Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. II. Haldane's rule and incipient speciation

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 694-699

  Demuth, Jeffery P ^a   Wade, Michael J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance; Epistasis; Genotype by environment interaction; Hybrid breakdown; Joint scaling; X autosome interaction

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEETLE; DOMINANCE; EPISTASIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; INTROGRESSION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COLOMBIA; CROSS BREEDING; ECUADOR; FEMALE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TEMPERATURE; TRIBOLIUM;

ANIMALS; COLOMBIA; CROSSES, GENETIC; ECUADOR; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; INBREEDING; MALE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX RATIO; TEMPERATURE; TRIBOLIUM;

ASIA; COLOMBIA; ECUADOR; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN; SOUTH AMERICA;

COLEOPTERA; DROSOPHILIDAE; TRIBOLIUM (BEETLE); TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM;

EID: 34247533832     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00049.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bordenstein, S. R., and M. D. Drapeau. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:490-501.
2. Butlin, R. K., and T. Tregenza. 1997. Evolutionary biology-is speciation no accident? Nature 387:551-552.
3. Charlesworth, B., J. A. Coyne, and N. H. Barton. 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130:113-146.
4. Coyne, J. A. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355:511-515.
5. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
6. -. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
7. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinaur Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
8. Demuth, J. P., and M. J. Wade. 2005. On the theoretical and empirical framework for studying genetic interactions within and among species. Am. Nat. 165: 514-531.
9. Frank, S. A. 1991. Haldane rule-a defense of the meiotic drive theory. Evolution 45:1714-1717.
10. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant. 1997. Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 94:7768-7775.
11. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
12. Laurie, C. C. 1997. The weaker sex is heterogametic: 75 years of Haldane's rule. Genetics 147:937-951.
13. Mallet, J., W. O. McMillan, and C. D. Jiggins. 1998. Estimating the mating behavior of a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species in the wild. Evolution 52:503-510.
14. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
15. -. 1970. Populations, species, and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Muller, H. J. 1940. Bearings of the 'Drosophila' work on systematics. Pp. 185-268 in J. Huxley, ed. The new systematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
17. -. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
18. Naveira, H. F. 2003. On the relative roles of faster-X evolution and dominance in the establishment of intrinsic postzygotic isolating barriers. Genetica 118:41-50.
19. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 270:1911-1918.
20. Orr, H. A. 1993. A mathematical-model of Haldane's rule. Evolution 47:1606-1611.
21. Orr, H. A., and S. Irving. 2001. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 158:1089-1100.
22. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., and M. A. F. Noor. 2005. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science 310:1467-.
23. Palopoli, M. F., and C. I. Wu. 1994. Genetics of hybrid male-sterility between Drosophila sibling species- a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics 138:329-341.
24. Pomiankowski, A., and L. D. Hurst. 1993. Genomic conflicts underlying Haldane rule. Genetics 133:425-432.
25. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
26. -. 2003. A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid Incompatibilities in Drosophila. Genetics 163:955-972.
27. Price, T. D., and M. M. Bouvier. 2002. The evolution of F-1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083-2089.
28. Rundle, H. D., and D. Schluter. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: Sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52:200-208.
29. Saetre, G. P., T. Moum, S. Bures, M. Kral, M. Adamjan, and J. Moreno. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-592.
30. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
31. Tao, Y., and D. L. Hartl. 2003. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D-mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57:2580-2598.
32. Tao, Y., S. N. Xhen, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie. 2003a. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D-mauritiana. I. Differential accumulation of hybrid male sterility effects on the X and autosomes. Genetics 164:1383-1397.
33. Tao, Y., Z. B. Zeng, J. Li, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie. 2003b. Genetic dissection of hybrid Incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. II. Mapping hybrid male sterility loci on the third chromosome. Genetics 164:1399-1418.
34. True, J. R., B. S. Weir, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142:819-837.
35. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140:389-402.
36. -. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679.
37. Wade, M. J. 2000. Interaction in metapopulations: effects on adaptation and diversity. Pp. 79-81 in C. C. Maley and E. Boudreau, eds. Artificial life VII Workshop Proceedings. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Wade, M. J., N. A. Johnson, and Y. Toquenaga. 1999. Temperature effects and genotype-by-environment interactions in hybrids: Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Evolution 53:855-865.
39. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton. 2003. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: Viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57:2286-2292.
40. Wu, C. I., and A. W. Davis. 1993. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation-the composite nature of Haldane rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142:187-212.
41. Wu, C. I., N. A. Johnson, and M. F. Palopoli. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:281-284.