Modeling of Suspended Sediment Concentration at Kasol in India Using ANN, Fuzzy Logic, and Decision Tree Algorithms

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 394-404

  Senthil Kumar, A R ^a   Ojha, C S P ^b   Goyal, Manish Kumar ^b,c,d   Singh, R D ^a   Swamee, P K ^e  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYDROLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

^c NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^e DR B R AMBEDKAR NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Bhakra reservoir; Fuzzy Logic; M5; Neural networks; REPTree; Suspended sediment concentration

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTIONS; CROSS-CORRELATION FUNCTION; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION-TREE ALGORITHM; FIELD ENGINEERS; HIGH VARIABILITY; INPUT VECTOR; M5; M5 MODEL TREE; PIECE-WISE LINEAR FUNCTIONS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; REPTREE; SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION; SEDIMENT LOADING; SOFTCOMPUTING TECHNIQUES; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATIONS;

ALGORITHMS; ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; DECISION TREES; FUZZY LOGIC; NEURAL NETWORKS; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SEDIMENTATION; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SOFT COMPUTING; SUSPENDED SEDIMENTS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BOUNDARY CONDITION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SEDIMENT YIELD; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT;

BHAKRA DAM; HIMACHAL PRADESH; INDIA; KASOL; SUTLA RIVER;

