Using Technology to Deliver Immediate Corrective Feedback to Preservice Teachers

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 231-241

  Scheeler, Mary Catherine ^a   Lee, David L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingency trials; Feedback; Supervision; Teacher training; Three term

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249109392     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021158805714     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albers, A. E., & Gréer, R. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337-354.
2. nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
3. Baum, D. (1976). An application of the "bug-in-the ear" communication system for training psychometrists. Counselor Education and Supervision, 15, 309-310.
4. Buck, G., Morsink, C., Griffin, C., Hines, T., & Lenk, L. (1992). Preservice training: The role of fieldbased experience in the preparation of effective special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 108-123.
5. Cossairt, A., Hall, V., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The effects of experimenter's instructions, feedback, and praise on teacher praise and student attending behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 89-100.
6. Coulter, G. A., & Grossen, B. (1997). The effectiveness of in-class instructive feedback versus afterclass instructive feedback for teachers learning direct instruction teaching behaviors. Effective School Practices, 16, 21-35.
7. Englert, C. S., & Sugai, G. (1983). Teacher training: Improving performance through peer observation and observation system technology. Teacher Education and Special Education, 6, 7-17.
8. Giebelhaus, C. R. (1994). The mechanical third ear device: A student teaching supervision alternative. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 365-373.
9. Greenwood, C. R., & Maheady, L. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation? Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 265-275.
10. Griffen, C., & Kilgore, K. L. (1995). Framing the problems of practice: The effects of self-assessment in a study of special education students' internships. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18,56-71.
11. Hao, R. (1991). The effects of corrective and non-corrective feedback on changing undesirable verbal teaching behavior. (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52.
12. Heward, W. (1997). Four validated instructional strategies. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 43-418.
13. Hindman, S. E., & Polsgrove, L. (1988). Differential effects of feedback on preservice teacher behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 25-29.
14. Hunt, D. D. (1980). "Bug-in-the-ear" technique for teaching interviewing skills. Journal of Medical Education, 11, 964-966.
15. Korner, I. N., & Brown, W. H. (1952). The mechanical third ear. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 81-84.
16. Lignugaris/Kraft, B., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1993). Evaluation of preservice teachers' interactive teaching skills in a direct instruction practicum using student teachers as supervisors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16, 309-318.
17. Malott, R. W., Whaley, D. L., & Malott, M. E. (1997). Elementary principles of behavior (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Morgan, R. L., Gustafson, K. J., Hudson, P. J., & Salzberg, C. L. (1992). Peer coaching in a preservice special education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 249-258.
19. O'Reilly, M. F, Renzaglia, A., Hutchins, M., Koterba-Bass, L., Clayton, M., Halle, J. W., & Izen, C. (1992). Teaching systematic instruction competencies to special education student teachers: An applied behavioral supervision model. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 104-111.
20. O'Reilly, M. F., Renzaglia, A., & Lee, S. (1994). An analysis of acquisition, generalization and maintenance of systematic instruction competencies by preservice teachers using behavioral supervision techniques. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 22-33.
21. Rosenshine, B. V. & Berliner, D. C. (1978). Academic engaged time. British Journal of Teacher Education, 4, 3-16.
22. Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K., & McAfee, J. (in press). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education.
23. Sharpe, T., Lounsbery, M., & Bahls, V. (1997). Description and effects of sequential behavior practice in teacher education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 68, 222-232.
24. Skinner, C. H., Shapiro, E. S., Turco, T. L., Cole, C. L., & Brown, D. K. (1992). Comparison of selfand-peer-delivered immediate corrective feedback on multiplication performance. The Journal of School Psychology, 30, 101-116.
25. Sudzina, M. R., & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Personal, professional and contextual circumstances of student teachers who "fail": Setting a course for understanding failure in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 254-262.
26. Van Houten, R. (1980). Learning through feedback. New York, NY: Human Sciences Press, Inc.
27. Wallace, G., & Kauffman, J. (1973). Teaching children with behavior problems. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
28. Warger, C. L., & Aldinger, L. E. (1984). Improving student teacher supervision. The preservice consultation model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 7, 55-163.