A study of feedback strategies in foreign language classrooms and tutorials with implications for intelligent computer-assisted language learning systems

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 389-422

  Ferreira, Anita ^a   Moore, Johanna D ^b   Mellish, Chris ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Feedback strategies in foreign language; Intelligent computer assisted language learning; Intelligent tutoring systems for foreign language; Technological applications in applied linguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013587535     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aleven, V., Popescu, O., Ogan, A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2003). A formative classroom evaluation of a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. Supplemental Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 345-355). Sydney, Australia.
2. Allen, J. A., & Core, M. (1997). Draft of DAMSL: Dialog act markup in several layers. Available on: http://www.cs.rochester.edu:80/research/trains/annotation/RevisedManual/RevisedManual.html.
3. Allwright, R. (1975). Problems in the Study of the Language Teacher’s Treatment of Learner Error. TESOL’75 New Directions in Second language learning, teaching and bilingual education (pp. 96-109). Washington, DC.
4. Allwright, R., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Anderson, J., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal ofthe Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
6. Bratt, E. O., Schultz, K., Peters, S., Chen, T., & Pon-Barry, H. (2005). Empirical foundations for intelligent coaching systems. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (pp. 1-12). Orlando, Florida.
7. Bull, S. (1997). Promoting effective learning strategy use in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10(1), 3-39.
8. Chaudron, C. (1977). A Descriptive Model of Discourse in the Corrective Treatment of Learners’ Errors. Language Learning, 27(29), 46-.
9. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second Language Classrooms: Research on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge University Press.
10. Chi, M., Bassok, M., & Lewis, M. (1989). Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science, 15(145), 182-.
11. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
12. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(3), 471-533.
13. Clark, H. H. & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259-294.
14. Core, M., Moore, J., & Zinn, C. (2002). Tutorial Annotation Scheme. Technical Report September 22, University of Edinburgh.
15. Criswell, E., Byrnes, H., & Pfister, G. (1991). Intelligent automated strategies of teaching foreign language in context. In M. Swartz & M. Yazdani (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Foreign Language Learning: The bridge to international communication (pp. 307-319). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
16. Doughty, C. (1994). Focus on form-what is it? Second Language Research Forum, Montreal.
17. Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.) Focus on Form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ellis, R. (1997). he Study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of learner error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10(583), 593-.
20. Farrar, M. (1990). Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 17(3), 607-624.
21. Ferreira-Cabrera, A. (2003). Feedback Strategies for Second Language Teaching with implications for Intelligent Tutorial Systems. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
22. Fox, B. (1993). he Human Tutorial Dialogue Project: Issues in the Design of Instructional Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Garrett, N. (1995). ICALL and Second Language Acquisition. In V. Holland, J. Kaplan & M. Sams (Eds.) Intelligent Language Tutors: Theory shaping technology (pp. 348-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Graesser, A., Lu, S., Jackson, G., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. (2004). Autotutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36,180-193.
25. Holley, F., & King, J. (1974). Imitation and Correction in Foreign Language Learning. In J. Schumann & N. Stenson (Eds.) New frontiers in second language learning (pp. 81-89). Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
26. Hume, G., Michael, J., Rovick, A., & Evens, M. (1996). Hinting as a tactic in one-on-one tutoring. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 23-47.
27. Levin, L., & Evans, D. (1995). ALICE-chan: A case study in ICALL theory and practice. In V. Holland, J. Kaplan & M. Sams (Eds.) Intelligent Language Tutors: Theory shaping technology (pp. 77-97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.) Focus on Form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (1999). How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Long, M. (1977). Teacher feedback on learner error: mapping cognitions. In C.E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.) Talking to children: language input and acquisition (pp. 278-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1997). The Role of Implicit Negative Feedback in SLA: Models and Recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357-371.
32. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2):182-218.
33. Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, Repetition, and Ambiguity in L2 Classroom Discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
34. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.
35. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (1990). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
36. Merrill, D., Reiser, B., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. (1992). Effective Tutoring Techniques: Comparison
37. Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 331-339.
38. Nagata, N. (1995). A study of consciousness-raising by computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback on second language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(3), 337-347.
39. Nagata, N. (1997). The effectiveness of computer-assisted metalinguistic instruction: A case study in japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 187-199.
40. Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., & Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive conceptual tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the wired and wireless future (pp. 256-266). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
41. Rowe, M. (1969). Science, silence and sanctions. Science and Children, 6(6), 12-13.
42. Rowe, M. B. (1987). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. American Educator, 11(38), 43-.
43. Sams, M. (1995). Advanced Technologies for Language Learning: The Bridge project. In V. Holland, J. Kaplan & M. Sams (Eds.) Intelligent Language Tutors: Theory shaping technology (pp. 7-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Schmidt, R., & Frota, N. (1986). Developing Basic Conversational Ability in a Second Language: A Case Study of an Adult Learner of Portuguese. In Day, M (Ed.) Talking to Learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
45. Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of missing ʼno’: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47(547), 583-.
46. Sorace, A. (1985). Metalinguistic Knowledge and Language Use in Acquisition-Poor Environments. Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 239-254.
47. Swain, M. (1985). Commu S. In Gass & C. Madden (Eds.) Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-256). Rowley: MA: Newbury Housenicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its developtment. In.
48. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlehofer (Eds.) For H. G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Tam, Y. C., Mostow, J., Beck, J., & Banerjee, S. (2003). Training a confidence measure for a reading tutor that listens. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 2003) (pp. 3161-3164). ISCA Archive.
50. Tobin, K. (1985). The effect of an extended teacher wait time on science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(469), 475-.
51. Tomlin, R. (1995). Modeling Individual Tutorial Interactions: Theoretical and Empirical Bases of ICALL. In V. Holland, J. Kaplan & M. Sams (Eds.) Intelligent Language Tutors: theory shaping technology (pp. 221-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Van Lier, L. (1988). he Classroom and the Learner. London: Longman.
53. Zinn, C., Moore, J. D., & Core, M. (2005). Intelligent information presentation for tutoring systems. In O. Stock & M. Zancanaro (Eds.) Multimodal Intelligent Information Presentation, volume 27 of Text, Speech and Language Technology (pp. 227-254). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.