Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students' participation in an architectural design project

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 35-67

  Jurow, A Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12844260185     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1401_3     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271 -311.
2. Becker, H. S., Geer, B., & Hughes, E. C. (1968). Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New York: Wiley.
3. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
4. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41-62.
5. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315.
8. de la Rocha, O. L. (1986). Problems of sense and problems of scale: An ethnographic study of arithmetic in everyday life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
9. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
10. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). London: Cambridge University Press.
11. Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153-181). New York: Academic.
12. Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Milroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201-225). San Diego, CA: Academic.
13. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. L. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147-160). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2002). Orchestrating the multiple voices and inscriptions of a mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 251-274.
15. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
16. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17. Goldman, S., Knudsen, J., & Latvala, M. (1998). Engaging middle schoolers in and through real-world mathematics. In L. Leutzinger (Ed.), Mathematics in the middle (pp. 129-140). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
18. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
19. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283-307.
20. Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361-367.
21. Greeno, J. G., & Middle School Mathematics through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
22. Hall, R. (1999). Following mathematical practices in design-oriented work. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 29-47). London: Falmer.
23. Hall, R. (2000). Work at the interface between representing and represented worlds in middle school mathematics design projects. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 675-680). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Hall, R., & Rubin, A. (1998). . .there's five little notches in here: Dilemmas in teaching and learning the conventional structure of rate. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 189-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
26. Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (science) classroom. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 221-227). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Holland, D., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. John, A. S. (2001). Generalizing in interaction: Students making and using generalizations in design projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
30. John, A. S., Luporini, D., & Lyon, L. (1997, March). Making, interpreting, and animating graphical representations in an architectural design project. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
31. John, A. S., Torralba, J. A., & Hall, R. (1999, April). Comparing logics of participation: Working at the boundary between errors and findings in classroom and professional ecology. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
32. Jurow, A. S. (2002). Generalizing in interaction: Mathematical generalizing in and through classroom discourse. In. P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 183-190). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Talking science within design: Learning through design as a context for situating children's scientific discourse. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 323-363.
34. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, C., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning-by-Design™ into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495-548.
35. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313-350.
36. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de laRocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.). Everyday cognition: Development in social context (pp. 67-94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358.
40. McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted actions and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 244-275.
41. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Middle School Mathematics through Applications Project. (1996). The Antarctica Project. Palo Alto, CA: The Institute for Research on Learning.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44. Nemirovsky, R. (1994). On ways of symbolizing: The case of Laura and velocity sign. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 389-422.
45. Newman, D. (1997). Functional environments for microcomputers in education. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 279-291). New York: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 7, 52-57, 1985)
46. Newman, D. (1997). Functional environments for microcomputers in education. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (pp. 279-291). New York: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted from The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 7, 52-57, 1985)
47. Ochs, E., Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1994). Interpretive journeys: How physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, 1, 151-171.
48. Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429-449.
49. Saxe, G. B. (1991). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
50. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' understandings of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131-166.
51. Skinner, D., Valsiner, J., & Holland, D. (2001, September). Discerning the dialogical self: A theoretical and methodological examination of a Nepali adolescent's narrative. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research] [On-line serial], 2(3). Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-01/3-01skinneretal-e.htm
52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. and Trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.