Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System™: 3-Dimensional kinematics

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-62

  Zhu, Qingan ^a   Larson, Chad R ^a   Sjovold, Simon G ^a   Rosler, David M ^b   Keynan, Ory ^a   Wilson, David R ^a   Cripton, Peter A ^a   Oxland, Thomas R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Archus Orthopedics Inc   (United States)

^c VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Helical axis of motion; Lumbar spine; Range of motion; Total facet arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE STABILIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 33846075629     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250983.91339.9f     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: A multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S170-8.
2. Mayer HM, Korge A. Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S85-91.
3. Oxland TR, et al. A comparative biomechanical investigation of anterior lumbar interbody cages: central and bilateral approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:383-93.
4. Panjabi MM, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: II. Stability provided by eight internal fixation devices. Spine 1988;13:1135-40.
5. Cripton PA, Oxland TR, Zhu QA. Use of helical axis of motion and facet joint load information in the evaluation of non-fusion spinal implants: Concept and preliminary results. Roundtables in Spine Surgery 2005;1:22-30.
6. Cunningham BW, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2003;28:S110-7.
7. Kettler A, et al. Finite helical axes of motion are a useful tool to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine. Eur Spine J 2004;13:553-9.
8. Niosi CA, et al. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the DYNESYS Dynamic stabilization system-An in vitro study. Eur Spine J 2006;15:913-22.
9. Wilke HJ, et al. ISSLS prize winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: a comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements. Spine 2003;28:2585-93.
10. Goertzen DJ, Lane C, Oxland T. Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. An in vitro porcine investigation. J Biomech 2004;37:257-61.
11. Cripton PA, et al. In vitro axial preload application during spine flexibility testing: Towards reduced apparatus-related artefacts. J Biomech 2000;33: 1559-68.
12. Patwardhan AG, et al. Effect of compressive follower preload on the flexion-extension response of the human lumbar spine. J Orthop Res 2003;21: 540-56.
13. Kinzel GL, Hall AS Jr, Hillberry BM. Measurement of the total motion between two body segments. I. Analytical development. J Biomech 1972;5: 93-105.
14. Tello R, Crewson PE. Hypothesis testing II: Means. Radiology 2003;227: 1-4.
15. Wilke HJ, et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 1999;24:755-62.
16. Yang KH, King AI. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine 1984;9:557-65.
17. Adams MA, Hutton WC. The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine. Spine 1981;6:241-8.
18. Lorenz M, Patwardhan A, Vanderby R Jr. Load-bearing characteristics of lumbar facets in normal and surgically altered spinal segments. Spine 1983; 8:122-30.
19. Wilson DC, et al. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 2006;39:348-53.
20. Schendel MJ, et al. Experimental measurement of ligament force, facet force, and segment motion in the human lumbar spine. J Biomech 1993;26: 427-38.
21. Shirazi-Adl A. Finite-element evaluation of contact loads on facets of an L2-L3 lumbar segment in complex loads. Spine 1991;16:533-41.
22. Abumi K, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine 1990;15:1142-7.
23. Gurr KR, McAfee PC, Shih CM. Biomechanical analysis of posterior instrumentation systems after decompressive laminectomy. An unstable calf-spine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:680-91.
24. Kato Y, Panjabi MM, Nibu K. Biomechanical study of lumbar spinal stability after osteoplastic laminectomy. J Spinal Disord 1998;11:146-50.
25. Pintar FA, et al. The biomechanics of lumbar facetectomy under compression-flexion. Spine 1992;17:804-10.
26. Rao RD, et al. Intradiscal pressure and kinematic behavior of lumbar spine after bilateral laminotomy and laminectomy. Spine J 2002;2:320-6.
27. Zander T, et al. Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics. Eur Spine J 2003;12:427-34.
28. Ghiselli G, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1497-1503.
29. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: The consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 2004;4(suppl 6):190S-4S.
30. Park P, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature. Spine 2004;29:1938-44.
31. Throckmorton TW, et al. The impact of adjacent level disc degeneration on health status outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28:2546-50.
32. Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: Influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 2004;29:455-63.
33. Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G. The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine 1999;24: 1820-32.
34. Lee CK, Langrana NA. A review of spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease: Need for alternative treatment approach of disc arthroplasty? Spine J 2004;4(suppl 6):173S-6S.
35. Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 2004;35:43-56.
36. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S170-8.
37. Hashimoto T, et al. Mid-term clinical results of Graf stabilization for lumbar degenerative pathologies. A minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine J 2001;14: 283-9.
38. Gillespie KA, Dickey JP. Biomechanical role of lumbar spine ligaments in flexion and extension: Determination using a parallel linkage robot and a porcine model. Spine 2004;29:1208-16.
39. Haberl H, et al. Kinematic response of lumbar functional spinal units to axial torsion with and without superimposed compression and flexion/extension. Eur Spine J 2004;13:560-6.
40. Mann KA, et al. A biomechanical investigation of short segment spinal fixation for burst fractures with varying degrees of posterior disruption. Spine 1990;15:470-8.
41. Xu H, et al. Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing dynamic pedicle screw fixation device and its equivalent rigid device. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2002;40:737-9.
42. Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Claes L. Range of motion or finite helical axis? Comparison of different methods to describe spinal segmental motion in vitro. Roundtables in Spine Surgery 2005;1:13-21.