Clinically missed cancer: How effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection?

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 708-716

  Nishikawa, Robert M ^a   Schmidt, Robert A ^a   Linver, Michael N ^b   Edwards, Alexandra V ^a   Papaioannou, John ^a   Stull, Margaret A ^c   Vyborny, Carl J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b X Ray Associates of New Mexico   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RADIOSENSITIVITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84857831337     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6423     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786 (Pubitemid 32799990)
2. Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, et al. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection. Radiology 2004; 231:208-214 (Pubitemid 38375430)
3. Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005; 236:451-457 (Pubitemid 41023425)
4. Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR 2006; 187:20-28 (Pubitemid 46100140)
5. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR 2006; 187:1483-1491 (Pubitemid 44788678)
6. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer- aided detection - prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006; 239:375-383
7. Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, et al. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR 2007; 189:1135-1141 (Pubitemid 350033006)
8. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005; 237:444-449 (Pubitemid 41507878)
9. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1675-1684
10. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:185-190 (Pubitemid 38263177)
11. Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR 2005; 185:944-950
12. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1399-1409 (Pubitemid 46556325)
13. Gromet M. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. AJR 2008; 190:854-859 (Pubitemid 351571504)
14. Nishikawa RM, Pesce LL. Computer-aided detection evaluation methods are not created equal. Radiology 2009; 251:634-636
15. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR 2003; 181:687-693 (Pubitemid 37021836)
16. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215:554-562 (Pubitemid 30237859)
17. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003; 227:192-200 (Pubitemid 36384199)
18. Chan H-P, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, et al. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 1990; 25:1102-1110 (Pubitemid 20336371)
19. Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994; 191:331-337
20. Nawano S, Murakami K, Moriyama N, Kobatake H, Takeo H, Shimura K. Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography. Invest Radiol 1999; 34:310-316 (Pubitemid 29157707)
21. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:150-154 (Pubitemid 35023735)
22. Moberg K, Bjurstam N, Wilczek B, Rostgard L, Egge E, Muren C. Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2001; 39:104-110 (Pubitemid 32755928)
23. Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, et al. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001; 221:633-640 (Pubitemid 33101753)
24. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Burke P, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. Br J Cancer 2003; 89:1645-1649
25. Marx C, Malich A, Facius M, et al. Are unnecessary follow-up procedures induced by computeraided diagnosis (CAD) in mammography? Comparison of mammographic diagnosis with and without use of CAD. Eur J Radiol 2004; 51:66-72 (Pubitemid 38746899)
26. Taylor P, Champness J, Given-Wilson R, Johnston K, Potts H. Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9:1-58
27. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2006; 241:47-53 (Pubitemid 44433334)
28. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall, 1993
29. Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 2004; 31: 2313-2330 (Pubitemid 39079724)
30. Sumkin JH, Gur D. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography: improving performance or simply shifting the operating point? Radiology 2006; 239:916-917; author reply 917-918
31. Astley S, Gilbert F, Boggis C, et al. CADET: the computer-aided detection evaluation trial In: Pisano ED, ed. Digital mammography, 2004. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing, 2005
32. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 2006; 241:55-66 (Pubitemid 44433335)
33. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Williford ME, Floyd CE. Jr Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 1995; 196:817-822
34. Burnside E, Rubin D, Shachter R. A bayesian network for mammography. Proc AMIA Symp 2000; 106-110
35. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999; 212:817-827 (Pubitemid 29410988)
36. El-Naqa I, Yang YY, Galatsanos NP, Nishikawa RM, Wernick MN. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23:1233-1244
37. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. Radiology 2006; 240:343-356 (Pubitemid 44098630)
38. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis - observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 2002; 224:560-568 (Pubitemid 34809142)
39. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Giger ML, Doi K. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 1999; 6:22-33 (Pubitemid 29061477)
40. Karahaliou A, Skiadopoulos S, Boniatis I, et al. Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. Br J Radiol 2007; 80:648-656 (Pubitemid 47517810)
41. Leichter I, Lederman R, Buchbinder SS, Bamberger P, Novak B, Fields S. Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster? AJR 2004; 182:705-712 (Pubitemid 38269533)
42. Lo JY, Markey MK, Baker JA, Floyd CE. Jr Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. AJR 2002; 178:457-463 (Pubitemid 34098060)
43. Pereira RR Jr, Azevedo Marques PM, Honda MO, et al. Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms. J Digit Imaging 2007; 20:248-255 (Pubitemid 350029114)
44. Sklansky J, Tao EY, Bazargan M, Ornes CJ, Murchison RC, Teklehaimanot S. Computer-aided, case-based diagnosis of mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcifications. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:395-405 (Pubitemid 30341571)
45. Tourassi GD, Harrawood B, Singh S, Lo JY, Floyd CE. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 2007; 34:140-150 (Pubitemid 46035236)
46. Zheng B, Mello-Thoms C, Wang XH, et al. Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library. Acad Radiol 2007; 14:917-927 (Pubitemid 47058995)
47. Gur D, Bandos AI, Fuhrman CR, Klym AH, King JL, Rockette HE. The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: changing the confidence ratings. Acad Radiol 2007; 14:49-53 (Pubitemid 44920377)
48. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1773-1783 (Pubitemid 41549889)
49. The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. AJR 2009; 192:337-340