Development of the Teacher Feedback Observation Scheme: evaluating the quality of feedback in peer groups

Journal of Education for Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 193-208

  Thurlings, Marieke ^a   Vermeulen, Marjan ^a   Kreijns, Karel ^a   Bastiaens, Theo ^b   Stijnen, Sjef ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

feedback patterns; peer coaching; professional development; reciprocal feedback; Teacher Feedback Observation Scheme; teachers; TFOS

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858177185     PISSN: 02607476     EISSN: 13600540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2012.656444     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multi-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3): 227-57.
2. Bereiter, Carl. 2002. Education and mind in the knowledge age, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. 1998a. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1): 7-68.
4. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. 1998b. Inside the black box. Phi Delta Kappan, 80: 139-147.
5. Danchak, M.M., Walther, J.B. and Swan, K.P. Presence in mediated instruction: Bandwidth, behaviour, and expectancy violations. Paper presented at the ALN conference 2001. November16-18, Orlando, FL, USA.
6. Ferreira, A., Moore, J.D. and Mellish, C. 2007. A study of feedback strategies in foreign language classrooms and tutorials with implications for intelligent computer-assisted language learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17: 389-422.
7. Gallacher, Kathleen. 1997. "Supervision, mentoring, and coaching: Methods for supporting personnel development". In Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention: Issues, models, and practical strategies, Edited by: McCollum, J.A. and Catlett, C. 191-214. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.
8. Hattie, John. 2009. Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, London: Routledge.
9. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1): 81-112.
10. Jackson, P. and McKergow, M. 2002. Oplossingsgericht denken [Solution-focused thinking], Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: Thema.
11. Jeninga, J. 2003. "Peer coaching: Van en met elkaar leren als krachtig leermiddel ter bevordering van integrale leerlingbegeleiding and schoolontwikkeling [Peer coaching: To learn from and with each other as a powerful learning mechanism to stimulate integral student coaching and school development]". In Integraal ondersteunen van een vernieuwd VMBO [Integral coaching of new vocational education schools], Edited by: Fanchamps, J. and van de Sanden, J. 25-32. Antwerp: Garant.
12. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. and Jochems, W. 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3): 335-353.
13. Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 159-174.
14. Miles, Matthew B. and Michael Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Mory, Edna H. 2003. "Feedback research revisited". In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, Edited by: Jonassen, D.H. 745-783. New York: MacMillan Library Reference.
16. Organisation for Economic Cooperation, Development (OECD). 2002. Education at a glance 2002: OECD indicators, Paris: OECD.
17. Scheeler, M.C. and Lee, D.L. 2002. Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioural Education, 11(4): 231-241.
18. Scheeler, M.C., Ruhl, K.L. and McAfee, M.K. 2004. Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4): 59-70.
19. Schelfhout, W., Dochy, F. and Janssens, S. 2004. The use of self, peer, and teacher assessment as a feedback system in a learning environment aimed at fostering skills of cooperation in an entrepreneurial context. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2): 177-1201.
20. Smith, P.L. and Ragan, T.J. 1993. "Designing instructional feedback for different learning outcomes". In Interactive instruction and feedback, Edited by: Dempsey, J.V. and Sales, G.C. 75-103. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
21. Warketin, M.E., Sayeed, L. and Hightower, R. 1997. Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28(4): 975-996.
22. Weaver, M.R. 2006. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3): 379-394.
23. White, S. 2009. Articulation and re-articulation: Development of a model for providing quality feedback to pre-service teachers on practicum. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(2): 123-132.
24. Williams, J., Shibanuma, A., Matsuzaki, Y., Kanayama, A. and Ito, A. 2008. Developing a 'feedback cycle' in teacher training: Local networking in English education at Keiwa College. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(4): 307-318.