Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 730-751

  Kaci, Souhila ^a   van der Torre, Leendert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ARTOIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Argumentation theory; Non monotonic reasoning; Preferences; Value based argumentation framework

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOOLEAN FUNCTIONS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS;

ARGUMENTATION THEORIES; ELSEVIER (CO); NON-MONOTONIC; PREFERENCE ORDER; PREFERENCE REASONING; VALUE-BASED;

INTEGER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 45149118114     PISSN: 0888613X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amgoud L., and Cayrol C. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 29 2 (2002) 125-169
2. L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, D. LeBerre, Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI'96), 1996, pp. 400-403.
3. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, L. Perrussel, An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR'00), 2000, pp. 59-67.
4. K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, P. McBurney, Persuasive political argument, in: Computational Models of Natural Argument, IJCAI05's Workshop, 2005, pp. 44-51.
5. Bench-Capon T.J.M. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 3 (2003) 429-448
6. Bench-Capon T.J.M., Doutre S., and Dunne P.E. Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 171 (2007) 42-71
7. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, S. Kaci, H. Prade, Bipolar possibilistic representations, in: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'02), 2002, pp. 45-52.
8. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, H. Prade, Representing default rules in possibilistic logic, in: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92), 1992, pp. 673-684.
9. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, H. Prade, Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge base, in: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'93), 1993, pp. 411-419.
10. S. Benferhat, S. Kaci, A possibilistic logic handling of strong preferences, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Fuzzy Systems Association (IFSA'01), 2001, pp. 962-967.
11. A. Bochman, Propositional argumentation and causal reasoning, in: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'05), 2005, pp. 388-393.
12. Chorley A., and Bench-Capon T.J.M. An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2005) 323-371
13. S. Coste, C. Devred, P. Marquis, Symmetric argumentation frameworks, in: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU'05), 2005, pp. 317-328.
14. Dung P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357
15. S. Kaci, L. van der Torre, Algorithms for a nonmonotonic logic of preferences, in: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU'05), 2005, pp. 281-292.
16. S. Kaci, L. van der Torre, E. Weydert, Acyclic argumentation: Attack = conflict + preference, in: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'06), 2006, pp. 725-726.
17. J. Pearl, System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning, in: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge (TARK'90), 1990, pp. 121-135.
18. Perelman Ch. Justice, Law and Argument (1980), Reidel, Dordrecht
19. Prakken H. An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (2001) 113-133
20. Prakken H., and Sartor G. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1997) 25-75
21. Simari G.R., and Loui R.P. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992) 125-157
22. Stolzenburg F., García A.J., Chesñevar C.I., and Simari G.R. Computing generalized specificity. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 1 (2003) 87-113
23. Yager R.R. Entropy and specificity in a mathematical theory of evidence. International Journal of General Systems 9 (1983) 249-260