How Brianna Became Bossy and Kofi Came Out Smart: Understanding the Trajectories of Identity and Engagement for Two Group Leaders in a Project-Based Mathematics Classroom

Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 207-225

  Langer Osuna, Jennifer M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859314340     PISSN: 14926156     EISSN: 19424051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14926156.2011.595881     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldbery, N. and Tarule, J. 1997. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice & mind, New York, NY: Basic Books.
2. Bianchini, J. A. 1999. From here to equity: The influence of status on student access to and understanding of science. Science Education, 83(5): 577-601.
3. Chizhik, W. 2001. Equity and status in group collaboration: Learning through explanations depends on task characteristics. Social Psychology of Education, 5: 179-200.
4. Clark, H. H. 1996. Using language, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, E. and Lotan, R. 1995. Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1): 99-120.
6. Davies, B. and Harré, R. 1990. Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20: 43-63.
7. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R. and Sherin, B. L. 2010. Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1): 3-53.
8. Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. and McKinney de Royston, M. 2008. "Toward a model of differential influence in discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, and access within a heated classroom argument". In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edited by: Love, B. C., McRae, K. and Sloutsky, V. M. 2010-2015. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
9. Erickson, F. 2006. "Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales". In Handbook on complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-191), Edited by: Green, J. L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P. B. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Erickson, F. and Schultz, J. 1997. "What is context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence". In Mind, culture, and activity (pp. 22-31), Edited by: Cole, M., Engestrom, Y. and Vasquez, O. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Esmonde, I. 2009. Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2): 1008-1043.
12. Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P. and Hammer, T. J. 1990. Making connections: The relational lives of girls at Emma Willard School, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Goodwin, M. H. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
14. Herrenkohl, L. R. and Guerra, M. R. 1998. Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4): 431-473.
15. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D. and Cain, C. 2001. Identity and agency in cultural worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Humphreys, P. and Berger, J. 1981. Theoretical consequences of the status characteristics formulation. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5): 953-983.
17. Inglis, M. and Mejia-Ramos, J. P. 2009. The effect of authority on the persuasiveness of mathematical arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 27(1): 25-50.
18. Jack, D. C. 1991. Silencing the self: Women and depression, New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
19. Jurow, A. S. 2005. Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students' participation in an architectural design project. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1): 35-67.
20. Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W. and Palinscar, A. S. 2002. The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education, 86: 287-313.
21. Langer-Osuna, J. M. 2009. The algebra of identity: Toward a new framework for understanding the co-construction of identity and engagement in mathematics classrooms, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Berkeley: University of California.
22. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Leander, K. M. 2002. Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes, 34(2): 193-235.
24. Lubienski, S. T. 2002. Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3): 103-125
25. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. "Principles and standards for school mathematics". Reston, VA: NCTM.
26. Southerland, J., Kittleson, J., Settlage, J. and Lanier, K. 2005. Individual and group meaning-making in an urban third grade classroom: Red fog, cold cans, and seeping vapor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9): 1032-1061.
27. Webb, N. M. 1991. Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5): 366-389.
28. Webb, N. M. and Mastergeorge, A. M. 2003. The development of students' helping behavior and learning in peer-directed small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 2(14): 361-428.
29. Wortham, S. 2006. Learning identity, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.