427.
17. Smit G, Bongers RM, Van der Sluis CK, Plettenburg DH. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prostheses, 24 years of development? J Rehabil Res Dev Accepted for publication.
18. Peerdeman B, Broere D, Witteveen H, et al. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:719-738.
19. Zecca M, Micera S, Carrozza MC, Dario P. Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2002;30:459-485. (Pubitemid 36528604)
20. Almström C, Herberts P, Körner L. Experience with Swedish multifunctional prosthetic hands controlled by pattern recognition of multiple myoelectric signals. Int Orthopaed 1981;5:15-21. (Pubitemid 11125880)
21. Codd RD, Nightingale JM, Todd RW. An adaptive multi-functional hand prosthesis. J Physiol (Lond) 1973;232:55-56.
22. Kyberd PJ, Light C, Nightingale JM, et al. The design of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands, a study of the Southampton Hand. Robotica 2001;19:593-600. (Pubitemid 34011243)
23. Nightingale JM. Microprocessor control of an artificial arm. J Microcomputer Appl 1985;8:167-173.
24. Collier M, LeBlanc M. Axilla bypass ring for shoulder harnesses for upper-limb prostheses. J Prosthet Orthot 1996;8:130-131.
25. LeBlanc MA. Innovation and improvement of body-powered arm prostheses: a first step. Clin Prosthet Orthot 1985;9:13-16.
26. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:60.
27. Van der Niet O, Reinders-Messelink HA, Bongers RM, et al. The i-LIMB hand and the DMC plus hand compared: a case report. Prosthet Orthot Int 2010;34:216-220.
28. Latash LP, Latash ML. A new book by Bernstein, N.A.Von dexterity and its development. J Mot Behav 1994;26:56-61.
29. Whiting HTA, ed. Human Motor Actions: Bernstein Reassessed (Advances in Psychology). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1984.
30. Beek PJ. Toward a theory of implicit learning in the perceptualmotor domain. Int J Sport Psychol 2000;31:547-554.
31. Bernstein NA. The problem of the interrelation of co-ordination and localization. In: Whiting HTA, ed. Human Movement Actions: Bernstein Reassessed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1935;77-119.
32. Feldman AG. Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda-model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 1986;18: 17-54. (Pubitemid 16119226)
33. Lee WA. Neuromotor synergies as a basis for coordinated intentional action. J Mot Behav 1984;16:135-170. (Pubitemid 14060089)
34. Macpherson JM. How flexible are muscle synergies? In: Humphrey DR, Freund H-J, eds. Motor Control: Concepts and Issues. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1991;33-41.
35. Bizzi E, Cheung VCK, d'Avella A, et al. Combining modules for movement. Brain Res Rev 2008;57:125-133. (Pubitemid 350218169)
36. Tresch MC, Saltiel P, Bizzi E. The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:162-167. (Pubitemid 30491317)
37. Tresch MC, Cheung VCK, d'Avella A. Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulates and experimental data sets. J Neurophysiol 2006;95: 2199-2212.
38. Tresch MC, Jarc A. The case for and against muscle synergies. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009;19:601-607.
39. Schieber MH. Constraints on somatotopic organization in the primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:2125-2143. (Pubitemid 34000578)
40. Graziano MSA. The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2006;29:105-134.
41. Lemon RN, Kirkwood PA, Maier MA, et al. Direct and indirect pathways for corticospinal control of upper limb motoneurons in the primate. Prog Brain Res 2004;143:263-279. (Pubitemid 37443001)
42. Bertels T, Schmalz T, Ludwigs E. Biomechanical evaluation of a free-swinging shoulder prosthesis for shoulder amputees while walking and standing. Paper presented at the: ISPO-13 World Congress; 2010; Leipzig, Germany. Abstracts (257-258).
43. Brånemark PI. The Osseointegration Book: From Calvarium to Calcaneus. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing; 2006.
44. Jönsson S, Caine-Winterberger K, Brånemark R. Osseointegration amputation prostheses on the upper limbs: methods, prosthetics and rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011;35: 190-200.
45. Fougner A, Scheme E, Chan A, et al. Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition [published online ahead of print August 15, 2011]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011.
46. Bouisset S, Zattara M. A sequence of postural movements precedes voluntary movement. Neurosci Lett 1981;22:263-270. (Pubitemid 11110767)
47. CordoOJ, Nashner LM. Properties of postural adjustments associated with rapid arm movement. J Neurophysiol 1982;47:287-302. (Pubitemid 12180722)
48. Lee WA, Buchanan TS, Rogers MW. Effects of arm acceleration and behavioral conditions on the organization of postural adjustments during arm flexion. Exp Brain Res 1987;66:257-270. (Pubitemid 17071121)
49. Massion J. Movement, posture and equilibrium: interaction and coordination. Prog Neurobiol 1991;38:35-57.
50. Cheung VCK, Piron L, Agostini M, et al. Stability of muscle synergies for voluntary actions after cortical stroke in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:19563-19568.