EID: 84859363621     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000445     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ajmera T.K. Goyal M.K. Development of stage discharge rating curve using model tree and neural networks: An application to Peachtree Creek in Atlanta. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(5):5702-5710. ESAPEH, 0957-4174, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.101.
2. Artificial neural networks in hydrology-I: Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2000, 5(2):115-123. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(115), (a).
3. Artificial neural networks in hydrology-II: Hydrologic applications. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2000, 5(2):124-137. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:2(124), (b).
4. Azamathulla H. Ghani A. Chang C.K. Hasan Z.A. Zakaria N.A. Machine learning approach to predict sediment load-A case study. Clean-Soil, Air, Water 2010, 38(10):969-976. 1863-0650, 10.1002/clen.201000068, .
5. Chen S. Cowan C.F. N. Grant P.M. Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Network 1991, 2(2):302-309. ITNNEP, 1045-9227, 10.1109/72.80341.
6. Chiu S. Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. J. Intell. Fuzzy Sys. 1994, 2(3):267-278. JIFSE2, 1064-1246.
7. Cigizoglu H.K. Suspended sediment estimation for rivers using artificial neural networks and sediment rating curves. Turk., J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2002, 26(1):27-36. EESCF5, 1092-8758.
8. Cigizoglu H.K. Kisi O. Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 2006, 317(3-4):221-228. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.019.
9. Cobaner M. Unal B. Kisi O. Suspended sediment concentration estimation by an adaptive neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches using hydro-meteorological data. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 2009, 367(1-2):52-61. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.024.
10. Daud M.N. R. Corne D.W. Human readable rule induction in medical data mining: survey of existing algorithms. Proc., WSEAS European Computing Conf. 2007, 1:787-798. 10.1007/978-0-387-84814-3_79 Springer LNEE
11. Fernando D.A. K. Shamseldin A.Y. Investigation of internal functioning of the radial-basis-function neural network river flow forecasting models. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2009, 14(3):286-292. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:3(286).
12. Gao P. Pasternack G. Dynamics of suspended sediment transport at field-scale drain channels of irrigation-dominated watersheds in the Sonoran Desert, southeastern California. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21(16):2081-2092. HYPRE3, 0885-6087, 10.1002/hyp.6398.
13. Govindaraju R.S. Rao A.R. Artificial neural networks in hydrology 2000, and Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
14. Goyal M.K. Ojha C.S. P. Analysis of mean monthly rainfall runoff data of Indian catchments using dimensionless variables by neural network. J. Environ. Protect. 2010, 1(2):155-171. 2152-2197, 10.4236/jep.2010.12020.
15. Goyal M.K. Ojha C.S. P. Downscaling of surface temperature for lake catchment in arid region in India using linear multiple regression and neural networks. Int. J. Climatol. 2012, IJCLEU, 0899-8418, 10.1002/joc.2286, in press.
16. Goyal M.K. Ojha C.S. P. Burn Donald H. An evaluation of decision tree algorithm as downscaling tool: Application on Lake Basin for an arid region in India. 10th Conf. Canadian Geophysical Union 2010 University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
17. Goyal M.K. Ojha C.S. P. Downscaling of precipitation on Lake Basin: Evaluation of rule and decision tree induction algorithms. Hydrol. Res. 2012b, 43. and in press.
18. Goyal M.K. Ojha C.S. P. Estimation of scour downstream of ski-jump bucket using support vector and m5 model tree. Water Resour. Manage. 2011, 25(9):2177-2195. 10.1007/s11269-011-9801-6.
19. Hagan M.T. Menhaj M.B. Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 1994, 5(6):989-993. ITNNEP, 1045-9227, 10.1109/72.329697.
20. Haghizadeh A. Shui L.T. Goudarzi E. Estimation of yield sediment using artificial neural network at basin scale. Australian J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010, 4(7):1668-1675. 2076-0841.
21. Hsu K.-L. Gupta H.V. Sorooshian S. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31(10):2517-2530. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/95WR01955.
22. Jain A. Srinivasulu S. Development of effective and efficient rainfall-runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded genetic algorithms and artificial neural network techniques. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40(4):W04302, 1-12. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/2003WR002355.
23. Jain S.K. Development of integrated discharge and sediment rating relation using Compound Neural Network. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2001, 127(1):30-37. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2001)127:1(30).
24. Jain S.K. Development of integrated sediment rating curves using ANNs. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13(3):124-131. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:3(124).
25. Jain S.K. Singh V.P. Genuchten M.T. V. Analysis of soil water retention data using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2004, 9(5):415-420. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:5(415).
26. Kisi O. Multi-Layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2004, 49(6):1025-1040. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1623/hysj.49.6.1025.55720.
27. Kisi O. Suspended sediment estimation using neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2005, 50(4):683-696. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1623/hysj.2005.50.4.683.
28. Kisi O. River suspended sediment concentration modelling using neural differential evolution approach. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 2010, 389(1-2):227-235. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.003.
29. Kisi O. Karahan M.E. Sen Z. River suspended sediment modelling using fuzzy logic approach. Hydrol. Process. 2006, 20(20):4351-4362. HYPRE3, 0885-6087, 10.1002/hyp.6166.
