A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks

Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 149-183

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Vesic, Srdjan ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857234822     PISSN: 10122443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10472-011-9271-9     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Amgoud, L., Besnard, Ph.: Bridging the gap between abstract argumentation systems and logic. In: International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'09), pp. 12-27 (2009).
2. Amgoud, L., Besnard, Ph.: A formal analysis of logic-based argumentation systems. In: International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'10), pp. 42-55 (2010).
3. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. Autom. Reason. 29(2), 125-169 (2002).
4. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34, 197-216 (2002).
5. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif. Intell. J. 173, 413-436 (2009).
6. Amgoud, L., Serrurier, M.: Agents that argue and explain classifications. J. Auton. Agents Multi-Agents Syst. 16, 187-209 (2008).
7. Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Repairing preference-based argumentation systems. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'09), pp. 665-670 (2009).
8. Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA'10), pp. 39-50 (2010).
9. Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: On the role of preferences in argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'10), pp. 219-222 (2010).
10. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., LeBerre, D.: Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'96), pp. 400-403 (1996).
11. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'00), pp. 31-38 (2000).
12. Amgoud, L., Caminada, M., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie, M. C., Prakken, H.: Towards a consensual formal model: inference part. Technical report. In: Deliverable D2. 2: Draft Formal Semantics for Inference and Decision-Making. ASPIC Project (2004).
13. Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preference-based argumentation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'08), pp. 113-123 (2008).
14. Amgoud, L., Besnard, Ph., Vesic, S.: Identifying the core of logic-based argumentation systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'11) (2011).
15. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. J. 171, 675-700 (2007).
16. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: Scc-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artif. Intell. J. 168, 162-210 (2005).
17. Bench-Capon, T. J. M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429-448 (2003).
18. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'93), pp. 411-419 (1993).
19. Besnard, Ph., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press (2008).
20. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Arguing for decisions: a qualitative model of decision making. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'96), pp. 98-105 (1996).
21. Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: an extended logical framework for default reasoning. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'89), pp. 1043-1048 (1989).
22. Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs. Artif. Intell. J. 109, 297-356 (1999).
23. Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Preferences and nonmonotonic reasoning. AI Mag. 29(4), 69-78 (2008).
24. Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell. J. 171(5-6), 286-310 (2007).
25. Caminada, M. W. A.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA'06), pp. 121-130 (2006).
26. Cayrol, C.: On the relation between argumentation and non-monotonic coherence-based entailment. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'95), pp. 1443-1448 (1995).
27. Cayrol, C., Royer, V., Saurel, C.: Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 682, 13-22 (1993).
28. Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Amgoud, L.: Extending argumentation to make good decisions. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT'09). LNCS 5783, pp. 225-236 (2009).
29. Dung, P. M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. J. 77, 321-357 (1995).
30. Dung, P. M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal skeptical argumentation. Artif. Intell. J. 171, 642-674 (2007).
31. Dunne, P.: Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints. Artif. Intell. J. 171(10-15), 701-729 (2007).
32. Elvang-Gøransson, M., Fox, J., Krause, P.: Acceptability of arguments as 'logical uncertainty'. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU'93), pp. 85-90 (1993).
33. Kaci, S.: Refined preference-based argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA'10), pp. 299-310 (2010).
34. Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values. J. of Approx. Reas. 48(3), 730-751 (2008).
35. Kaci, S., van der Torre, L., Weydert, E.: Acyclic argumentation: attack = conflict + preference. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'06), pp. 725-726 (2006).
36. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. J. Artif. Intell. 104, 1-69 (1998).
37. Martinez, G., Garcia, A., Simari, G.: On defense strength of blocking defeaters in admissible sets. In: Proceedings of KSEM'07. LNAI 4798, pp. 140-152 (2007).
38. Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. J. 173(9-10), 901-934 (2009).
39. Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: Revisiting preferences and argumentation. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'11), pp. 1021-1026 (2011).
40. Mozina, M., Zabkar, J., Bratko, I.: Argument based machine learning. Artif. Intell. J. 171(10-15), 922-937 (2007).
41. Pollock, J.: How to reason defeasibly. Artif. Intell. J. 57, 1-42 (1992).
42. Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Log. Comput. 15, 1009-1040 (2005).
43. Prakken, H.: An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. J. of Arg. and Comp. 1, 93-124 (2010).
44. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. J. Appl. Non-class. Log. 7, 25-75 (1997).
45. Rescher, N., Manor, R.: On inference from inconsistent premises. J. Theory Decis. 1, 179-219 (1970).
46. Simari, G. R., Loui, R. P.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artif. Intell. J. 53, 125-157 (1992).
47. Sycara, K.: Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory Decis. 28, 203-242 (1990).
48. Tarski, A.: On Some Fundamental Concepts of Metamathematics. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematic. Edited and Translated by J. H. Woodger. Oxford University Press (1956).