Navigation in minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has no advantage in comparison to a conventional minimally invasive implantation

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 281-288

  Weber, Patrick ^a   Utzschneider, Sandra ^a   Sadoghi, Patrick ^a,b   Pietschmann, Matthias F ^a   Ficklscherer, Andreas ^a   Jansson, Volkmar ^a   Müller, Peter E ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Knee society score; Navigation; Outcome; Prosthesis positioning; UKA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84857637524     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1404-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. MJ Mack 2001 Minimally invasive and robotic surgery JAMA 285 568 572 11176860 10.1001/jama.285.5.568 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7kvFKisw%3D%3D
2. H Pandit C Jenkins K Barker CA Dodd DW Murray 2006 The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 54 60 16365121 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.17114 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mnnslejuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43125314)
3. Repicci JA, Eberle RW (1999) Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 8:20-27
4. PE Müller C Pellengahr M Witt J Kircher HJ Refior V Jansson 2004 Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 19 296 301 15067640 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.013 (Pubitemid 38519820)
5. AJ Price J Webb H Topf CA Dodd JW Goodfellow DW Murray 2001 Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision J Arthroplasty 16 970 976 11740750 10.1054/arth.2001.25552 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnptFygug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 33151871)
6. Heyse TJ, Efe T, Rumpf S, Schofer MD, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J, Hauk C (2011) Minimally invasive versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (Epub ahead of print)
7. DA Fisher M Watts KE Davis 2003 Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 18 2 8 14560403 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00291-2 (Pubitemid 37259658)
8. JY Jenny C Boeri 2003 Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11 40 45 12548450 (Pubitemid 40824261)
9. F Voss MB Sheinkop JO Galante RM Barden AG Rosenberg 1995 Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations J Arthroplasty 10 764 771 8749758 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80072-5 1:STN:280:DyaK28zls1Crsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 126733977)
10. P Cartier JL Sanouiller RP Grelsamer 1996 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period J Arthroplasty 11 782 788 8934317 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80177-X 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FovVekuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26393856)
11. P Hernigou G Deschamps 2004 Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A 506 511 14996875 (Pubitemid 38269020)
12. R Decking Y Markmann J Fuchs W Puhl HP Scharf 2005 Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation J Arthroplasty 20 282 288 15809943 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.047 (Pubitemid 40460792)
13. JY Jenny U Clemens S Kohler H Kiefer W Konermann RK Miehlke 2005 Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses J Arthroplasty 20 2005 832 839 16230232 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.002 (Pubitemid 41463681)
14. B Stockl M Nogler R Rosiek M Fischer M Krismer O Kessler 2004 Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 180 186 15346071 10.1097/01.blo.0000136835.40566.d9 (Pubitemid 39167127)
15. RG Haaker M Wojciechowski P Patzer RE Willburger M Senkal M Engelhardt 2006 Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation Orthopade 35 1073 1079 16969643 10.1007/s00132-006-1006-y 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28jltl2isg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44579713)
16. KA Jung SJ Kim SC Lee SH Hwang NK Ahn 2010 Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique Knee 17 387 391 19945880 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.003
17. MH Lim A Tallay J Bartlett 2009 Comparative study of the use of computer assisted navigation system for axial correction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17 341 346 18974969 10.1007/s00167-008-0655-2
18. JH Lonner TK John MA Conditt 2010 Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study Clin Orthop Relat Res 468 141 146 19593669 10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5
19. L Perlick H Bathis M Tingart C Perlick C Luring J Grifka 2004 Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system Int Orthop 28 193 197 15007563 10.1007/s00264-004-0549-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvgsVKltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39150311)
