Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms

Radiology

Volumn 227, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 192-200

  Karssemeijer, Nico ^a   Otten, Johannes D M ^a   Verbeek, Andre L M ^a   Groenewoud, Johanna H ^b   De Koning, Harry J ^b   Hendriks, Jan H C L ^a   Holland, Roland ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Cancer screening; Computers, diagnostic aid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0037380362     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2271011962     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. Cancer 1993; 72:1933-1938.
2. Harvey JE, Fajardo LL, Inis CA. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1167-1172.
3. Jones R, McLean L, Young J. Proportion of cancers detected at first incident screen which were false negative at the prevalent screen. Breast 1996; 5:339-343.
4. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Moss SM. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. J Med Screen 1998; 5:195-201.
5. Vitak B. Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergotland mammographic screening programme: radiological analysis. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:639-646.
6. Burhenne LJW, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. The potential contribution of computer aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215: 554-562.
7. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N. Automated detection of breast carcinomas that were not detected in a screening program. Radiology 1998; 207:465-471.
8. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219:192-202.
9. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786.
10. Kundel H, Nodine C, Carmody D. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1978; 13:175-181.
11. Nodine CF, Mello-Thoms C, Weinstein SP, et al. Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis. Radiology 2001; 221: 122-129.
12. Jiang YL, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Giger ML, Doi K. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 1999; 6:22-33.
13. Veldkamp WJH, Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Hendriks JH. Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. Med Phys 2000; 27:2600-2608.
14. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999; 212:817-827.
15. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Elmore JG, Seger D, White D, Brenner RJ. Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1257-1262.
16. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Doi K. Relative gains in diagnostic accuracy between computer-aided diagnosis and independent double reading. SPIE Med Imaging 2000; 3981:10-15.
17. Swensson RG. Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images. Med Phys 1996; 23:1709-1725.
18. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AAS. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241-244.
19. Anderson ED, Muir BB, Walsh JS, Kirkpatrick AE. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. Clin Radiol 1994; 49:248-251.
20. Brown J, Bryan S, Warren R. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms. BMJ 1996; 312: 809-812.
21. Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Beemsterboer PM, et al. Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme. Br J Cancer 1999; 81(5):912-917.