Navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 29, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2006, Pages

  Jenny, Jean Yves ^a   Müller, Peter E ^b   Weyer, R ^c   John, Michael ^d   Weber, Patrick ^b   Ciobanu, Eugène ^a   Schmitz, Andreas ^c   Bacher, Thomas ^c   Neumann, Wolfram ^d   Jansson, Volkmar ^b  

^a CRAM de Strasbourg   (France)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Krankenhaus fur Sportverletzte Hellersen   (Germany)

^d OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ARTHROSCOPY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33750593635     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cartier P, Sanouillier JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11:782-788.
2. Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Prothèses unicompartimentales du genou. Rev Chir Orthop. 1996; 82(suppl)1:23.
3. Lootvoet L, Burton P, Himmer O, et al. Prothèses unicompartimentales de genou: influence du positionnement du plateau tibial sur les résultats fonctionnels. Acta Orthop Belg. 1997; 63:94-101.
4. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:373-379.
5. Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84:2235-2239.
6. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Accuracy of implantation of a unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations: a case-controlled comparative study. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:1016-1020.
7. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, et al. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:282-288.
8. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 426:180-186.
9. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428:131-139.
10. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, et al. Mise en place des prothèses totales du genou assistée par ordinateur : comparaison avec la technique conventionelle. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001; 87:18-28.
11. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:970-976.
12. Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, et al. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:296-301.
13. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a nonimage-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11:40-45.
14. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6:217-220.
15. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1968; 277(suppl):7-72.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Implantation d'une prothèse totale de genou assistée par ordinateur. Etude comparative cas-témoin avec une instrumentation traditionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001; 87:645-652.
17. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, et al. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 354:49-56.
18. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, MacGraw RW. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17:698-705.
19. Schai PA, Suh JT, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2- to 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:365-372.
20. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:862-865.
21. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knuston K, et al. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70:170-175.
22. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71:262-267.
23. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 367:61-72.
24. Bert JM. 10-year survivorship of metal-backed, unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13:901-905.
25. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 367:50-60.
26. Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, et al. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 295:205-213.
27. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:983-989.
28. Svard UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:191-194.