Is computernavigation a usefull tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study;Ist die navigation bei der schlittenprothese sinnvoll? Eine pilotstudie am leichenknie

Orthopade

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1094-1102

  Aldinger, P R ^a   Gill, H S ^b   Schlegel, U ^a   Schneider, M ^a   Clauss, M ^a   Goodfellow, J W ^b   Murray, D W ^b,c   Breusch, S J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer navigation; Effectiveness; Implant positioning; Knee replacement; Minimally invasive approach

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMUR; HAND; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PILOT STUDY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGEON; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; PILOT PROJECTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27744560917     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0883-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chatain F, Richard A et al. (2004) Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90(1): 49-57
2. DiGioia AM 3rd, Blendea S et al. (2004) Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2): 183-189
3. Ecker ML, Lotke PA et al. (1987) Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res(216): 151-158
4. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(1): 40-45
5. Lewold S, Robertsson O et al. (1998) Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 69(5): 469-474
6. Meek RM, Masri BA et al. (2004) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am 35(2): 191-200
7. Mielke RK, Clemens U et al. (2001) [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation - preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139(2): 109-116
8. Miller RK, Goodfellow JW et al. (1998) In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(5): 900-906
9. Mont MA, Stuchin SA et al. (2004) Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies. Instr Course Lect 53: 265-283
10. Muller PE, Pellengahr C et al. (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(3): 296-301
11. Murray DW (2000) Unicompartmental knee replacement: now or never? Orthopedics 23(9): 979-980
12. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW et al. (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6): 983-989
13. Oswald MH, Jakob RP et al. (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(4): 419-426
14. Perlick L, Bathis H et al. (2004) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop 28(4): 193-197
15. Price AJ, Rees JL et al. (2004) Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: A comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty 19(5): 590-597
16. Price AJ, Webb J et al. (2001) Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16(8): 970-976
17. Rees JL, Price AJ et al. (2001) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(7): 1034-1036
18. Robertsson O, Knutson K et al. (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(1): 45-49
19. Sparmann M, Wolke B (2003) [Value of navigation and robot-guided surgery in total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopäde 32(6): 498-505
20. Sparmann M, Wolke B et al. (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6): 830-835
21. Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2): 191-194
22. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO et al. (1994) Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop(299): 31-43
23. Weale AE, Murray DW et al. (1999) The length of the patellar tendon after unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(5): 790-795