Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A comparison with a conventional instrumented technique

Knee

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 387-391

  Jung, Kwang Am ^a   Kim, Sung Jae ^b   Lee, Su Chan ^a   Hwang, Seung Hyun ^a   Ahn, Nong Kyoum ^a  

^a Himchan Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Knee; Navigation; Oxford; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 78650075329     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Foran J.R., Mont M.A., Etienne G., Jones L.C., Hungerford D.S. The outcome of total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2004, 86:1609-1615.
2. Harrysson O.L., Robertsson O., Nayfeh J.F. Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 421:162-168.
3. Keene G., Simpson D., Kalairajah Y. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 2006, 88:44-48.
4. Moreland J.R. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 226:49-64.
5. Buckup K., Linke L.C., Hahne V. Minimally invasive implantation and computer navigation for a unicondylar knee system. Orthopedics 2007, 30:66-69.
6. Rosenberger R.E., Fink C., Quirbach S., Attal R., Tecklenburg K., Hoser C. The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16:1133-1140.
7. Jenny J.Y., Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003, 11:40-45.
8. Voss F., Sheinkop M.B., Galante J.O., Barden R.M., Rosenberg A.G. Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations. J Arthroplast 1995, 10(6):764-771.
9. Fisher D.A., Watts M., Davis K.E. Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2003, 18(7 Suppl 1):2-8.
10. Murray D.W., Goodfellow J.W., O'Connor J.J. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 1998, 80:983-989.
11. Skowroński J., Jatskewych J., Długosz J., Skowroński R., Bielecki M. The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 10-year follow-up study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2005, 7(6):620-625.
12. Gulati A., Chau R., Simpson D.J., Dodd C.A.F., Gill H.S., Murray D.W. Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2009, 16:196-199.
13. Mayman D.J., Rudan J., Watson D., Ellis R. Computer-enhanced insertion of the Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty: a fluoroguide technique. Comput Aided Surg 2004, 9:81-85.
14. Kort N.P., van Raay J.J., Thomassen B.J. Alignment of the femoral component in a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study in 10 cadaver femora. Knee 2007, 14:280-283.
15. Argenson J.N., Chevrol-Benkeddache Y., Aubaniac J.M. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2002, 84:2235-2239.
16. Hernigou P., Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 423:161-165.
17. Emerson R.H., Higgins L.L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2008, 90:118-122.
18. Emerson R.H., Hansborough T., Reitman R.D., Rosenfeldt W., Higgins L.L. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 404:62-70.
19. Emerson R.H., Head W.C., Peters P.C. Soft-tissue balance and alignment in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 1992, 74:807-810.
20. Emerson R.H. Preoperative and postoperative limb alignment after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007, 30:32-34.