ACODEA: A framework for the development of classification schemes for automatic classifications of online discussions

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conference Proceedings - Long Papers, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 438-445

  Mu, Jin ^a   Stegmann, Karsten ^a   Mayfield, Elijah ^b   Rosé, Carolyn ^b   Fischer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED ANALYSIS; AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATIONS; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; CODING SCHEME; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS; TEXT CLASSIFICATION; TEXT MINING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84858412147     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Brill, E. (1992). A Simple Rule-Based Part-of-speech Tagger. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. ANLP.
3. Castro, F., Vellido, A., Nebot, A., Minguillon, J., 2005. Detecting atypical student behaviour on an e-learning system. In Simposio Nacional de Tecnologas de la Informacin y las Comunicaciones en la Educacion, Granada, Spain (pp. 153-160).
4. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 343-374.
5. De Laat, M. F., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7-39.
6. Diziol, D.; Walker, E.; Rummel, N.; & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 89-102.
7. Duwairi, R. M. (2006). A framework for the computerized assessment of university student essays. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 381-388. (Pubitemid 43052708)
8. Foltz, P. W., Laham, D., & Landauer, T. K. (1999). Automated essay scoring: Applications to educational technology. In Proceedings of EdMedia. .
9. Gweon, G., Rose, C. P., Zaiss, Z., & Carey, R. (2006). Providing Support for Adaptive Scripting in an On-Line Collaborative Learning Environment, Proceedings of CHI 06: ACM conference on human factors in computer systems. New York: ACM Press.
10. Han, J. & Kamber, M. (2006) Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
11. Klosgen, W., & Zytkow, J. (2002). Handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Kumar, R. & Rosé, C. P. (in press). Architecture for building Conversational Agents that support Collaborative Learning, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies special issue on Intelligent and Innovative Support Systems for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
13. Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support, Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
14. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles Plociy and Practice, 10(3).
15. Mayfield, E. & Rosé, C. P. (2010). An Interactive Tool for Supporting Error Analysis for Text Mining. Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Mayfield, E. & Rosé, C. P. (2010b). Using Feature Construction to Avoid Large Feature Spaces in Text Classification, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference.
17. Mora, G. & Sánchez Peiró, J. A. (2007). Part-of-Speech Tagging Based on Machine Translation Techniques. Proceedings of the 3rd Iberian conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, Part I (pp. 257-264). Girona, Spain.
18. MUC6. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6). Columbia, Maryland. 1995.
19. Poel, M., Stegeman, L. & op den Akker, H. J. A. (2007). A support vector machine approach to dutch partofspeech tagging. In M.R. Berthold, J. Shawe-Taylor, and N. Lavrac(Eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (pp. 274-283.) Springer Verlag, Berlin.
20. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2006). Data mining in e-learning, Southampton, UK: Wit Press.
21. Rosé, C. P., & VanLehn, K. (2005). An Evaluation of a Hybrid Language Understanding Approach for Robust Selection of Tutoring Goals, International Journal of AI in Education,15(4).
22. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y.C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Fischer, F., Weinberger, A., & Stegmann, K. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 3(3), 237-271
23. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-447.
24. Strijbos, J-W, Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., Jochems, W.M.G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48 (Pubitemid 41562936)
25. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.
26. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). CTRL: A research framework for providing adaptive collaborative learning support. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(5), 387-431.
27. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computersupported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95. (Pubitemid 41562938)
28. Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Facilitating computer-supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in netwerk-based knowledge communication in groups. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
29. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506-515.
30. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
31. Witten, I. H. & Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Elsevier: San Francisco