The effect of remodeling on the kinematics of the malpositioned disc allograft transplantation

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Lam, Stephen K L ^a   Xiao, Jun ^b   Ruan, Dike ^c   Ding, Yu ^c   Lu, William W ^a   Luk, Keith D K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b FIRST MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NAVY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

allograft; intervertebral disc; kinematics; transplantation

Indexed keywords

ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE BOWING; BONE MALFORMATION; BONE REMODELING; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; FLEXOR REFLEX; GOAT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATION; VERTEBRA;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; GOATS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84858797016     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318232909d     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andersson G. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999;14: 581-5. (Pubitemid 29381383)
2. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine 2006;31: 2724-7. (Pubitemid 44673384)
3. Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, et al. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine 2006;31: 1957-63. (Pubitemid 44297776)
4. Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician offi ce visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine 1995;20: 11-9.
5. Katz J. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88: 21-4.
6. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Clements JH, et al. Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65: 213-8. (Pubitemid 13142119)
7. Ricci J, Stewart W, Chee E, et al. Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers. Spine 2006;31: 3052-60. (Pubitemid 46005896)
8. Freburger J, Holmes G, Agans R, et al. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2009;169: 251-8.
9. Bendix T, Kjaer P, Korsholm L. Burned-out discs stop hurting: fact or fiction? Spine 2008;33: E962-7.
10. de Schepper E, Damen J, van Meurs JB, et al. The association between lumbar disc degeneration and low back pain: the influence of age, gender, and individual radiographic features. Spine 2010;35: 531-6.
11. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, et al. Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2000;25: 487-92. (Pubitemid 30115569)
12. Samartzis D, Karppinen J, Mok F, et al. A population-based study of juvenile disc degeneration and its association with overweight and obesity, low back pain, and diminished functional status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93: 662-70.
13. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 2004;4: 190S-4S. (Pubitemid 39497304)
14. Hoogendoorn RJ, Helder MN, Wuisman PI, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration: observations in a goat spinal fusion study. Spine 2008;33: 1337-43.
15. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86: 1497-503. (Pubitemid 38886539)
16. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29: 1938-44. (Pubitemid 39181056)
17. Throckmorton TW, Hilibrand AS, Mencio GA, et al. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28: 2546-50. (Pubitemid 37448973)
18. Freeman BJ, Davenport J. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006;15 (suppl 3): S439-47. (Pubitemid 44371023)
19. Luk KD, Ruan DK. Intervertebral disc transplantation: a biological approach to motion preservation. Eur Spine J 2008;17: 504-10.
20. Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L, et al. Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Spine 2008;33: 1276-83. (Pubitemid 351698807)
21. Punt I, Visser V, van Rhijn L, et al. Complications and reoperations of the SB CHARITÉ lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 2008;17: 36-43. (Pubitemid 351187675)
22. Putzier M, Funk J, Schneider S, et al. CHARITÉ total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 2006;15: 183-95.
23. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB CHARITÉ disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16: 369-83.
24. Luk KDK, Ruan DK, Lu DS, et al. Fresh frozen intervertebral disc allografting in a bipedal animal model. Spine 2003;28: 864-9. (Pubitemid 36542751)
25. Anderson PA, Subach BR, Riew KD. Predictors of outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a multivariate analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34: 161-6.
26. Sasso RC, Best NM. Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21: 19-22.
27. Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, et al. Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21: 393-9.
28. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20: 481-91. (Pubitemid 47524952)
29. Lee CK, Goel VK. Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria. Spine J 2004;4: 209S-18S. (Pubitemid 39497307)
30. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, et al. Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4: 98-105. (Pubitemid 47325298)
31. Sekhon LH, Sears W, Duggal N. Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3: 335-41.
32. Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36: 721-30.
33. Phillips FM, Garfin SR. Cervical disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30: S27-33. (Pubitemid 41292200)
34. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004;17: E5.
35. Pickett GE, Rouleau JP, Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30: 1949-54. (Pubitemid 41292218)
36. Auerbach JD, Anakwenze OA, Milby AH, et al. Segmental contribution towards total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36: E1593-9.
