Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 337-340

  The, Juliette S ^a,b   Schilling, Kathy J ^a   Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W ^c   Friedmann, Euvondia ^a   McGinnis, Ryan ^a   Holcomb, Richard G ^a  

^a Boca Raton Community Hospital   (United States)

^b Boca Radiology Group   (United States)

^c iCAD Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided detection; Computer aided diagnosis; Digital images; Full field digital mammography; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DENSITY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 59349110651     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3884     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 1992; 183:629-630
2. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiology 2005; 234:353-362
3. Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 2007; 244:104-111
4. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Yaffe MJ, et al. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology 2005; 236:404-412
5. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1773-1783
6. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215:554-562 [Erratum in Radiology 2000; 216:306]
7. Leichter I, Buchbinder S, Bamberger P, Novak B, Fields S, Lederman R. Quantitative characterization of mass lesions on digitized mammograms for computer-assisted diagnosis. Invest Radiol 2000; 35:366-372
8. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR 2003; 181:687-693
9. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219:192-202
10. Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR 2007; 188:377-384
11. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR 2005; 184:439-444 [Erratum in AJR 2005; 184:1968]
12. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, Desimio MP. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 2005; 104:931-935
13. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003; 228:851-856
14. Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O'Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2002; 225:182-189
15. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786