On the role of preferences in argumentation frameworks

Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 219-222

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Vesic, Srdjan ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION MODEL; CONFLICT FREE; INTRINSIC STRENGTH; PREFERENCE-BASED;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 78751535718     PISSN: 10823409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICTAI.2010.38     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Int., 34:197-216, 2002.
2. L. Amgoud and S. Vesic. Repairing preference-based argumentation systems. In IJCAI'09, pages 665-670, 2009.
3. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-448, 2003.
4. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade. Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In Proceedings of UAI'93, pages 411-419, 1993.
5. Y. Dimopoulos, P. Moraitis, and L. Amgoud. Extending argumentation to make good decisions. In ADT'09, pages 225-236. LNCS 5783, 2009.
6. P. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. AIJ, 77:321-357, 1995.
7. M. Elvang-Gøransson, J. Fox, and P. Krause. Acceptability of arguments as 'logical uncertainty'. In Proceedings of ECSQARU'93, number 747, pages 85-90. 1993.
8. G. Simari and R. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. AIJ, 53:125-157, 1992.