A unified multitask architecture for predicting local protein properties

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Qi, Yanjun ^a   Oja, Merja ^b,d   Weston, Jason ^c   Noble, William Stafford ^b  

^a NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c GOOGLE INC   (United States)

^d VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SIGNAL PEPTIDE; SOLVENT; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DNA BINDING MOTIF; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MULTITASK LEARNING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84858841519     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032235     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Collobert R, Weston J, (2008) A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
2. Caruana R, (1997) Multitask learning. Machine Learning 28: 41-75.
3. Bengio Y, Ducharme R, Vincent P, (2000) A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 1137-1155.
4. Collobert R, Weston J, (2007) Fast semantic extraction using a novel neural network architecture. pp. 25-32 In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Qian N, Sejnowski TJ, (1988) Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. Journal of Molecular Biology 202: 865-884.
6. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL, (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. Journal of Molecular Biology 305: 567-80.
7. Ofran Y, Rost B, (2007) Prediction of DNA-binding residues from sequence. Bioinformatics 23: i347-i353.
8. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J, (2005) Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 59: 467-475.
9. Rost B, Sander C, (1993) Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. Journal of Molecular Biology 232: 584-99.
10. Cuff JA, Barton GJ, (2000) Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 40: 502-511.
11. Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ, (2008) The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Research 36: W197-W201.
12. Jones DT, (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. Journal of Molecular Biology 292: 195-202.
13. Katzman S, Barrett C, Thiltgen G, Karchin R, Karplus K, (2008) PREDICT-2ND: a tool for generalized protein local structure prediction. Bioinformatics 24: 2453-2459.
14. Chu W, Ghahramani Z, Podtelezhnikov A, Wild DL, (2006) Bayesian segmental models with multiple sequence alignment profiles for protein secondary structure and contact map prediction. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics 3: 98-113.
15. Yao XQ, Zhu H, She ZS, (2008) A dynamic bayesian network approach to protein secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9.
16. Cuff JA, Barton GJ, (1999) Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 34: 508-519.
17. Kabsch W, Sander C, (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
18. Kountouris P, Hirst JD, (2009) Prediction of backbone dihedral angles and protein secondary structure using support vector machines. BMC Bioinformatics 10.
19. Zhou Z, Yang B, Hou W, (2010) Association classification algorithm based on structure sequence in protein secondary structure prediction. Expert Systems with Applications.
20. Fagerberg L, Jonasson K, von Heijne G, Uhlén M, Berglund L, (2010) Prediction of the human membrane proteome. Proteomics 10: 1141-9.
21. Bassnett S, Wilmarth PA, David LL, (2009) The membrane proteome of the mouse lens fiber cell. Mol Vis 15: 2448-63.
22. Khanna MR, Stanley BA, Thomas GH, (2010) Towards a membrane proteome in drosophila: a method for the isolation of plasma membrane. BMC Genomics 11: 302.
23. Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, von Heijne G, (1997) Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Engineering 10: 1-6.
24. Nielsen H, Krogh A, (1998) Prediction of signal peptides and signal anchors by a hidden Markov model. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 6: 122-130.
25. Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL, (2004) A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. Journal of Molecular Biology 338: 1027-1036.
26. Reynolds SM, Käll L, Riffle ME, Bilmes JA, Noble WS, (2008) Transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction using dynamic Bayesian networks. PLoS Computational Biology 4: e1000213.
27. Bernsel A, Viklund H, Falk J, Lindahl E, von Heijne G, et al. (2008) Prediction of membraneprotein topology from first principles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 7177-81.
28. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S, (2004) Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. Journal of Molecular Biology 340: 783-95.
29. Rost B, Sander C, (1994) Conservation and prediction of solvent accesibility in protein families. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 20: 216-226.
30. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R, (2002) Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 47: 142-153.
31. Yuan Z, Burrage K, Mattick JS, (2002) Prediction of protein solvent accessibility using support vector machines. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 48: 566-570.
32. Richardson CJ, Barlow D, (1999) The bottom line for prediction of residue solvent accessibility. Protein Engineering Design & Selection 12: 1051-1054.
33. Gianese G, Pascarella S, (2006) A consensus procedure improving solvent accessibility prediction. Journal of Computational Chemistry 27: 621-626.
34. Rost B, Sander C, (1994) Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins-Structure Function and Genetics 20: 216-226.
35. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J, (1991) Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252: 1162-4.
36. Berger B, Wilson D, Wolf E, Tonchev T, Milla M, et al. (1995) Predicting coiled coils by use of pairwise residue correlations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 8259.
37. Wolf E, Kim P, Berger B, (1997) MultiCoil: a program for predicting two-and three-stranded coiled coils. Protein Science 6: 1179.
38. McDonnell AV, Jiang T, Keating AE, Berger B, (2006) Paircoil2: improved prediction of coiled coils from sequence. Bioinformatics 22: 356-358.
39. Delorenzi M, Speed T, (2002) An HMM model for coiled-coil domains and a comparison with PSSM-based predictions. Bioinformatics 18: 617-625.
40. Bartoli L, Fariselli P, Krogh A, Casadio R, (2009) CCHMM PROF: a HMM-based coiled-coil predictor with evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 25: 2757-2763.
41. Wishart DS, Arndt D, Berjanskii M, Guo AC, Shi Y, et al. (2008) PPT-DB: the protein property prediction and testing database. Nucleic Acids Research 36: D222-D229.
42. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A, (2004) Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. Bioinformatics 20: 477-486.
43. Ahmad S, Sarai A, (2005) PSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 6: 33.
44. Mika S, Rost B, (2003) Uniqueprot: Creating representative protein sequence sets. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3789-91.
45. Sander C, Schneider R, (1991) Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9: 56-68.
46. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A, (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology 271: 511-523.
47. Gallet X, Charloteaux B, Thomas A, Brasseur R, (2000) A fast method to predict protein interaction sites from sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 302: 917-926.
48. Yan C, Dobbs D, Honavar V, (2004) A two-stage classifier for identification of protein-protein interface residues. Bioinformatics 20 (Suppl 1): i371-i378.
49. Liang S, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y, (2006) Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Research 34: 3698-3707.
50. Ofran Y, Rost B, (2007) ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinformatics 23: e13-e16.
51. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 3389-3402.
52. Riis SK, Krogh A, (1996) Improving prediction of protein secondary structure using structured neural networks and multiple sequence alignments. Journal of Computational Biology 3: 163-183.
53. Plaut D, Hinton G, (1987) Learning sets of filters using back-propagation* 1. Computer Speech & Language 2: 35-61.
54. Kim H, Park H, (2003) Protein secondary structure prediction based on an improved support vector machines approach. Protein Eng 16: 553-560.
55. Bengio Y, Glorot X, (2010) Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Proceedings of AISTATS 2010 pp. 249-256 volume 9.
56. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89: 10915-10919.
57. Styczynski M, Jensen K, Rigoutsos I, Stephanopoulos G, (2008) Blosum62 miscalculations improve search performance. Nature biotechnology 26: 274-275.
58. Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL, (2007) Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction-the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Research 35: W429.