Erratum: Evaluating interventions against Salmonella in broiler chickens: Applying synthesis research in support of quantitative exposure assessment (Epidemiology and Infection (2011) DOI: 10.1017/S0950268811001373);Evaluating interventions against Salmonella in broiler chickens: Applying synthesis research in support of quantitative exposure assessment

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 140, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 925-945

  Bucher, O ^a,b   Fazil, A ^b   Rajic A ^a,b   Farrar, A ^a,b   Wills, R ^c   McEwen, S A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Broiler; exposure assessment; meta analysis; Salmonella; systematic review

Indexed keywords

FOSCARNET SODIUM; SODIUM HYDROXIDE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; BACTERIAL TRANSMISSION; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BROILER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISINFECTION; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD SAFETY; INFECTION CONTROL; INFECTION RISK; INTERVENTION STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; POULTRY FARMING; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84859336064     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: 14694409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268811001841     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety Inspection Service. Pathogen reduction; hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems; final rule. Federal Register 1996; 61: 38806-38989.
2. Van Immerseel F, et al. Strategies to control Salmonella in the broiler production chain. World's Poultry Science Journal 2009; 65: 367-392.
3. Forshell LP, Wierup M. Salmonella contamination: A significant challenge to the global marketing of animal food products. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2006; 25: 541-554. (Pubitemid 44701880)
4. Wegener HC, et al. Salmonella control programs in Denmark. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2003; 9: 774-780. (Pubitemid 36801575)
5. Collins JD, Wall PG. Food safety and animal production systems: Controlling zoonoses at farm level. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 2004; 23: 685-700. (Pubitemid 40180993)
6. European Union. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 646/2007 of 12 June 2007. Official Journal of the European Union 2007; L151: 21-31.
7. Rajić A, et al. An overview of microbial food safety programs in beef, pork, and poultry from farm to processing in Canada. Journal of Food Protection 2007; 70: 1286-1294. (Pubitemid 46786778)
8. Chicken Farmers of Canada. Safe, safer, safest : Chicken Farmers of Canada's on-farm food safety assurance program, 2005 Ottawa, ON: Chicken Farmers of Canada.
9. Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) of the United Nations. Salmonella and Campylobacter in chicken meat: Meeting Report. In: Microbiological Risk Assessment Series ; 19. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2009.
10. Toyofuku H. Harmonization of international risk assessment protocol. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2006; 53: 579-590. (Pubitemid 44737860)
11. Goldbohm RA, et al. Risk estimation for carcinogens based on epidemiological data: A structured approach, illustrated by an example on chromium. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2006; 44: 294-310.
12. Guzelian PS, et al. Evidence-based toxicology: A comprehensive framework for causation. Human and Experimental Toxicology 2005; 24: 161-201. (Pubitemid 40778683)
13. Peters JL, et al. The contribution of systematic review and meta-analysis methods to human health risk assessment: Neurobehavioral effects of Manganese. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2008; 14: 1250-1272.
14. Anderson S, et al. Asking the right questions : Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems 2008; 6: 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4505- 6-7.
15. Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 2010; 35: 399-404.
16. Sargeant JM, et al. The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2006; 75: 141-151.
17. World Health Organization Food and Agriculture Organization. Microbiological risk assessment series No.12: Risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in broiler chickens, 2009. WHO.
18. Farrar A. The application of research synthesis methods for evaluating primary research on Salmonella in broiler chickens (M.Sc. dissertation). Canada: University of Guelph (Canada), 2009, 231 pp.
19. McEwen S, et al. The effectiveness of interventions for reducing Salmonella in broiler chickens from farmto- processing Final report prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs. 2010; FS070737, pp. 1-183.
20. Viola C, DeVincent SJ. Overview of issues pertaining to the manufacture, distribution, and use of antimicrobials in animals and other information relevant to animal antimicrobial use data collection in the United States. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2006; 73: 111-131. (Pubitemid 43287802)
21. Silbergeld EK, et al. One reservoir : redefining the community origins of antimicrobial-resistant infections. Medical Clinics of North America 2008; 92: 1391-1407.
22. Silbergeld EK, Graham J, Price LB. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annual Review of Public Health 2008; 29: 151-169. (Pubitemid 351600403)
