Making decisions through preference-based argumentation

Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 113-123

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Dimopoulos, Yannis ^b   Moraitis, Pavlos ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; ARGUMENTATION-BASED DECISION MAKING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CRITERION FORMULAS; DECISION CRITERIONS; DECISION PROCESS; INFERENCE MECHANISM; PREFERENCE-BASED;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 71549162346     PISSN: 23341025     EISSN: 23341033     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Amgoud, L., and Cayrol, C. 2002. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34:197-216.
2. Amgoud, L., and Prade, H. 2006. Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In 21st National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 16 - 20.
3. Amgoud, L. 2005. A general argumentation framework for inference and decision making. In 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI'2005, 26-33.
4. Berge, C. 1973. Graphs and Hypergraphs, North Holland Mathematical library.
5. Bonet, B., and Geffner, H. 1996. Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In 12th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 98-105.
6. Dimopoulos, Y.; Moraitis, P.; and Tsoukias, A. 2004. Argumentation based modeling of decision aiding for autonomous agents. In IEEE-WIC-ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 99-105.
7. Doutre, S. 2002. Autour de la Sémantique Préfé rées des Systèmes D'argumentation,. PhD thesis, UniversitéPaul Sabatier, Toulouse - France.
8. Dubois, D., and Prade, H. 1995. Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In 14th Inter. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 1924-1930.
9. Dung, P. M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence Journal 77:321-357.
10. Dunne, P., and Capon, T. B. 2002. Coherence in finite argument systems. Artificial Intelligence Journal 141 (1- 2):187-203.
11. Elvang-Gøransson, M.; Fox, J.; and Krause, P. 1993. Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information. In UAI'93, 114-121. Morgan-Kaufmann.
12. Fox, J., and Parsons, S. 1997. On using arguments for reasoning about actions and values. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, Stanford.
13. Gordon, T., and Brewka, G. 1994. How to buy a porsche: An approach to defeasible decision making (preliminary report). In In the workshop of Comutational Dialectics.
14. Gordon, T. F., and Karacapilidis, N. I. 1999. The Zeno Argumentation Framework. Kunstliche Intelligenz 13(3):20-29.
15. Savage, L. The Foundations of Statistics. Dover. Dover - New York, 1972.
16. Tan, S. W., and Pearl, J. 1994. Qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 928-933.