Computer-aided, case-based diagnosis of mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcifications

Academic Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 395-405

  Sklansky, Jack ^a,b,c   Tao, Eric Y ^c   Bazargan, Mohsen ^a   Ornes, Chester J ^b   Murchison, Robert C ^a   Teklehaimanot, Senait ^a  

^a CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Computer aided diagnosis; Digital mammography; Microcalcifications

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034120628     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80379-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Forrest APM. Screening for breast cancer: the UK scene. Br J Radiol 1989; 62:695-704.
2. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Tenyear risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1089-1096.
3. Powell KA, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA, Barry MM, Ganobcik SN, Cardenosa G. Film-screen versus digitized mammography: assessment of clinical equivalence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:889-894.
4. Ornes C, Sklansky J. A visual multi-expert neural classifier. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Networks, Houston, Texas. June 1997. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1997.
5. Leake DB, ed. Case-based reasoning. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996.
6. Brown J, Bryan S, Warren R. Mammography screening: an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms. BMJ 1996; 312:809-312.
7. Tao E, Ornes C, Sklansky J. Automatic detection of microcalcifications in digital mammography. In: Proceedings of SPIE Symposium on Medical Imaging, February 1998. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE, 1998; 1450-1458.
8. Chen H, Lee GG. A multiresolution wavelet analysis of digital mammograms. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, August 1996. Vol B. Los Alamitos, Calif: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996; 710-714.
9. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Wolverton DE, Metz ML, Schmidt RA, Vyborny CJ, Doi K. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology 1996; 198:671-678.
10. Wu CY, Tsuji O, Freedman MT, Mun SK. Image feature analysis for classification of microcalcifications in digital mammography: neural networks and genetic algorithms. Proc SPIE 1997; 3034:501-509.
11. Penn State College of Medicine. Available at: http:/www.wiau.man.ac.uk /services/MIAS/MIAScom.html. Accessed: June 1995.
12. Dance DR. Design of a common database for research in mammogram image analysis. Proc SPIE 1993; 1905:538-539.
13. Suckling J, et al. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database. Available at: http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/ Mammography/Database.html. Accessed: June 1995.
14. Karssemeijer N. Common database for research in mammographic image analysis. Proc SPIE 1993; 1905:542-543.
15. Bowyer K, University of South Florida. Mammography images analysis research database. Available at: http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/∼leeper /mammo_intro.html. Accessed: March 1996.
16. Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
17. Swett HA, Giger M, Doi K. Computer vision and decision support. In: Hendee WR, Wells PNT, eds. Perception of visual information. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1993; 272-315.
18. Gudivada N, Raghaven VV. Content-based image retrieval systems. Computer 1995; 28:18-22.
19. Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Swets JA. Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:240-252.
20. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie B, et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999; 212:817-827.
21. Ornes C, Disher AC, Sklansky J. A visual neural network that learns perceptual relationships. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Los Alamitos, Calif: IEEE Computer Society, 1998; 873-875.
22. Lanyi M. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast calcifications. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
23. Siedlecki W, Sklansky J. A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection. Pattern Recognition Lett 1989; 10:335-347.
24. Ornes C, Sklansky J. A visual neural classifier. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybernet 1998; 28B:620-625.
25. Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.
26. BI-RADS Committee. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
27. Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1982.
28. Roe CA, Metz CE. The Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality ROC data: validation by computer simulation. Acad Radiol 1997: 4:298-303.
29. Elston WC, Johnson WD. Essentials of biostatistics. Philadelphia, Pa: Davis, 1987.
30. Armitage P. Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1971.
31. Schmidt RA, Newstead GM, Linver MN, et al. Mammographic sreening sensitivity of general radiologists. In: Karssemeijer N, ed. Digital mammography, Nijmegen 1998. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 1998; 383-388.
32. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-235.