Systematic bias in an 'unbiased' neuronal counting technique

Anatomical Record

Volumn 257, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 119-120

  Von Bartheld, Christopher S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; CALIBRATION; CELL COUNT; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CYTOCHEMISTRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; NERVE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOLOGY;

CELL COUNT; NEURONS;

EID: 0032822184     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990815)257:4<119::AID-AR2>3.0.CO;2-8     Document Type: Letter

References (22)

1. Clarke PGH. 1992. How inaccurate is the Abercrombie correction factor for cell counts? Trends Neurosci 15:211-212.
2. Clarke PGH. 1993. An unbiased correction factor for cell counts in histological sections. J Neurosci Methods 49:133-140.
3. Clarke PGH, Oppenheim RW. 1995. Neuron death in vertebrate development: in vitro methods. Methods Cell Biol 46:277-321.
4. Coggeshall RE. 1992. A consideration of neural counting methods. Trends Neurosci 15:9-13.
5. Coggeshall RE, La Forte R, Klein CM. 1990. Calibration of methods for determining numbers of dorsal root ganglion cells. J Neurosci Methods 35:187-194.
6. Coggeshall RE, Lekan HA. 1996. Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: a case for more uniform standards of review. J Comp Neurol 364:6-15.
7. Cruz-Orive LM. 1994. Towards a more objective biology. Neurobiol Aging 15:377-378.
8. Gundersen HJ. 1986. Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc 143:3-45.
9. Gundersen HJG, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, Evans SM, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Møller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sørensen FB, Vesterby A, West MJ. 1988. The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 96:857-881.
10. Hatton WJ, von Bartheld CS. 1999. Analysis of cell death in the trochlear nucleus of chick embryos: calibration of the optical disector counting technique reveals systematic bias. J Comp Neurol 409: 169-186.
11. Hedreen JC. 1998. What was wrong with the Abercrombie and empirical cell counting methods? A review. Anat Rec 250: 373-380.
12. Hedreen JC. 1998. Lost caps in histological counting methods. Anat Rec 250:366-372.
13. Howard CV, Reed MG. 1998. "Unbiased Stereology. Three-Dimensional Measurement in Microscopy" New York: Springer, 246 pp.
14. Nurcombe V, Wreford NG, Bertram JF. 1991. The use of the optical disector to estimate the total number of neurons in the developing chick lateral motor column: effects of purified growth factors. Anat Rec 231:416-424.
15. Popken GJ, Farel PB. 1996. Reliability and validity of the physical disector method for estimating neuron number. J Neurobiol 31:166-174.
16. Pover CM, Coggeshall RE. 1991. Verification of the disector method for counting neurons, with comments on the empirical method. Anat Rec 231:573-578.
17. Saper CB. 1999. Unbiased stereology: three-dimensional measurement in microscopy. Book review. Trends Neurosci 22:94-95.
18. Tramontin AD, Smith GT, Breuner CW, Brenowitz EA. 1998. Seasonal plasticity and sexual dimorphism in the avian song control system: stereological measurement of neuron density and number. J Comp Neurol 396:186-192.
19. West MJ. 1993. New stereological methods for counting neurons. Neurobiol Aging 14:275-285.
20. West MJ. 1999. Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias. Trends Neurosci 22:51-61.
21. West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJG. 1991. Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in the subdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec 231:482-497.
22. Williams RW, Rakic P. 1988. Three-dimensional counting: an accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. J Comp Neurol 278:344-352; Erratum 281:355.