Addressing the needs of students who are twice-exceptional

RtI for Gifted Students: A CEC-TAG Educational Resource

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 63-86

  Pereles, Daphne ^a   Baldwin, Lois ^b   Omdal, Stuart ^c  

^a Colorado Department of Education ^*  (United States)

^b Association for the Education for Gifted Underachieving Students   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85120386671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003237785-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Baldwin, L. (1995). Portraits of gifted learning disabled students: A longitudinal study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
2. Baum, S., Cooper, C., & Neu, T. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477-490.
3. Baum, S. M., & Owen, S. V. (2004). To be gifted & learning disabled. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
4. Cole, R. W. (2008). Educating everybody’s children: Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
5. Colorado Department of Education. (2008). Response to Intervention: A practitioner’s guide to implementation. Denver, CO: Author.
6. Colorado Department of Education (2009) Response to Intervention: Problem-solving/consultation process training video guide. Denver, CO: Author
7. Council for Exceptional Children. (2008). Council for Exceptional Children 2008policy manual. Arlington, VA: Author.
8. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. Law 94-142 (November 29, 1975).
9. Healey, W. C. (2005). The learning disability phenomenon in pursuit of axioms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 115-118.
10. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.
11. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. Law 108-446 (December 3, 2004).
12. Lauchlan, E, & Boyle, C., (2007). Is the use of labels in special education helpful?. Support for Learning, 22(1), 36-42.
13. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction thatworks: Research-based strategies for increasingstu-dent achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
14. McCoach, D. B., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Siegle, D. (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning dis-abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 403-411.
15. National Association for Gifted Children. (2010). 2010 pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards Retrieved from http://www nagc. org/uploadedFiles/Information_and_Resources/Gifted_Program_ Standards/K-12%20programming%20standards. pdf
16. National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to Intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
17. Neu, T. (2003). When the gifts are camouflaged by disability: Identifying and developing the talent in gifted students with disabilities. In J. A. Castellano (Ed.), Special populations in gifted education: Working with diverse gifted learners (pp. 151-162). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Nielsen, M. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10(2), 93-111.
19. Office of the Federal Register. (2006). Specific learning disabilities. Rules and Regulations 71(156), 46647.
20. Reis, S M, McGuire, J M, & Neu, T W (2000) Compensation strate-gies used by high ability students with learning disabilities who suc-ceed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 123-134.
21. Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
22. Renzulli, J. S., Reis, S. M., & Smith, L. H. (1981). The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
23. Truscott, S D, Catanese, A M, & Abrams, L M (2005) Te evolving context of special education classiication in the United States School Psychology International, 26, 162-177.
24. Weinfeld, R., Barnes-Robinson, L., Jeweler, S., & Roffman Shevitz, B. (2006). Smart kids with learning difficulties: Overcoming obstacles and realizing potential. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.