The Validity of a Response-to-Instruction Paradigm to Identify Reading Disabilities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Individual Differences and Contextual Factors

School Psychology Review

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 557-582

  Case, Lisa Pericola ^a   Speece, Deborah L ^a   Molloy, Dawn Eddy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742288992     PISSN: 02796015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Benes, K. M. (1995). [Review of the Social Skills Rating System.] In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.). The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 965-967). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
2. Bernard, H. R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Deno, S. L. (1985), Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
6. Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement; Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: The Guilford Press.
7. Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L.S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.
8. Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in gifted and special education, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Duncan, G. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychologist, 34, 29-41.
10. Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177.
11. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (2001, April). Educating exceptional children: A statistical profile. Arlington, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
12. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D. J., Fowler, A. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23.
13. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to academic diversity. The American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
14. Fuchs, L. S. (1995, May). Incorporating curriculum-based measurement into the eligibility decision-making process: A focus on treatment validity and student growth. Paper presented at the Workshop on IQ Testing and Educational Decision Making, National Research Council, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
16. nd ed.) Macintosh version [Computer software]. Austin TX: PRO-ED.
17. Furlong, M., & Karno, M. (1995). [Review of the Social Skills Rating System.] In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.). The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 967-969). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
18. Gallimore, R., Goldenberg, C. N., & Weisner, T. S. (1993). The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology, American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 537-559.
19. Gerber, M. (2002). A meta-research commentary on MacMillian and Siperstein's "Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. " In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 341350). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Greenwood, C. R. (1996). Research on the practices and behavior of effective teachers at the Juniper gardens children's project: Implications for the education of diverse learners. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies (pp. 39-79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Gresham, F. M. & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
22. Gresham, F. M., & Witt, J. C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 249-267.
23. Jenkins, J. R., & O'Connor, R. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 99-149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kavale, K. A., & Fomess, S. R. (1995). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Keogh, B. K., & Speece, D. L. (1996). Learning disabilities within the context of schooling. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 1-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Li, S., & Zercher, C. (1997, November). Data analysis strategies and issues in mixed method research. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, San Diego, CA.
27. Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1986). Reading disability research: An interactionist perspective. Review of Educational Research, 56, 111-136.
28. MacMillan, D. L., & Siperstein, G. N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 287-333). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Mathes, P. G., Grek, M. L., Howard, J. K., Babyak, A. E., & Allen, S. H. (1999). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: A tool for preventing early reading failure. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 50-60.
30. Maughan, B. (1988). School experiences as risk/protective factors. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Studies of psychosocial risk: The power of longitudinal data (pp. 200-220). New York: Cambridge.
31. McKinney, J. D., Mason, J., Perkerson, K., & Clifford, M. (1975). The relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 198-203.
32. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study reseach in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
33. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. National Reading Panel. (2000). Summary report, Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
35. President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Retrieved July 10, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/ commissionsboards/whspecialeducation.
36. Rothbart, M. K., & Jones, L. B. (1999). Temperament: Developmental perspectives. In R. Gallimore, L. P. Bernheimer, D. L. MacMillan, D. L. Speece, & S. Vaughan (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high incidence disabilities (pp. 33-53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
38. SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 8. Carey, NC: Author.
39. rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
40. Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75-107). Timonium, MD: York Press.
41. Scarr, S. (1981). Testing for children: Assessment and the many determinants of intellectual competence. American Psychologist, 36, 1159-1166.
42. Schatschneider, C., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Mehta, P. (1999). The dimensionality of phonological awareness: An application of item response theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 439449.
43. Share, D. L., McGee, R., & Silva, P. (1989). IQ and reading progress: A test of the capacity notion of IQ. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 97-100.
44. Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Escobar, M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998-1002.
45. Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: The Guilford Press.
46. Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201-215.
47. Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
48. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
49. Speece, D. L., & Shekitka, L. (2002). How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of experts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 118-123.
50. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
51. Steubing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., LeDoux, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-Discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469-518.
52. Torgesen, J. K., & Burgess, S. R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 161-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner R. K. (1997). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processes (norming version). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
54. Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (1998). Alternative diagnostic approaches for specific developmental reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 220-232.
55. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E. R., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
56. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Chen, R., Pratt, A., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, N. P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83-103.
59. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
60. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
61. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
62. Woodcock, R. W. & Mather, N. (1989/1990). Woodcock-Johnson Revised Tests of Achievement: Examiner's manual. In R. W. Woodcock & M. B. Johnson, Wood-cock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
63. Ysseldyke, J., & Christenson, S. (1993). The Instructional Environment System-II. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.