Erratum: RE: Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2009;9:551-5 (DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.008);Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement

Spine Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 551-555

  Peng, Chan W B ^a   Quirnoa, Martin ^a   Bendo, John A ^a   Spivak, Jeffrey M ^a   Goldstein, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical disc replacement; Disc height; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CERVICAL DISK REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 67649816848     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Connolly P.J., Esses S.I., and Kostuik J.P. Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord 9 (1996) 202-206
2. Epstein N.E. Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion without plate instrumentation in 178 patients. J Spinal Disord 13 (2000) 1-8
3. Thorell W., Cooper J., Hellbusch L., et al. The long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy with and without intervertebral bone graft placement. Neurosurgery 43 (1998) 268-273
4. Eck J.C., Humphreys S.C., Lim T.H., et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27 (2002) 2431-2434
5. Matsunaga S., Kabayama S., Yamamoto T., et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24 (1999) 670-675
6. Hilibrand A.S., Carlson G.D., Palumbo M.A., Jones P.K., and Bohlman H.H. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 (1999) 519-528
7. Wigfield C., Gill S., Nelson R., et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 96 (2002) 17-21
8. Zhao K., Yang C., Zhao C., et al. Assessment of non-invasive intervertebral motion measurements in the lumbar spine. J Biomech 38 (2005) 1943-1946
9. Baba H., Furusawa N., Imura S., et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 18 (1993) 2167-2173
10. Weinhoffer S.L., Guyer R.D., Herbert M., et al. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20 (1995) 526-531
11. Fujiwara A., Lim T.H., An H.S., et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25 (2000) 3036-3044
12. Tanaka N., An H.S., Lim T.H., et al. The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine J 1 (2001) 47-56
13. McAfee P.C., Cunningham B., Dmitriev A., et al. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 28 (2003) 176-185
14. Shim C.S., Lee S.H., Park H.J., Kang H.S., and Hwang J.H. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19 (2006) 465-470
15. Pickett G.E., Rouleau J.P., and Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30 (2005) 1949-1954
16. Bryan V.E. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 (2002) S92-S97
17. Chang U.K., Kim D.H., Lee M.C., et al. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7 (2007) 40-46
18. Bertagnoli R., Yue J.J., Pfeiffer F., et al. Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2 (2005) 403-410
19. Puttlitz C.M., Rousseau M.A., Xu Z., Hu S., Tay B.K., and Lotz J.C. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine 29 (2004) 2809-2814
20. Porchet F., and Metcalf N.H. Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17 (2004) E6
21. Robertson J.T., and Metcalf N.H. Long-term outcome after implantation of the Prestige I disc in an end-stage indication: 4-year results from a pilot study. Neurosurg Focus 17 (2004) E10
22. Mehren C., Suchomel P., Grochulla F., et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine 31 (2006) 2802-2806
23. Leung C., Casey A.T., Goffin J., et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 57 (2005) 759-762