37. Goel VK, Faizan A, Palepu V, et al. Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement [published online ahead of print May 20, 2011]. Eur Spine J. Doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1816-4.
38. Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Phillips FM, et al. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct vs. two-level fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(23): 1932-9.
39. Martin S, Ghanayem AJ, Tzermiadianos MN, et al. Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight vs. lordotic fusion (Revision 1). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36: 1359-66.
40. Patwardhan AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Tsitsopoulos PP, et al. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis [published online ahead of print September 24, 2010]. Eur Spine J. Doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1575-7.
41. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, et al. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6: 198-209. (Pubitemid 47066071)
42. Mummaneni PV, Robinson JC, Haid RW Jr. Cervical arthroplasty with the PRESTIGE LP cervical disc. Neurosurgery 2007;60: 310-314;discussion 314-5.
43. Riina J, Anderson PA, Holly LT, et al. The effect of an anterior cervical operation for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy on associated headaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91: 1919-23.
44. Anakwenze OA, Auerbach JD, Milby AH, et al. Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34: 2001-7.
45. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33: 1305-12.
46. Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23: 367-71.
47. Peng CW, Quirno M, Bendo JA, et al. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2009;9: 551-5.
48. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, et al. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32: 2933-40;discussion 2941-2. (Pubitemid 350307273)
49. Chan SCW, Lam SKL, Leung VYL, et al. Minimizing cryopreservation-induced loss of disc cell activity for storage of whole intervertebral discs. Eur Cell Mater 2010;19: 273-83.
50. Lam SKL. Biomechanics of the Intervertebral Disc Allograft Transplantation. PhD Thesis. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, 2010.
51. Luk KDK, Ruan DK, Chow DH, et al. Intervertebral disc autografting in a bipedal animal model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;337: 13-26.
52. Ruan D, He Q, Ding Y, et al. Intervertebral disc transplantation in the treatment of degenerative spine disease: a preliminary study. Lancet 2007;369: 993-9. (Pubitemid 46436148)
53. Zhu Q, Larson CR, Sjovold SG, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics. Spine 2007;32: 55-62. (Pubitemid 46058584)
54. Chan SC, Gantenbein-Ritter B, Leung VY, et al. Cryopreserved intervertebral disc with injected bone marrow-derived stromal cells: a feasibility study using organ culture. Spine J 2010;10: 486-96.
55. Niosi CA, Oxland TR. Degenerative mechanics of the lumbar spine. Spine J 2004;4: 202S-8S. (Pubitemid 39497306)
56. Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, et al. Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 1994;19: 1371-80. (Pubitemid 24219941)
57. Cannella M, Arthur A, Allen S, et al. The role of the nucleus pulposus in neutral zone human lumbar intervertebral disc mechanics. J Biomech 2008;41: 2104-11.
58. Matsuzaki H, Wakabayashi K, Ishihara K, et al. Allografting intervertebral discs in dogs: a possible clinical application. Spine 1996;21: 178-83. (Pubitemid 26041214)
59. Bao Q, McCullen G, Higham P, et al. The artificial disc: theory, design, and materials. Biomaterials 1996;17: 1157-67. (Pubitemid 26175592)
60. Farfan HF, Gracovetsky S. The nature of instability. Spine 1984;9: 714-9. (Pubitemid 15190621)
61. Crawford N. Biomechanics of lumbar arthroplasty. Neurosurgery Clin N Am 2005;16: 595-602. (Pubitemid 41766365)
62. Lane JG, Massie JB, Ball ST, et al. Follow-up of osteochondral plug transfers in a goat model: a 6-month study. Am J Sports Med 2004;32: 1440-50. (Pubitemid 39100885)
63. Zhang Y, Drapeau S, An HS, et al. Histological features of the degenerating intervertebral disc in a goat disc-injury model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36: 1519-27.
64. David T. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITÉ artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 2007;32: 661-6. (Pubitemid 46573305)
65. Hu N, Cunningham B, McAfee PC, et al. Porous coated motion cervical disc replacement: a biomechanical, histomorphometric, and biologic wear analysis in a caprine model. Spine 2006;31: 1666-73. (Pubitemid 43999962)
66. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the CHARITÉ artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18: 353-9. (Pubitemid 44378153)
67. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, et al. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 2003;28: S176-85. (Pubitemid 37266723)
68. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30: 1576-1583;discussion E388-90. (Pubitemid 41022418)
69. Rauschmann MA, Thalgott J, Fogarty M, et al. Insertion of the artificial disc replacement: a cadaver study comparing the conventional surgical technique and the use of a navigation system. Spine 2009;34: 1110-5.
70. Zindrick MR, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, et al. An evidence-based medicine approach in determining factors that may affect outcome in lumbar total disc replacement. Spine 2008;33: 1262-9. (Pubitemid 351677625)
71. Alini M, Eisenstein SM, Ito K, et al. Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration? Eur Spine J 2008;17: 2-19. (Pubitemid 351170127)