Concurrent validity and reliability of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory-computer adaptive test mobility domain

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 171-176

  Dumas, Helene M ^a   Fragala Pinkham, Maria A ^a  

^a FRANCISCAN HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HUMAN; INFANT; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; NEWBORN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED CHILDREN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MOBILITY LIMITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859328580     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31824c94ca     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Haley S, Coster W. PEDI-CAT: Development, Standardization and Administration Manual. Boston, MA: CRECare LLC; 2010.
2. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PA. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory: Development, Standardization and Administration Manual. Boston, MA: Trustees of Boston University; 1992.
3. Haley SM, CosterWJ, Kao YC, et al. Lessons from use of the Pediatric Evaluation ofDisability Inventory (PEDI): where do we go from here? Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22:69-75.
4. Dumas HM, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Haley SM, et al. Item bank development for a revised Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010;30:168-184.
5. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Dumas HM, et al. Accuracy and precision of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) for children 0 to 21 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(12):1100-1106.
6. Dumas HM, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Haley SM, et al. Computer adaptive test performance in children with and without disabilities: prospective field study of the PEDI-CAT [published ahead of print October 12, 2011]. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):393-401.
7. Berg M, Jahnsen R, Froslie K, Hussain A. Reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2004;24:61-77. (Pubitemid 39100864)
8. Nichols D, Case-Smith J. Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1996;8:15-24. (Pubitemid 26079022)
9. Erkin G, Elhan A, Aybay C, Sirzai H, Ozel S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29;1271-1279. (Pubitemid 47189920)
10. Ziviani J, Ottenbacher K, Shephard K, Foreman S, Astbury W, Ireland P. Concurrent validity of the Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disabilities Inventory in children with developmental disabilities and acquired brain injuries. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;21:91-101. (Pubitemid 34461313)
11. Berg M, Aamodt G, Stanghelle J, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Hussain A. Cross-cultural validation of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) norms in a randomized Norwegian population. Scand J Occup Ther. 2008;15(3):143-152.
12. Chen KL, Tseng MH, Hu FC, Koh CL. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory: a cross-cultural comparison of daily function between Taiwanese and American children. ResDev Disabil. 2010;31(6): 1590-1600.
13. Galvin J, Lim BC, Steer K, Edwards J, Lee KJ. Predictors of functional ability of Australian children with acquired brain injury following inpatient rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 2010;24(7-8):1008-1016.
14. Stahlhut M, Christensen J, Aadahl M. Applicability and intrarespondent reliability of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory in a random Danish sample. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(2):161-169.
15. Han T,GrayN, Vasquez MM, Zou LP, Shen K, Duncan B. Comparison of the GMFM-66 and the PEDI functional Skills Mobility domain in a group of Chinese children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(3):398-403.
16. Stahlhut M, Gard G, Aadahl M, Christensen J. Discriminative validity of the Danish version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31(1):78-89.
17. Wren TA, Sheng M, Bowen RE, et al. Concurrent and discriminant validity of Spanish language instruments for measuring functional health status. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(2):199-212. (Pubitemid 351498929)
18. Kothari DH, Haley SM, Gill-Body KM, Dumas HM. Measuring functional change in children with acquired brain injury (ABI): comparison of generic and ABI-specific scales using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Phys Ther. 2003;83:776-785. (Pubitemid 37243537)
19. McCarthy ML, Silberstein CE, Atkins EA, Harryman SE, Sponseller PD, Hadley-Miller NA. Comparing reliability and validity of pediatric instruments for measuring health and well-being of children with spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44: 468-476. (Pubitemid 34808754)
20. Østensjo S, Bjorbaekmo W, Carlberg EB, Vollestad NK. Assessment of everyday functioning in young children with disabilities: an ICF-based analysis of concepts and content of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Disabil Rehabil. 2006;30: 489-504. (Pubitemid 43347891)
21. Dumas HM, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Tian F, Haley SM. A preliminary evaluation of the PEDI-CAT mobility item bank for children using walking aids and wheelchairs. J Pedi Rehabil Med. In press.
22. Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther. 1990;70(10):602-610. (Pubitemid 20330188)
23. Wan L, Keng L, McClarty K, Davis L. Methods of comparability studies for computerized and paper-based tests. Test Measurement Res Serv. 2009; Dec(10):1-4.