Response to Intervention: The Changing Role of School Psychologists in Relation to Gifted Students

Journal of Applied School Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 341-358

  King, Emily W ^a   Coleman, Mary Ruth ^b,c   Miller, Adena ^d  

^a Southeast Family Services of Raleigh   (United States)

^b FPG Child Development Institute   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d Colorado Department of Education ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

gifted students; response to intervention (RtI); school psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859302842     PISSN: 15377903     EISSN: 15377911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15377903.2011.616578     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Baum, S. M. and Owen, S. V. 2004. To be gifted & learning disabled, Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
2. Bradley, R., Danielson, L. and Doolittle, J. 2005. Response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38: 485-486.
3. Bridges, W. 1991. Managing transitions: Making the most of change, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Burns, M. K. 2010. Response-to-intervention research: Is the sum of parts as great as the whole?. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 36(2): 13-15.
5. Burns, M. K. and Coolong-Chaffin, M. 2006. Response to intervention: The role of and effect on school psychology. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 1: 3-15.
6. Byrd, S. 2011. Educating and involving parents in the response to intervention process: The schools important role. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43: 32-39.
7. Canter, A. 2006. Problem solving and RTI: New roles for school psychologists. NASP Communique, 34(5)
8. Case, L. P., Speece, D. L. and Malloy, D. E. 2003. The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32: 557-582.
9. Coleman, M. R., Buysse, V. and Neitzel, J. 2006. Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at risk for learning disabilities. Full report, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
10. Coleman, M. R. and Hughes, C. 2009. Meeting the needs of gifted students with RtI framework. Gifted Child Today, 32(3): 14-17.
11. Coleman, M. R., Roth, F. P. and West, T. 2009. Roadmap to RTI: Applying response to intervention in preschool settings, New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
12. Coleman, M. R. and Shah-Coltrane, S. 2010a. U-STARS~PLUS: Family science packets, Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
13. Coleman, M. R. and Shah-Coltrane, S. 2010b. U-STARS~PLUS: Science & literature connections, Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
14. Coleman, M. R. and Shah-Coltrane, S. 2011a. "Remembering the importance of potential: Tiers 1 and 2". In RtI for gifted students, A CEC-TAG educational resource, Edited by: Coleman, M. R. and Johnsen, S. K. 43-62. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
15. Coleman, M. R. and Shah-Coltrane, S. 2011b. U-STARS~PLUS: Professional development kit manual, Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
16. Coleman, M. R., Shah-Coltrane, S. and Harrison, A. 2010. U-STARS~PLUS: A guide to TOPS, Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
17. Colorado Department of Education. 2008. Response to intervention: A practitioners guide to implementation, Denver, CO: Author.
18. Dexter, D. D. and Hughes, C. A. 2009. Progress monitoring and identifying non-responders in Tier 2 Retrieved fromhttp://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/research/researchreview
19. Ford, D. and Moore, J. 2004. Creating culturally responsive gifted education classrooms: Understanding "culture" is the first step. Gifted Child Today, 27(4): 34-39.
20. Ford, D. and Whiting, G. 2010. Beyond testing: Social and psychological considerations in recruiting and retaining gifted black students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1): 131-155.
21. Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. 2002. Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying non-responders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(4): 48-52.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. and Prentice, K. 2004. Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37: 293-306.
23. Grantham, T. C., Ford, D. Y. and Henfield, M. S. 2011. "Discovering gifted potential in black students". In Gifted & advanced black students in school, Edited by: Grantham, T. C., Ford, D. Y., Henfield, M. S., Scott, M. T., Harmon, D. A., Porcher, S. and Price, C. 81-83. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
24. Griffin, J. and Hattendorf, R. 2010. Successful RTI implementation in middle schools. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, Spring: 30-34.
