Remembering the importance of potential: Tiers 1 and 2

RtI for Gifted Students: A CEC-TAG Educational Resource

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 43-61

  Coleman, Mary Ruth ^a   Shah Coltrane, Sneha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b N Carolina Dept of Pub Instruct   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859338735     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003237785-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26, 214-239.
2. Baldwin, A. Y. (2007). Te untapped potential for excellence. In J. VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 23-25). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
3. Basile, C. G. (1999). Collecting data outdoors: Making connections to the real world. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(1), 8-11.
4. Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). Autonomous Learner Model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.
5. Blanchett, W. J., Klinger, J. K., & Harry, B. (2009). Te intersection of race, culture, language, and disability: Implications for urban educa-tion. Urban Education, 44, 389-409.
6. Bristow, W. H., Craig, M. L., Hallock, G. T., & Laycock, S. R. (1951). Identifying gifted children. In P. Witty (Ed.), Te gifted child (pp. 10-19). Boston, MA: D C Heath and Company
7. Carlson, C. (2000). Scientific literacy for all: Helping English language learners make sense of academic language. Science Teacher, 67(3), 48-52
8. Coleman, M. R., & Harrison, A. (1997). Programming for gifted learners: Developing a system level plan for service delivery Chapel Hill: Te University of North Carolina.
9. Coleman, M., Roth, F., & West, T. (2009). Roadmap to pre-k RTI: Applying response to intervention in preschool settings. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities
10. Coleman, M. R., & Shah-Coltrane, S. (2010a). U-STARS~PLUS family science packets. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children
11. Coleman, M. R., & Shah-Coltrane, S. (2010b). U-STARS~PLUS pro-fessional development kit. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children
12. Coleman, M. R., & Shah-Coltrane, S. (2010c). U-STARS~PLUS science & literature connections. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children
13. Coleman, M. R., Shah-Coltrane, S., Harradine, C., & Timmons, L A. (2007). Impact of poverty on promising learners, their teachers, and their schools. In J. VanTassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 59-61). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children
14. Coleman, M. R., Shah-Coltrane, S., & Harrison, A. (2010a). Teacher’s observation of potential in students: Individual student form. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children
15. Coleman, M. R., Shah-Coltrane, S., & Harrison, A. (2010b). Teacher’s observation of potential in students: Whole class form. Arlington, VA:
16. Council for Exceptional Children Donnellan, K., & Roberts, G. (1985). What research says: Activity-based elementary science: A double bonus. Science and Children 22(4), 119-121
17. Ford, D. Y. (2007). Diamonds in the rough: Recognizing and meeting the needs of gifted children from low SES backgrounds. In J. VanTassel-Baska & T Stambaugh (Eds), Overlooked gems: A national perspec-tive on low-income promising learners (pp. 37-41). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children
18. Ford, D. Y., & Grantham, T. C. (2003). Providing access for culturally diverse gifted students: From deficit to dynamic thinking. Theory Into Practice, 42, 217-225.
19. Fuchs, L S, & Fuchs, D (2006) A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621-626.
20. Gallagher, J., & Gallagher, S. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Paramount
21. Henfield, M. S., Washington, A. R., & Owens, D. (2010). To be or not to be gifted: The choice for a new generation. Gifted Child Today, 32(2), 17-25.
22. Hertzog, N. (2005). Equity and access: Creating general education classrooms responsive to potential giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 213-257.
23. Kirk, S, Gallagher, J, Coleman, M R, & Anastasiow, N (2009) Educating exceptional children (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, 2 vols. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. (Government Documents, Y4. L 11/2: G36)
25. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U. S.
26. Government Printing Oice National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. National Research Council. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
28. Nyberg, L., & McCloskey, S. (2008). Integration with integrity. Science & Children, 46(3), 46-49.
29. Renzulli, J., & Reis, S. (2002). What is school-wide enrichment? How gifted programs relate to school improvement. Gifted Child Today, 25(4), 18-25.
30. Shah-Coltrane, S., & Coleman, M. R. (2005, Fall/Winter). Using sci-ence as a vehicle: Search for outstanding potential in underserved populations. Gifted Education Communicator, 36, 20-23.
31. Simich-Dudgeon, C, & Egbert, J (2000) Science as a second language: Verbal interactive strategies help English language learners develop academic vocabulary Science Teacher, 67(3), 28-32.
32. The Association for the Gifted. (2009). Diversity and developing gifts and talents: A national call to action. Retrieved from http://www cectag org
33. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
34. VanTassel-Baska, J, & Little, C A (Eds) (2011) Content-based cur-riculum for high-ability learners (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
35. Witty, P. (Ed). (1951). Te gifted child. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath and Company