The polymorphic prelude to Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 209-218

  Cutter, Asher D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GENETIC DRIFT; HYBRID; INCOMPATIBILITY; LITERATURE REVIEW; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; PLANT; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PLANTS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 84857535040     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.004     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Bateson W. Heredity and variation in modern lights. Darwin and Modern Science 1909, 85-101. Cambridge University Press. A.C. Seward (Ed.).
2. Dobzhansky T. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 1936, 21:113-135.
3. Muller H.J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 1942, 6:71-125.
4. Orr H.A. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 1995, 139:1805-1813.
5. Orr H.A. Dobzhansky, Bateson, and the genetics of speciation. Genetics 1996, 144:1331-1335.
6. Wu C.I., Ting C.T. Genes and speciation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5:114-122.
7. Nosil P., Schluter D. The genes underlying the process of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:160-167.
8. Scopece G., et al. Polymorphism of postmating reproductive isolation within plant species. Taxon 2010, 59:1367-1374.
9. Rieseberg L.H., Blackman B.K. Speciation genes in plants. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106:439-455.
10. Sweigart A.L., et al. Natural variation for a hybrid incompatibility between two species of Mimulus. Evolution 2007, 61:141-151.
11. Case A.L., Willis J.H. Hybrid male sterility in Mimulus (Phrymaceae) is associated with a geographically restricted mitochondrial rearrangement. Evolution 2008, 62:1026-1039.
12. Barr C.M., Fishman L. The nuclear component of a cytonuclear hybrid incompatibility in Mimulus maps to a cluster of pentatricopeptide repeat genes. Genetics 2010, 184:455-465.
13. Hollingshead L. A lethal factor in Crepis effective only in an interspecific hybrid. Genetics 1930, 15:114-140.
14. Good J.M., et al. Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 2008, 62:50-65.
15. Kopp A., Frank A.K. Speciation in progress? A continuum of reproductive isolation in Drosophila bipectinata. Genetica 2005, 125:55-68.
16. Coyne J.A., et al. Is Wright's shifting balance process important in evolution?. Evolution 2000, 54:306-317.
17. Bordenstein S.R., et al. Intraspecific variation in sexual isolation in the jewel wasp Nasonia. Evolution 2000, 54:567-573.
18. Reed L.K., Markow T.A. Early events in speciation: polymorphism for hybrid male sterility in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:9009-9012.
19. Orr H.A., Irving S. Segregation distortion in hybrids between the Bogota and USA subspecies of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 2005, 169:671-682.
20. Hutter P., Ashburner M. Genetic rescue of inviable hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species. Nature 1987, 327:331-333.
21. Watanabe T.K. A gene that rescues the lethal hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Jpn. J. Genet. 1979, 54:325-331.
22. Sawamura K., et al. Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster. Genetics 1993, 133:307-313.
23. Ting C.T., et al. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 1998, 282:1501-1504.
24. Mihola O., et al. A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 2009, 323:373-375.
25. Dilkes B.P., et al. The maternally expressed WRKY transcription factor TTG2 controls lethality in interploidy crosses of Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:2707-2720.
26. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer.
27. Shuker D.M., et al. Patterns of male sterility in a grasshopper hybrid zone imply accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities without selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 2005, 272:2491-2497.
28. Perez-Salas S., Ehrman L. Mechanisms of male sterility in hybrids of the Drosophila paulistorum group. Genetics 1971, 69:63-70.
29. Ehrman L., Kernagha R.P. Microorganismal basis of infectious hybrid male sterility in Drosophila paulistorum. J. Hered. 1971, 62:67-71.
30. Lopez-Fernandez H., Bolnick D.I. What causes partial F1 hybrid viability? Incomplete penetrance versus genetic variation. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1294.
31. Presgraves D.C. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:175-180.
32. Whitlock M.C. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 2003, 164:767-779.
33. Schluter D., Conte G.L. Genetics and ecological speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106(Suppl. 1):9955-9962.
34. Schluter D. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 2009, 323:737-741.
35. Pritchard J.K., et al. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R208-R215.
36. Nei M., et al. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 1983, 103:557-579.
37. Wade M.J., et al. Temperature effects and genotype-by-environment interactions in hybrids: Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Evolution 1999, 53:855-865.
38. Gavrilets S. Hybrid zones with Dobzhansky-type epistatic selection. Evolution 1997, 51:1027-1035.
39. Barton N.H., Hewitt G.M. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16:113-148.
40. Teeter K.C., et al. The variable genomic architecture of isolation between hybridizing species of house mice. Evolution 2010, 64:472-485.
41. Nolte A.W., et al. Variable patterns of introgression in two sculpin hybrid zones suggest that genomic isolation differs among populations. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:2615-2627.
42. Payseur B.A. Using differential introgression in hybrid zones to identify genomic regions involved in speciation. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 10:806-820.
43. Buerkle C.A., Rieseberg L.H. Low intraspecific variation for genomic isolation between hybridizing sunflower species. Evolution 2001, 55:684-691.
44. Buerkle C.A., Lexer C. Admixture as the basis for genetic mapping. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:686-694.
45. Martin N.H., Willis J.H. Geographical variation in postzygotic isolation and its genetic basis within and between two Mimulus species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365:2469-2478.
46. Whitlock M.C. Evolutionary inference from Qst. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:1885-1896.
47. Phillips P.C., Johnson N.A. The population genetics of synthetic lethals. Genetics 1998, 150:449-458.
48. Demuth J.P., Wade M.J. On the theoretical and empirical framework for studying genetic interactions within and among species. Am. Nat. 2005, 165:524-536.
49. Lynch M. The divergence of neutral quantitative characters among partially isolated populations. Evolution 1988, 42:455-466.