23. Fraser RW, et al. Reducing Campylobacter and Salmonella infection : two studies of the economic cost and attitude to adoption of on-farm biosecurity measures. Zoonoses and Public Health 2010; 57: e109-e115.
24. Arsenault J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. carcass contamination in broiler chickens slaughtered in Québec, Canada. Journal of Food Protection 2007; 70: 1820-1828. (Pubitemid 47237401)
25. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions,Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009). Accessed 24 September 2009.
26. Borenstein M, et al. Introduction to Meta-analysis. Chichester, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Kotula KL, Pandya Y. Bacterial contamination of broiler chickens before scalding. Journal of Food Protection 1995; 58: 1326-1329. (Pubitemid 3026909)
28. Arsenault RK. Campylobacter and Salmonella positive commercial broiler chicken farms in Ontario and associated risk factors (M.Sc. dissertation). Canada: University of Guelph (Canada), 2006, 292 pp.
29. Bailey JS, et al. Sources and movement of Salmonella through integrated poultry operations: A multistate epidemiological investigation. Journal of Food Protection 2001; 64: 1690-1697. (Pubitemid 34010083)
30. Bailey JS, et al. Serotype tracking of Salmonella through integrated broiler chicken operations. Journal of Food Protection 2002; 65: 742-745. (Pubitemid 34494821)
31. Payne JB, et al. Characterization of Salmonella from three commercial North Carolina broiler farms. International Journal of Poultry Science 2006; 5: 1102-1109. (Pubitemid 46422913)
32. Siemon CE, Bahnson PB, Gebreyes WA. Comparative investigation of prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella between pasture and conventionally reared poultry. Avian Diseases 2007; 51: 112-117. (Pubitemid 46481475)
33. Vose D Model Assist for Crystal Ball v 1.0. 2004 Vose D Model Assist for Crystal Ball v. 1.0. 2004
34. Rigby CE, et al. Sources of Salmonellae in an uninfected commercially-processed broiler flock. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 1980; 44: 267-274.
35. Rigby CE, et al. Flock infection and transport as sources of salmonellae in broiler chickens and carcasses. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 1980; 44: 328-337.
36. McKee SR, Townsend JC, Bilgili SF. Use of a scald additive to reduce levels of Salmonella Typhimurium during poultry processing. Poultry Science 2008; 87: 1672-1677.
37. Powell C, et al. Microbiological comparison of inspection- passed and reprocessed broiler carcasses. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 1995; 4: 23-31.
38. Beers K, et al. A. Microbial efficacy of commercial application of CecureReg. CPC antimicrobial to ingestacontaminated pre-chill broiler carcasses. International Journal of Poultry Science 2006; 5: 698-703. (Pubitemid 44607282)
39. Cason JA, et al. Partitioning of external and internal bacteria carried by broiler chickens before processing. Journal of Food Protection 2007; 70: 2056-2062. (Pubitemid 47479842)
40. Northcutt JK, et al. Microbiological impact of spray washing broiler carcasses using different chlorine concentrations and water temperatures. Poultry Science 2005; 84: 1648-1652. (Pubitemid 44509849)
41. Huezo R, et al. Effect of dry air or immersion chilling on recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses. Journal of Food Protection 2007; 70: 1829-1834. (Pubitemid 47237402)
42. Yang H, et al. A probability model for crosscontamination by Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella Typhimurium in poultry chilling process. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 2002; 18: 717-724.
43. Smith DP, Cason JA, Berrang ME. Effect of fecal contamination and cross-contamination on numbers of coliform, Escherichia coli. Campylobacter, and Salmonella on immersion-chilled broiler carcasses. Journal of Food Protection 2005; 68: 1340-1345. (Pubitemid 40950581)
44. Cassin MH, et al. Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1998; 41: 21-44. (Pubitemid 28254291)
45. Fazil AM. A primer on risk assessment modelling: focus on seafood products. Food and Agriculture Organization Fisheries Technical 2005, Paper 56.
46. European Food Safety Authority. Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. European Food Safety Authority Journal 2010; 8: 1637.
47. Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies ? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009; 46: 1386-1400.
48. Arskey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies : towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005; 8: 19-32.
49. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies : advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 2010; 5: 1-9.
50. Catts SV, et al. Appraising evidence for intervention effectiveness in early psychosis: Conceptual framework and review of evaluation approaches. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2010; 44: 195-219.
51. Oosterom J, et al. Origin and prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry processing. Journal of Food Protection 1983; 46: 339-344.
52. Izat AL, et al. Incidence and level of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler processing. Poultry Science 1988; 67: 1568-1572.
53. Berrang ME, Dickens JA. Presence and level of Campylobacter spp. on broiler carcasses throughout the processing plant. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2000; 9: 43-47.