25. Hall, S. L. and Batsche, G. M. 2010. Theme editors' summary: Addressing the challenges of implementing response to intervention (RTI). Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 36(2): 7-8.
26. Hertzog, N. 2005. Equity and access: Creating general education classrooms responsive to potential giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29: 213-257.
27. Hughes, C. E. and Rollins, K. 2009. RtI for nurturing giftedness: Implications for the RtI school-based team. Gifted Child Today, 32(3): 31-39.
28. Hughes, C. E., Rollins, K., Johnsen, S. K., Pereles, D., Omdal, S., Baldwin, L. and Coleman, M. R. 2009. Remaining challenges for the use of RtI with gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 32(3): 58-61.
29. Hughes, C. E., Rollins, K., Johnsen, S. K., Pereles, D., Omdal, S., Baldwin, L. and Coleman, M. R. 2011. "Challenges for including gifted education within an RtI model". In RtI for gifted students, A CEC-TAG educational resource, Edited by: Coleman, M. R. and Johnsen, S. K. 119-127. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
30. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. 1990. 20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.
31. Johnsen, S. 2011. "Assessing your school's RtI model in serving gifted students". In RtI for gifted students, A CEC-TAG educational resource, Edited by: Coleman, M. R. and Johnsen, S. K. 119-127. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
32. Justice, L. M. 2006. Evidence-based practice, response to intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37: 284-297.
33. Kirk, S., Gallagher, J., Coleman, M. R. and Anastasiow, N. 2012. Educating exceptional children, 13th ed., Belmont, CA: Cengage.
34. Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M. and Canter, A. 2003. Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18: 187-200.
35. Murphy, J. J. 2008. Best practices in conducting brief counseling with students. Best Practices in School Psychology V, 4: 1439-1456.
36. National Association for Gifted Children. 2009. State of the states in gifted education: National policy and practice data, Washington, DC: The Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted.
37. National Association of School Psychologists. 2003. Position statement on mental health services in the schools, Bethesda, MD: Author.
38. National Association of School Psychologists. 2008. Early childhood services, Bethesda, MD: Author.
39. National Association of School Psychologists. 2010. National association of school psychologists model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. School Psychology Review, 39: 320-333.
40. Neihart, M. 2008. "Identifying and providing services to twice exceptional children". In Handbook of giftedness in children, Edited by: Pfeiffer, S. I. 115-138. New York, NY: Springer.
41. Nielson, M. E. 2002. Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10(2): 93-111.
42. O'Connor, R. 2000. Increasing the intensity of intervention in Kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1): 43-54.
43. Peine, M. and Coleman, L. 2010. The phenomenon of waiting in class. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34: 220-244.
44. Pereles, D., Baldwin, L. and Omdal, S. 2011. "Addressing the needs of students who are twice-exceptional". In RtI for gifted students, A CEC-TAG educational resource, Edited by: Coleman, M. R. and Johnsen, S. K. 63-86. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
45. Pereles, D., Omdal, S. and Baldwin, L. 2009. Response to intervention and twice exceptional learners: A promising fit. Gifted Child Today, 32(3): 40-51.
46. Peters, S. and Gentry, M. 2010. Multigroup construct validity evidence of the HOPE scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54: 298-313.
47. Pfeiffer, S. I. 2001. Professional psychology and the gifted: Emerging practice opportunities. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 32: 175-181.
48. Pfeiffer, S. I. 2008. Handbook of giftedness in children, New York, NY: Springer.
49. Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y. and Kumtepe, A. 2008. The gifted rating scales-School form: A validation study based on age, gender and race. Roeper Review, 30: 140-146.
50. Rollins, K., Mursky, C. and Johnsen, S. 2011. "State RtI models for gifted children". In RtI for gifted students, A CEC-TAG educational resource, Edited by: Coleman, M. R. and Johnsen, S. K. 119-127. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
51. Tilly, D. 2009. Questions and answers on response to intervention. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 50(4): 712
52. Vespi, L. and Yewchuk, C. 1992. A phenomological study of the social/emotional characteristics of gifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1): 55-72.
53. Weinfeld, R., Barnes-Robinson, L., Jeweler, S. and Shevitz, B. 2006. Smart kids with learning difficulties: Overcoming obstacles and realizing potential, Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.