50. Turelli M., Moyle L.C. Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule. Genetics 2007, 176:1059-1088.
51. Orr H.A., Turelli M. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 2001, 55:1085-1094.
52. Chakraborty R., Nei M. Genetic differentiation of quantitative characters between populations or species. I. Mutation and random genetic drift. Genet. Res. 1982, 39:303-314.
53. Orr H.A. The genetics of species differences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:343-350.
54. Reed L.K., et al. Genetic architecture of hybrid male sterility in Drosophila: analysis of intraspecies variation for interspecies isolation. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3076.
55. Moyle L.C., Payseur B.A. Reproductive isolation grows on trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:591-598.
56. Yu J., et al. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 2008, 178:539-551.
57. Churchill G.A., et al. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:1133-1137.
58. Presgraves D.C. A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 2003, 163:955-972.
59. Masly J.P., Presgraves D.C. High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e243.
60. Wade M.J., et al. Analysis of autosomal polygenic variation for the expression of Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Genetics 1994, 138:791-799.
61. Butlin R. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1987, 2:8-13.
62. Caisse M., Antonovics J. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. Heredity 1978, 40:371-384.
63. Lynch M., Force A.G. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:590-605.
64. Merila J., Crnokrak P. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 2001, 14:892-903.
65. McKay J.K., Latta R.G. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:285-291.
66. Leinonen T., et al. Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:1-17.
67. Whitlock M.C. Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation. Genet. Res. 1999, 74:215-221.
68. ST estimates: problems and some solutions. Genetics 2005, 171:1331-1339.
69. ST is misleading. Or is it?. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:1805-1812.
70. Matute D.R., et al. A test of the snowball theory for the rate of evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Science 2010, 329:1518-1521.
71. Moyle L.C., Nakazato T. Hybrid incompatibility 'snowballs' between Solanum species. Science 2010, 329:1521-1523.
72. Gillespie J.H., Langley C.H. Are evolutionary rates really variable?. J. Mol. Evol. 1979, 13:27-34.
73. Li W.H. Distribution of nucleotide differences between two randomly chosen cistrons in a finite population. Genetics 1977, 85:331-337.
74. Nei M., Li W.H. Mathematical-model for studying genetic-variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76:5269-5273.
75. Stadler T., et al. Testing for 'snowballing' hybrid incompatibilities in Solanum: impact of ancestral polymorphism and divergence estimates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:31-34.
76. Johnson N.A. The evolution of reproductive isolating barriers. Evolutionary Genetics, Concepts and Case Studies 2006, 374-386. Oxford University Press. C.W. Fox, J.B. Wolf (Eds.).
77. Mendelson T.C., et al. Quantifying patterns in the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 2004, 58:1424-1433.
78. Gourbiere S., Mallet J. Are species real? The shape of the species boundary with exponential failure, reinforcement, and the 'missing snowball'. Evolution 2010, 64:1-24.
79. Bolnick D.I., Near T.J. Tempo of hybrid inviability in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Evolution 2005, 59:1754-1767.
80. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. 'Patterns of speciation in Drosophila' revisited. Evolution 1997, 51:295-303.
81. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 1989, 43:362-381.
82. Bikard D., et al. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 2009, 323:623-626.
83. Bomblies K., et al. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e236.
84. Leppälä J., Savolainen O. Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions reduce male fertility in hybrids of Arabidopsis lyrata subspecies. Evolution 2011, 65:2959-2972.
85. Grundt H.H., et al. High biological species diversity in the arctic flora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:972-975.
86. Rieseberg L.H. Crossing relationships among ancient and experimental sunflower hybrid lineages. Evolution 2000, 54:859-865.
87. Christie P., MacNair M.R. The distribution of postmating reproductive isolating genes in populations of the yellow monkey flower, Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 1987, 41:571-578.
88. Christie P., MacNair M.R. Complementary lethal factors in two North American populations of the yellow monkey flower. J. Hered. 1984, 75:510-511.
89. Yamamoto E., et al. Gain of deleterious function causes an autoimmune response and Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibility in rice. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 2010, 283:305-315.
90. Jiang W.Z., et al. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of hwh1 and hwh2, a set of complementary genes controlling hybrid breakdown in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116:1117-1127.
91. Kozlowska, J.L. et al. (2012) Genetic variation for post-zygotic reproductive isolation between Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis sp. 9. Evolution, , in press. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01514.x.
92. Lachance J., True J.R. X-autosome incompatibilities in Drosophila melanogaster: tests of Haldane's rule and geographic patterns within species. Evolution 2010, 64:3035-3046.
93. Willett C.S., Burton R.S. Viability of cytochrome c genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 2001, 55:1592-1599.
94. Burton R.S. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 1987, 41:504-513.
95. Wade M.J., Johnson N.A. Reproductive isolation between two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani: variation within and among geographical populations of T. castaneum. Heredity 1994, 72:155-162.
96. Wade M.J., et al. Genetic variation segregating in natural populations of Tribolium castaneum affecting traits observed in hybrids with T. freemani. Genetics 1997, 147:1235-1247.
97. Drury D.W., et al. An unusual barrier to gene flow: perpetually immature larvae from inter-population crosses in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:2678-2686.
98. Demuth J.P., Wade M.J. Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. II. Haldane's rule and incipient speciation. Evolution 2007, 61:694-699.
99. Demuth J.P., Wade M.J. Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. I. Genetic architecture. Evolution 2007, 61:494-509.
100. Vyskocilova M., et al. Polymorphism in hybrid male sterility in wild-derived Mus musculus musculus strains on proximal chromosome 17. Mamm. Genome 2009, 20:83-91.