51. D'Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E. Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:300-308. (Pubitemid 36278289)
52. D'Avella A, Portone A, Fernandez L, Lacquaniti F. Control of fast reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations. J Neurosci 2006;26:7791-7810. (Pubitemid 44315149)
53. Ting LH, Chvatal SA. Decomposing muscle activity in motor tasks: methods and interpretation. In: Danion F, Latash ML, eds. Motor Control: Theories, Experiments and Applications. New York, NY; Oxford University Press; 2010:102-138.
54. Radhakrishnan SM, Baker SN, Jackson A. Learning a novel myoelectric-controlled interface task. J Neurophysiol 2008;100: 2397-2408.
55. Ajiboye A, Weir RF. Muscle synergies as a predictive framework for the EMG patterns of new hand postures. J Neural Eng 2009;6:036004. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/036004.
56. Asaka T, Wang Y, Fukushima J, Latash ML. Learning effects on muscle modes and multi-mode postural synergies. Exp Brain Res 2007;184:323-338.
57. Kargo WJ, Nitz DA. Early skill learning is expressed through selection and tuning of cortically represented muscle synergies. J Neurosci 2003;23:11255-11269. (Pubitemid 37548962)
58. Pulliam CL, Lambrecht JM, Kirsch RF. Electromyogram-based neural network control of transhumeral prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:739-753.
59. Scheme E, Englehart K. Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use.J RehabilResDev 2011;48:643-659.
60. Simon AM, Hargrove LJ, Lock BA, Kuiken TA. Target achievement control test: evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:619-627.
61. Van Lunteren A, Van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983;7:141-151. (Pubitemid 14224747)
62. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. Clin Biomech 2010;25:523-529.
63. Bouwsema H, Kyberd PJ, Hill W, et al. Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. J Rehabil Res Dev Accepted for publication.
64. Wing AM, Fraser C. The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol 1983;35A:297-309.
65. Hayhoe M, Ballard D. Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:188-194. (Pubitemid 40543254)
66. Land M, Mennie N, Rusted J. The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 1999;28:1311-1328.
67. Land M. Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:296-324. (Pubitemid 43782814)
68. Pelz J, Hayhoe M, Loeber R. The coordination of eye, head, and hand movements in a natural task. Exp Brain Res 2001;139:266-277. (Pubitemid 32681906)
69. Sobuh M. Visuomotor behaviours characterising myoelectric hand prosthesis use [dissertation]. Salford, United Kingdom: University of Salford. In preparation.
70. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. The role of order ofpractice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1759-1764.
71. Plettenburg DH, Hichert M, Smit G. Feedback in voluntary closing arm prostheses. In: MEC'11, ed. Proceedings of the University of New Brunswick's International Conference on Advanced Limb. Fredericton, NB, Canada; 2011:74-78.
72. Chappell PH. Making sense of artificial hands. J Med Eng Technol 2011;35:1-18.
73. Kyberd PJ. The intelligent hand. IEEE Rev 2000;46:31-35.
74. Gillespie RB, Contreras-Vidal JL, Shewoski PA, et al. Toward improved sensorimotor integration and learning using upper-limb prosthetic devices. In: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; August 31YSeptember 4, 2010; Buenos Aires, Argentina. Abstracts (pp. 5077-5080).
75. Winneger M, Kim N-H, Craelis W. Pressure signature of forearm as predictor of grip force. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45: 883-892.
76. Marasco PD, Keehoorn K, Colgate JE, et al. Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. Brain 2011;134:747-758.
77. Di Pino G, Guglielmelli E, Rossini PM. Neuroplasticity in amputees: main implications on bidirectional interfacing of cybernetic hand prostheses. Prog Neurobiol 2009;88:114-126.
78. Dhillon GS, Horch KW. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13:468-472. (Pubitemid 43019184)
79. Gasson M, Hutt B, Goodhew L, et al. Invasive neural prosthesis for neural signal detection and nerve stimulation. Int J Adaptive Control Signal Process 2005;19:365-375. (Pubitemid 40751241)
80. Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J, Barnes HJ, et al. Constraints on action selection: overhand versus underhand grips. In: Jeannerod M, ed. Attention and Performance XIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992:321-342.
81. Rosenbaum DA, Van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE. From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychol 1996;94:59-85. (Pubitemid 126407329)
82. Dumanian GA, Ko JH, O'Shaughnessy KD, et al. Targeted reinnervation for transhumeral amputees: current surgical technique and update on results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124: 863-869.
83. Kuiken TA, Dumanian GA, Lipschutz RD, et al. The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;28:245-253. (Pubitemid 40103696)
84. Kuiken TA, Li G, Lock BA, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA 2009;301:619-628.