Extending argumentation to make good decisions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5783 LNAI, Issue , 2009, Pages 225-236

  Dimopoulos, Yannis ^a   Moraitis, Pavlos ^b   Amgoud, Leila ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b Huawei Technologies Co   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; AUTOMATED DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISIONS; PREFERENCE INFORMATION; PREFERENCE-BASED;

DECISION THEORY; GAME THEORY; SEMANTICS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 71549156865     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents systems, pp. 883-890 (2003)
2. Amgoud, L.: A general argumentation framework for inference and decision making. In: 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2005, pp. 26-33 (2005)
3. Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preferencebased argumentation. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR, pp. 113-123 (2008)
4. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 98-105 (1996)
5. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In: 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2006, pp. 16-20 (2006)
6. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321-357 (1995)
7. Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Amgoud, L.: Theoretical and Computational Properties of Preference-based Argumentation. In: Proc. of European Conference on AI, ECAI 2008 (2008)
8. Horty, J.: Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9, 1-28 (2001)
9. Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P.: The regime method: A new multicriteria technique. In: Hansen, P. (ed.) Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 146-155. Springer, Heidelberg (1983)
10. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1-7 (1998)
11. Hansson, B.: Choice structures and preference relations. Synthése 18, 443-458 (1968)
12. Donaldson, D., Weymark, A.: A quasiordering is the intersection of orderings. Journal of Economic Theory 178, 382-387 (1998)
13. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukias, A., Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Evaluation and Decision Models: stepping stones for the analyst. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
14. Moffett, A., Sarkar, S.: Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12, 125-137 (2006)