Distribution of particles in the Z-axis of tissue sections: Relevance for counting methods

NeuroQuantology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 66-75

  von Bartheld, Christopher S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Cell count; Histology; Lost caps; Morphology; Optical disector; Particle counting; Sampling; Stereology

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; PARAFFIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CELLUOIDIN; COUNTING METHOD; CRYOSECTION; MORPHOLOGY; PARAMETERS; PROCEDURES; STEREOLOGY; TISSUE SECTION; VIBRATOME; Z AXIS;

EID: 84857950158     PISSN: 13035150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abercrombie M. Estimation of nuclear populations from microtome sections. Anat Rec 1946; 94:239-247.
2. Akdogan I. Is frozen sections an advantage for unbiased stereological methods? Neuroanatomy 2004; 3:61.
3. Andersen BB, Gundersen HJ. Pronounced loss of cell nuclei and anisotropic deformation of thick sections. J Microsc 1999; 196:69-73.
4. Baquet ZC, Williams D, Brody J, Smeyne RJ. A comparison of model-based (2D) and design-based (3D) stereological methods for estimating cell number in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) of the C57BL/6J mouse. Neuroscience 2009; 161:1082-1090.
5. Baryshnikova LM, von Bohlen and Halbach O, Kaplan S, von Bartheld CS. Two distinct events, section compression and loss of particles (lost caps), contribute to z-axis distortion and bias in optical disector counting. Microsc Res Tech 2006; 69:738-756.
6. Basgen JM, Nicholas SB, Mauer M, Rozen S, Nyengaard JR. Comparison of methods for counting cells in the mouse glomerulus. Nephron Exp Nephrol 2006; 103:6139-148.
7. Bonthius DJ, McKim R, Koele L, Harb H, Karacay B, Mahoney J, Pantazis NJ. Use of frozen sections to determine neuronal number in the murine hippocampus and neocortex using the optical disector and optical fractionator. Brain Res Protoc 2004; 14:45-57.
8. Carlo CN, Stevens CF. Analysis of differential shrinkage in frozen brain sections and its implications for the use of guard zones in stereology. J Comp Neurol 2011; 519:2803-2810.
9. Clarke PGH, Oppenheim RW. Neuron death in vertebrate development: in vitro methods. Methods Cell Biol 1995; 46:277-321.
10. Clarke PGH. How inaccurate is the Abercrombie correction factor for cell counts? Trends Neurosci 1992;15:211-212.
11. Clarke PGH. An unbiased correction factor for cell counts in histological sections. J Neurosci Methods 1993; 49:133-140.
12. Coggeshall RE. A consideration of neural counting methods. Trends Neurosci 1992; 15:9-13.
13. Coggeshall RE, Chung K. The determination of an empirical correction factor to deal with the problem of nucleolar splitting in neuronal counts. J Neurosci Methods 1984; 10:149-155.
14. Coggeshall RE, Lekan HA. Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: a case for more uniform standards of review. J Comp Neurol 1996; 364:6-15.
15. Coggeshall RE, La Forte R, Klein CM. Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells. J Neurosci Methods 1990; 35:187-194.
16. Cruz-Orive LM. Toward a more objective biology. NeurobiolAging 1994; 15:377-378.
17. Dempster WT. The mechanics of paraffin sectioning by the microtome. Anat Rec 1942; 84:241-267.
18. Dorph-Petersen KA, Nyengaard JR, Gundersen HJ. Tissue shrinkage and unbiased stereological estimation of particle number and size. J Microsc 2001; 204:232-246.
19. Dorph-Petersen KA, Rosenberg R, Nyengaard JR. Estimation of number and volume of immunohistochemically stained neurons in complex brain regions. In: Quantitative Methods in Neuroscience. A Neuroanatomical Approach, (ed. By SM Evans, AM Janson, JR Nyengaard) pp. 231-232. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford. 2004.
20. Evans SM, Nyengaard JR. Section introduction. Quantitative Methods in Neuroscience. A Neuroanatomical Approach, (ed. By SM Evans, AM Janson, JR Nyengaard) pp. 67-84. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford. 2004.
