Implant position in knee surgery: A comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 7 SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 2-8

  Fisher, David A ^a,b   Watts, Melanie ^a,b   Davis, Kenneth E ^c  

^a METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b ORTHOINDY   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HIP AND KNEE SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Implant; Knee; Minimally invasive; Unicompartmental

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 0141958926     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00291-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Rand J, Morrey BF: Correlation of knee alignment with loosening, p. 3. In Dorr LD (ed): Proceedings of the knee society. University Park Press, Baltimore, 1984
2. Ewald FC, Jacobs MA, Walker PS, et al: Accuracy of total knee replacement component position and relation to bone cement interface reaction. AAOS Instructional Course Lectures 53:531, 1984
3. Lotke P, Ecker M: Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:77, 1977
4. Rand J, Coventry M: Ten-year evolution of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232:168, 1988
5. Marmor L: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: ten-to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 226:14, 1988
6. Christensen NO: Unicompartmental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A nine-year series of 575 knees from a Swedish hospital. Clin Orthop 273:165, 1991
7. Insall JN, Aglietti P: A five-to-seven year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62: 1329, 1980
8. Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, et al: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: eight-to-12-year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop 271:96, 1991
9. Palmer SH, Morrison PJM, Ross AC: Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 350:143, 1998
10. Engh G, Dwyer K, Hanes C: Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:9, 1992
11. Barrett W, Scott R: Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1328, 1987
12. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA: Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15:17, 2002
13. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al: Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:971, 2001
14. Kozinn SC, Scott RD: Current concepts review: unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:145, 1989
15. Kennedy W, White R: Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop 221:278, 1987
16. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: ten-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11:782, 1996
17. Thornhill TS, Scott RD: Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 20:245, 1989
18. Swienckowski J, Page BJ II: Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Use of the L-cut and comparison with the tibial inset method. Clin Orthop 239:161, 1989