20. RE Rosenberger C Fink S Quirbach R Attal K Tecklenburg C Hoser 2008 The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16 1133 1140 18810391 10.1007/s00167-008-0618-7
21. JK Seon EK Song SJ Park TR Yoon KB Lee ST Jung 2009 Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system J Arthroplasty 24 351 357 18534460 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.025
22. JY Jenny PE Müller R Weyer M John P Weber E Ciobanu A Schmitz T Bacher W Neumann V Jansson 2006 Navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Orthopedics 29 S117 S121 17407935
23. JC Goslings DJ Gouma 2008 What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32 952 18401640 10.1007/s00268-008-9563-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czit1agtw%3D%3D
24. WD Dupont WD Plummer 1998 Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression Control Clin Trials 19 589 601 9875838 10.1016/S0197-2456(98)00037-3 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FptFSnsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29057724)
25. AJ Cossey AJ Spriggins 2005 The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 20 29 34 15660057 10.1016/j.arth.2004.10.012 (Pubitemid 40127101)
26. PR Aldinger HS Gill U Schlegel M Schneider M Clauss JW Goodfellow DW Murray SJ Breusch 2004 Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study Orthopade 34 1094 1102 10.1007/s00132-005-0883-9 (Pubitemid 41624263)
27. O Robertsson K Knutson S Lewold L Lidgren 2001 The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 45 49 11245537 10.1302/0301-620X.83B1.10871 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7osVeitg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32170960)
28. A Gulati H Pandit C Jenkins R Chau CA Dodd DW Murray 2009 The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 469 474 19336806 10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.22105 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M3kvFChuw%3D%3D
29. WR Kennedy RP White 1987 Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results Clin Orthop Relat Res 221 278 285 3608312 (Pubitemid 17131607)
30. P Hernigou G Deschamps 2004 Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 423 161 165 15232443 10.1097/01.blo.0000128285.90459.12 (Pubitemid 38787732)
31. Utzschneider S, Goettinger M, Weber P, Horng A, Glaser C, Jansson V, Müller PE (2011) Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (Epub ahead of print)
32. J Benjamin 2006 Component alignment in total knee arthroplasty Instr Course Lect 55 405 412 16958475
33. Weber P, Schröder C, Utzschneider S, Jansson V, Müller PE (2011) A high tibial slope reduces wear in unicondylar knee arthroplasty [German]. In: Proceedings of the symposium for experimental orthopedics at the orthopedic clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich. Unfallchirurg 114, p S13
34. C Diezi S Wirth DC Meyer PP Koch 2010 Effect of femoral to tibial varus mismatch on the contact area of unicondylar knee prostheses Knee 17 350 355 19914073 10.1016/j.knee.2009.10.004
35. M Clarius C Hauck JB Seeger M Pritsch C Merle PR Aldinger 2010 Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA Int Orthop 34 1145 1151 19813012 10.1007/s00264-009-0881-3
36. SM Hauptmann P Weber C Glaser C Birkenmaier V Jansson PE Muller 2008 Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16 770 775 18516590 10.1007/s00167-008-0563-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvps1agsg%3D%3D
37. JK Seon EK Song TR Yoon HY Seo SG Cho 2007 Tibial plateau stress fracture after unicondylar knee arthroplasty using a navigation system: two case reports Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15 67 70 16770632 10.1007/s00167-006-0097-7
38. MH Song BH Kim SJ Ahn SH Yoo MS Lee 2009 Early complications after minimally invasive mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 24 1281 1284 19729271 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.012
39. S Lewold S Goodman K Knutson O Robertsson L Lidgren 1995 Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis: a Swedish multicenter survival study J Arthroplasty 10 722 731 8749752 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80066-X 1:STN:280:DyaK28zls1Cktg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 126733974)
40. WG Hamilton MB Collier E Tarabee JP McAuley CA Engh Jr GA Engh 2006 Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 21 98 107 16950070 10.1016/j.arth.2006.05.010 (Pubitemid 44293256)
41. O Cerha S Kirschner KP Gunther J Lutzner 2009 Cost analysis for navigation in knee endoprosthetics Orthopade 38 1235 1240 19690831 10.1007/s00132-009-1473-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mfhs1ertA%3D%3D