Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community

Instructional Science

Volumn 31, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 7-39

  De Laat, Maarten ^a   Lally, Vic ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Critical event recall; Networked learning; On line communities; Praxis; Theory; Tutoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037214737     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022596100142     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2000). Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conference Context. Retrieved 27/3/01, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/publications.html
2. Barrett, E. & Lally, V. (1999). Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 15: 48-60.
3. Boekaerts, M. & Simons, P.R.J. (1995). Leren en instructie: Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces [Learning and Instruction: Psychology of the Learner and His Learning Process]. Assen: Dekker & Van de Vegt.
4. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1): 32-42.
5. Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences 6: 271-313.
6. Collins, A. & Brown, J.S. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making things visible. American Educator 15(3): 38-46.
7. Collinson, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S. & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison: Atwood.
8. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage.
9. CSCL (2002). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. Retrieved 27/2/02, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/
10. De Laat, M. (2002). Network and Content Analysis in an Online Community Discourse. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell, eds, Networked Learning 2002: A Research Based Conference on E-Leaming in Higher Education and Lifelong Learning, pp. 218-226. Sheffield: Lancaster University and University of Sheffield.
11. De Laat, M., De Jong, F. & Simons, R.-J. (2001). Supporting Self Regulation of Learning Activities in Online Communities of Practice (poster paper). Paper presented at the First European Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Maastricht, Netherlands.
12. De Laat, M., De Jong, F. & Ter Huurne, J. (2000, June 26). Supporting a Community of Practice: The Role of Workers as Learners. Paper presented at the Ed-Media, Montreal, Canada.
13. Dillenbourg, P., ed. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
14. Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen, eds, Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Elliott, J. (2001). Making evidence-based practice educational. British Educational Research Journal 27(5): 555-574.
16. Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol Analyses: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
17. Gartner, A. & Riessman, F. (2000). Peer-Tutoring: Toward a New Model. Retrieved, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.educationplanet.com.
18. Goldstein, L.S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal 36(3): 647-673.
19. Mann, S.J. (2003). A personal inquiry into an experience of adult learning on-line. Instructional Science 31(1-2): 111-125 (this volume).
20. McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning (2nd edn.). London: Kogan Page.
21. Moll, L.C., Tapia, J. & Whitmore, K.P. (1993). Living Knowledge: The social distribution of cultural resources for thinking. In G. Salomon, ed., Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, pp. 139-163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Niven, J., Harris, R.A. & Williams, D. (2002). Motivation to use online learning communities: A methodological outline. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell, eds, Networked Learning 2002: A Research Based Conference on E-Leaming in Higher Education and Lifelong Learning, pp. 474-480. Lancaster and Sheffield: Lancaster University and University of Sheffield UK.
23. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl, ed., Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, pp. 24-32. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Popping, R. (2000). Computer Assisted Text Analysis. London: Sage.
25. Qualitative Solutions and Research (1999). QSR NUD*IST Vivo (NVivo) (Version 1.1). London: Sage.
26. Resnick, L.B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasley, eds, Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 1-20. Arlington VA: American Psychological Association.
27. Rogoff, B. (1995). Apprenticeship in Thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Salomon, G. & Perkins, D.N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education 23: 1-24.
29. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(3): 265-283.
30. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27(2): 4-13.
31. Smith, J.B. (1994). Collective Intelligence in Computer-Based Collaboration. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Sotto, E. (1996). The self-evident nature of teaching. Innovations in Education and Training International 33(3): 203-209.
33. Stahl, G., ed. (2002). Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Stenhouse, L. (1983). Authority, Education and Emancipation. London: Heinemann.
35. Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tuckwell, N.B. (1980). Stimulated Recall: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical and Technical Considerations (Occasional Paper Series 8-2-3). Alberta, Canada: Centre for Research in Teaching.
37. University of Sheffield (2001). MEd in E-Learning (formerly Networked Collaborative Learning) [Web Site]. School of Education. Retrieved 31/07/01, from the World Wide Web: http://www.shef.ac.uk/uni/projects/csnl/medindex.htm
38. Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J. & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10(4): 311-330.
39. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.B. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, Learning Activities and Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen, Netherlands: University of Wageningen.
40. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language (E.H.a.G. Vakar, trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (V.J.-S.M. Cole, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, trans.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction 9(6): 493-516.
43. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). A socioculturel approach to socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine & S.D. Teasley, eds, Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 85-100. Arlington VA: American Psychological Association.
44. Young, M.F., Depalma, A. & Garrett, S. (2002). Situations, interaction, process and affordances: An ecological psychology perspective. Instructional Science 30(1): 47-63.