30. Klir J. Foger T.A. Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information 1988, and Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
31. Kothyari U.C. Jain M.K. Ranga Raju K.G. Estimation of temporal variation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. Hydrol. Sci. J., IAHS 2002, 47(5):693-706. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1080/02626660209492974.
32. Lohani A.K. Goel N.K. Bhatia K.K. S. Deriving stage-discharge-sediment concentration relationships using Fuzzy logic. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2007, 52(4):793-807. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1623/hysj.52.4.793.
33. Maier H.R. Dandy G.C. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: review of modelling issues and applications. Environ. Model. Software 2000, 15(1):101-124. EMSOFT, 1364-8152, 10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00007-9.
34. Metternicht G. Assessing temporal and spatial changes of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS Foundations of an expert system. Ecol. Model. 2001, 144(2-3):163-179. ECMODT, 0304-3800, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00371-4.
35. Mianaei S.J. Keshavarzi A.R. Prediction of riverine suspended sediment discharge using fuzzy logic algorithms, and some implications for estuarine setting. Geo.-Mar. Lett. 2009, 30(1):35-45. GMLEDI, 0276-0460, 10.1007/s00367-009-0149-3.
36. Minns A.W. Hall M.J. Artificial neural networks as rainfall runoff models. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1996, 41(3):399-418. HSJODN, 0262-6667, 10.1080/02626669609491511.
37. Nagy H.M. Watanabe K. Hirano M. Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2002, 128(6):588-595. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:6(588).
38. Nash J.E. Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: 1. discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 1970, 10(3):282-290. JHYDA7, 0022-1694, 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
39. Ojha C.S. P. Goyal M.K. Kumar S. Applying Fuzzy logic and the point count system to select landfill sites. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 135(1-3):99-106. EMASDH, 0167-6369, 10.1007/s10661-007-9713-3.
40. Parajuli P.B. Nelson N.O. Frees L.D. Mankin K.R. Comparison of AnnAGNPS and SWAT model simulation results in USDA-CEAP agricultural watersheds in south-central Kansas. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23(5):748-763. HYPRE3, 0885-6087, 10.1002/hyp.7174.
41. Quinlan J.R. Learning with continuous classes. Proc. 5th Australian Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence 1992, 343-348 World Scientific, Singapore.
42. Raghuwanshi N.S. Singh R. Reddy L.S. Runoff and sediment yield modelling using artificial neural networks: Upper Siwane River, India. J. Hydrol. Eng., 2006, 11(1):71-79. JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:1(71).
43. Rumelhart D.E. Hinton E. Williams J. Learning internal representation by error propagation, parallel distributed processing 1986, 1:318-362. and Vol. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
44. Salas J.D. Delleur J.W. Yevjevich V. Lane W.L. Applied modelling of hydrologic time series 1980, and Water Resources Publications, P. O. Box 2841, Littleton, CO 80161.
45. Senthil Kumar A.R. Sudheer K.P. Jain S.K. Agarwal P.K. Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks: Comparison of network types. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19(6):1277-1291. HYPRE3, 0885-6087, 10.1002/hyp.5581.
46. Shahin M.M. A. An overview of reservoir sedimentation in some African river basins. Sediment problems: Strategies for monitoring, prediction and control." Proc., Yokohama Symp. 1993, 217:93-100. ". No. IAHS, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
47. Singh K.K. Pal M. Ojha C.S. P. Singh V.P. Estimation of removal efficiency for settling basins using neural networks and support vector machines. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13(3):146-155. JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:3(146).
48. Smith H.G. Estimation of suspended sediment loads and delivery in an incised upland headwater catchment, south-eastern Australia. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22(16):3135-3148. HYPRE3, 0885-6087, 10.1002/hyp.6898.
49. Srinivasulu S. Jain A. River flow prediction using an integrated approach. J. Hydrol. Eng., 2009, 14(1):75-83. JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:1(75).
50. Sudheer K.P. Gosain A.K. Ramasastri K.S. data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol. Process. 2002, 16(6):1325-1330. HYPRE3, 0885-6087, 10.1002/hyp.554.
51. Tayfur G. Modelling two-dimensional erosion process over infiltrating surfaces. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2001, 6(3):259-262. JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:3(259).
52. Tayfur G. Applicability of sediment transport capacity models for nonsteady state erosion from steep slopes. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2002, 7(3):252-259. JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:3(252).
53. Tayfur G. Ozdemir S. Singh V.P. Fuzzy logic algorithm for runoff-induced sediment transport from bare soil surfaces. Adv. Water Resour. 2003, 26(12):1249-1256. AWREDI, 0309-1708, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.005.
54. Tejwani K.G. Reservoir sedimentation in india-Its causes, control, and future course of action. Water Int. 1984, 9(4):150-154. WAINEL, 0250-8060, 10.1080/02508068408686525.
55. ANN Toolbox User's Guide 2001, The MathWorks, Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098.
56. Thirumalaiah K. Deo M.C. River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 1998, 3(1):26-32. JHYEEF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:1(26).
57. Vos N.J. Rientjes T.H. M. Multiobjective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W08434, 1-15. WRERAQ, 0043-1397.
58. Witten I.H. Frank E. Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques 2005, and 2nd Ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
59. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control 1965, 8(3):338-353. IETTAW, 0019-9958, 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
60. Zadeh L.A. The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1983, 11(1-3):197-198. FSSYD8, 0165-0114, 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80081-5.