Natural frequencies and Bayesian reasoning: The impact of formal education and problem context

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1039-1055

  Siegrist, Michael ^a   Keller, Carmen ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bayesian problems; frequency format; judgment under uncertainty; numeracy; probabilistic reasoning; risk communication

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN PROBLEM; FREQUENCY FORMAT; JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY; NUMERACY; PROBABILISTIC REASONING; RISK COMMUNICATION;

EXPERIMENTS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84857871542     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.571786     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barbey, A.K., and S.A. Sloman. 2007. Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 241-97.
2. Bramwell, R., H. West, and P. Salmon. 2006. Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: Experimental study. British Medical Journal 333: 284-6. (Pubitemid 44406690)
3. Brase, G.L. 2002. Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15: 381-401. (Pubitemid 37282687)
4. Brase, G.L., L. Fiddick, and C. Harries. 2006. Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59: 965-76. (Pubitemid 43663784)
5. Chapman, G.B., and J. Liu. 2009. Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making 4: 34-40.
6. Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby. 1996. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 58: 1-73. (Pubitemid 126355083)
7. Gigerenzer, G., and A. Edwards. 2003. Simple tools for understanding risks: From innumeracy to insight. British Medical Journal 327, no. 7417: 741-4. (Pubitemid 37176763)
8. Gigerenzer, G., R. Hertwig, E. van den Broek, B. Fasolo, and K.V. Katsikopoulos. 2005. 'A 30% chance of rain tomorrow': How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis 25: 623-9. (Pubitemid 41133005)
9. Gigerenzer, G., and U. Hoffrage. 1995. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review 102: 684-704.
10. Gigerenzer, G., U. Hoffrage, and A. Ebert. 1998. AIDS counselling for low-risk clients. AIDS Care 10: 197-211. (Pubitemid 28185182)
11. Hertwig, R., M.A. Zangerl, E. Biedert, and J. Margraf. 2008. The public's probabilistic numeracy: How tasks, education and exposure to games of chance shape it. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21: 457-70.
12. Hoffrage, U., and G. Gigerenzer. 1998. Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine 73: 538-40. (Pubitemid 28261913)
13. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Keller, C., and M. Siegrist. 2009. Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy. Medical Decision Making 29: 483-90.
15. Keller, C., M. Siegrist, and V.H.M. Visschers. 2009. Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high-and low-numerate individuals. Risk Analysis 29: 1255-64.
16. Macchi, L., and G. Mosconi. 1998. Computational features vs frequentist phrasing in the base-rate fallacy. Swiss Journal of Psychology 57: 79-85.
17. Mellers, B.A., and A.P. McGraw. 1999. How to improve Bayesian reasoning: Comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage (1995). Psychological Review 106: 417-24.
18. Phillips, L.D., and W. Edwards. 1966. Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72: 346-54.
19. Siegrist, M., M.-E. Cousin, and C. Keller. 2008. Risk communication, prenatal screening, and prenatal diagnosis: The illusion of informed decision making. Journal of Risk Research 11: 87-97. (Pubitemid 351547134)
20. Siegrist, M., P. Orlow, and C. Keller. 2008. The effect of graphical and numerical presentation of hypothetical prenatal diagnosis results on risk perception. Medical Decision Making 28: 567-74. (Pubitemid 351989997)
21. Stanovich, K.E., and R.F. West. 1998. Who uses base rates and P(D/̃)? An analysis of individual differences. Memory & Cognition 26: 161-79. (Pubitemid 28113487)
22. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1982. Evidential impact of base rates. In Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, 153-60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Zhu, L., and G. Gigerenzer. 2006. Children can solve Bayesian problems: The role of representation in mental computation. Cognition 98: 287-308. (Pubitemid 43049688)