Geographical variation in postzygotic isolation and its genetic basis within and between two Mimulus species

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 365, Issue 1552, 2010, Pages 2469-2478

  Martin, Noland H ^a,b   Willis, John H ^b  

^a Texas State University   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetric isolation; Bateson Dobzhansky Muller incompatibilities; Hybrid inviability; Hybrid sterility; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HYBRID; INCOMPATIBILITY; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

MIMULUS GUTTATUS; MIMULUS NASUTUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; GENETICS; GERMINATION; HYBRIDIZATION; INHERITANCE; MIMULUS; POLLEN; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CALIFORNIA; CROSSES, GENETIC; FERTILITY; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC SPECIATION; GERMINATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MIMULUS; MODELS, GENETIC; OREGON; POLLEN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77956472153     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0030     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bateson, W. 1909 Heredity and variation in modern lights. In Darwin and modern science (ed. A. C. Steward), pp. 85-101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bikard, D., Patel, D., Le Metté, C., Giorgi, V., Camilleri, C., Bennett, M. J. & Loudet, O. 2009 Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323, 623-626. (doi:10.1126/science.1165917)
3. Bomblies, K., Lempe, J., Epple, P., Warthmann, N., Lanz, C., Dangl, J. L. & Weigel, D. 2007 Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. 5, e236. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pbio.0050236)
4. Brideau, N. J., Flores, H. A., Wang, J. & Barbash, D. A. 2006 Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314, 1292-1295. (doi:10.1126/science.1133953) (Pubitemid 44846401)
5. Case, A. L. & Willis, J. H. 2008 Hybrid male sterility in Mimulus (Phrymaceae) is associated with a geographically restricted mitochondrial rearrangement. Evolution 62, 1026-1039. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00360.x) (Pubitemid 351634365)
6. Chari, J. & Wilson, P. 2001 Factors limiting hybridization between Penstemon spectabilis and P. centranthifolius. Can. J. Bot. 79, 1439-1448. (doi:10.1139/cjb-79-12-1439) (Pubitemid 34190503)
7. Charlesworth, B. 1992 Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Am. Nat. 140, 126-148. (doi:10.1086/285406)
8. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. 2004 Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
9. Darwin, C. 1859 On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London, UK: John Murray.
10. Dobzhansky, T. H. 1937 Genetics and the origin of species. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
11. Fishman, L. & Willis, J. H. 2001 Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55, 1932-1942.
12. Fishman, L. & Willis, J. H. 2006 A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 60, 1372-1381.
13. Kay, K. M. 2006 Reproductive isolation between two closely related hummingbird-pollinated neotropical gingers. Evolution 60, 538-552.
14. Lande, R. 1985 The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization. Heredity 54, 323-332. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1985.43)
15. Lowry, D. B., Modliszewski, J. L., Wright, K. M., Wu, C. A. & Willis, J. H. 2008 The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 3009-3021. (doi:10.1098/rstb. 2008.0064)
16. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998 Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
17. Martin, N. H. 2004 Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 777-782.
18. Martin, N. H. & Willis, J. H. 2007 Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61, 68-82. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2007.00006.x)
19. Mather, K. 1949 Biometrical genetics. London, UK: Methuen.
20. Matsubayashi, K. W. & Katakura, H. 2009 Contribution of multiple isolating barriers to reproductive isolation between a pair of phytophagous ladybird beetles. Evolution 63, 2563-2580. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009. 00738.x)
21. Morjan, C. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. 2004 How species evolve collectively: implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles. Mol. Ecol. 13, 1341-1356. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004. 02164.x) (Pubitemid 38688889)
22. Muller, H. J. 1940 Bearing of the 'Drosophila' work on systematics. In The new systematics (ed. J. Huxley), pp. 185-268. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Nosil, P., Vines, T. H. & Funk, D. J. 2006 Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants using divergent environments. Evolution 59, 705-719.
24. Ramsey, J., Bradshaw, H. D. & Schemske, D. W. 2003 Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57, 1520-1534.
25. Reed, L. K. & Markow, T. A. 2004 Early events in speciation: polymorphism for hybrid male sterility in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9009-9012. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0403106101) (Pubitemid 38781601)
26. Rieseberg, L. H. & Willis, J. H. 2007 Plant speciation. Science 317, 910-914. (doi:10.1126/science.1137729) (Pubitemid 47301311)
27. Schluter, D. 2001 Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 372-380. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347 (01) 02198-X)
28. Seidel, H. S., Rockman, M. V. & Kruglyak, L. 2008 Widespread genetic incompatibility in C. elegans maintained by balancing selection. Science 319, 589-594. (doi:10.1126/science.1151107) (Pubitemid 351197056)
29. Sweigart, A. L., Fishman, L. & Willis, J. H. 2006 A simple genetic incompatibility causes hybrid male sterility in Mimulus. Genetics 172, 2465-2479. (doi:10.1534/genetics.105.053686)
30. Sweigart, A. L., Mason, A. R. & Willis, J. H. 2007 Natural variation for a hybrid incompatibility between two species of Mimulus. Evolution 60, 141-151. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00011.x) (Pubitemid 46417348)
31. Vickery Jr., R. K. 1956 Data on interracial and interspecific hybridizations in the section Simiolus of the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Utah Acad. Sci. Arts. Lett. 33, 45-64.
32. Vickery Jr., R. K. 1973 Crossing barriers in the yellow monkey flowers of the genus Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 18, 52-69. (doi:10.2307/ 2406419)
33. Vickery Jr., R. K. 1978 Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol. Biol. 11, 405-507.
34. White, M. J. D. 1969 Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation in animals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 3, 75-98. (doi:10.1146/annurev. ge.03.120169.000451)
35. Whitlock, M. 2003 Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 164, 767-779.
36. Wright, S. 1941 On the probability of fixation of reciprocal translocations. Am. Nat. 74, 513-522.
37. Wu, C. A., Lowry, D. B., Cooley, A. M., Wright, K. M., Lee, Y. W. & Willis, J. H. 2008 Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100, 200-230. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy. 6801018) (Pubitemid 351156877)