21. Farel PB. Trust, but verify: the necessity of empirical verification in quantitative neurobiology. Anat Rec 2002; 269:157-161.
22. Gardella D, Hatton WJ, Rind HB, Rosen GD, von Bartheld CS. Differential distortion of the z-axis in tissue sections: implications for optical disector counting. J Neurosci Methods 2003; 124:45-59.
23. Geuna S. The revolution of counting tops: two decades of the disector principle in morphological research. Microsc Res Tech 2005; 66:270-274.
24. Guillery RW. On counting and counting errors. J Comp Neurol 2002; 447:1-7.
25. Guillery RW, August BK. Doubt and certainty in counting. Prog Brain Res 2002; 135:25-42.
26. Gundersen HJG. Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc 1986; 143:3-45.
27. Gundersen HJG, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, Evans SM, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Moller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sorensen FB, Vesterby A, West MJ. The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1988a; 96:857-881.
28. Gundersen HJG, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Moller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sorensen FB, Vesterby A, West MJ. Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 1988b; 96:379-394.
29. Hatton WJ, von Bartheld CS. Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of chick embryos: Calibration of the optical disector counting technique reveals systematic bias. J Comp Neurol 1999; 409:169-186.
30. Hedreen JC. Lost caps in histological counting methods. Anat Rec 1998a; 25:366-372.
31. Hedreen JC. What was wrong with the Abercrombie and empirical cell counting methods? A review. Anat Rec 1998b; 250:373-380.
32. Helander KG. Thickness variations within individual paraffin and glycol methacrylate sections. J Microsc 1983; 132:223-227.
33. Howard CV, Reed MG. Unbiased Stereology. Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy. 246 pp. Springer: NewYork. 1998.
34. Konigsmark BW. Methods for the counting of neurons. Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy (ed. By WJH Nauta, SOE Ebbesson). pp. 315-340, Springer: NewYork. 1970.
35. Mayhew TM, Gundersen HJ. 'If you assume, you can make an ass out of u and me': a decade of the disector for stereological counting of particles in 3D space. J Anat 1996; 188:1-15.
36. Mouton PR. Principles and Practices of Unbiased Stereology. An Introduction for Bioscientists. 214 pp. Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore. 2002.
37. Popken GJ, Farel PB. Reliability and validity of the physical disector method for estimating neuron number. J Neurobiol 1996; 31:166-174.
38. Pover CM, Coggeshall RE. Verification of the disector method for counting neurons, with comments on the empirical method. Anat Rec 1991; 231:573-578.
39. Saper CB. Unbiased stereology: three-dimensional measurement in microscopy. Book review. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22:94-95.
40. Schmitz C, Hof PR. Design-based stereology in neuroscience. Neuroscience 2005; 130:813-831.
41. Sterio DC. The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc 1984; 134:127-136.
42. von Bartheld CS. Systematic bias in an 'unbiased' neuronal counting technique. Anat Rec 1999; 257:119-120.
43. von Bartheld CS. Comparison of 2D- and 3D-counting: the need for calibration and common sense. Trends Neurosci 2001; 24:504-506.
44. von Bartheld CS. Counting particles in tissue sections: choices of methods and importance of calibration to minimize biases. Histol Histopathol 2002;17:639-648.
45. Ward TS, Rosen GD, von Bartheld CS. Optical disector counting in cryosections and vibratome sections underestimates particle numbers: effects of tissue quality. Microsc Res Tech 2008; 71:60-68.
46. West MJ. Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22:51-61.
47. Williams RW, Rakic P. Three-dimensional counting: accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. J Comp Neurol 1988; 278:344-352.
48. Williams RW, von Bartheld CS, Rosen GD. Counting cells in sectioned material: A suite of techniques, tools and tips. Curr Protocols Neurosci 2003; (11): 1-29.