Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 665-670

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Vesic, Srdjan ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; BINARY RELATION; HANDLING INCONSISTENCIES; KNOWLEDGE BASIS; MAXIMAL ELEMENTS; PREFERENCE-BASED; REASONING MODELS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 77958586560     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J. of Automated Reasoning, 29 (2):125-169, 2002.
2. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 34:197-216, 2002.
3. L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence J., 173:413-436, 2009.
4. P. Baroni and M. Giacomin. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence J., 171:675-700, 2007.
5. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-448, 2003.
6. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In Proc. of UAI'93, pages 411-419, 1993.
7. Ph. Besnard and A. Hunter. Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, 2008.
8. G. Brewka. Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In Proc. of IJCAI-89, pages 1043-1048, 1989.
9. C. Cayrol, V. Royer, and C. Saurel. Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 682:13-22, 1993.
10. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence J., 77:321-357, 1995.
11. M. Gelfond and T.C. Son. Prioritized default theory. Lecture Notes in AI, 1471, 1997.
12. S. Modgil. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence J., 2009.
13. H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. J. of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 7:25-75, 1997.
14. G.R. Simari and R.P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence J., 53:125-157, 1992.