Teacher educators mediating curricular reform: anticipating the Australian curriculum

Teaching Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 51-69

  Briant, Elizabeth ^a   Doherty, Catherine ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

teacher education curriculum; teacher thinking and knowledge; theories of teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857073818     PISSN: 10476210     EISSN: 14701286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10476210.2011.620605     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ball, D.L. and Cohen, D. 1996. Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?. Educational Researcher, 25(9): 6-8.
2. Berlak, A. and Berlak, H. 1981. Dilemmas of schooling: Teaching and social change, New York: Methuen.
3. Bernstein, B. 1990. The structuring of pedagogic discourse, London: Routledge.
4. Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
5. Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L. and LePage, P. 2005. "Introduction". In Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L. and Bransford, J. 1-39. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brennan, M. 2009. Steering teachers: Working to control the feminized profession of education. Journal of Sociology, 54(4): 339-359.
7. Campbell, E. 2008. The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(4): 357-385.
8. Cochran-Smith, M. and Demers, K.E. 2008. "Teacher education as a bridge? Unpacking curriculum controversies". In The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction, Edited by: Connelly, F.M. 261-281. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2011). New-generation assessments of common core standards: Moving towards implementation. Retrieved June 2, 2011, fromhttp://www.acarseries.org/linda_darling_hammond.php
10. Deng, Z. and Luke, A. 2008. "Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects". In The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction, Edited by: Conelly, F.M. 66-87. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Ensor, P. 2004. "Towards a sociology of teacher education". In Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein, Edited by: Muller, J., Davies, B. and Morais, A. 153-167. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
12. Ferrari, J. (2010, October 5). Deans reject school science curriculum 'driven by expediency'. The Australian. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/deans-reject-school-science-curriculum-driven-by-expediency/story-e6frg6nf-1225934048616.
13. Grundy, S. 2005. "Junctions and disjunctions, collaboration and contestation, positions and oppositions - the strange dynamics of curriculum construction". In Curriculum developments in Australia: Promising initiatives, impasses and dead-ends, Edited by: Harris, C. and Marsh, C.J. 159-167. Deakin West, ACT: Openbook.
14. Hacker, R.G. and Rowe, M.J. 1997. The impact of a national curriculum development on teaching and learning behaviours. International Journal of Science Education, 19(9): 997-1004.
15. Healy, G. (2010, March 4). Science deans have doubts. The Australian. Retrieved September 2, 2011, fromwww.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/science-deans-have-doubts/story-e6frg6nf-1225836706893
16. Jephcote, M. and Davies, B. 2004. Recontextualizing discourse: An exploration of the workings of the meso level. Journal of Education Policy, 19(5): 547-564.
17. Johnston, R. 2007. Dominant discourses and teacher education: Current curriculum or curriculum remembered?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4): 351-365.
18. Labaree, D.F. 1997. Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1): 39-81.
19. Law, J. 2004. After method: Mess in social science research, London: Routledge.
20. Levin, B. 2008. "Curriculum policy and the politics of what should be learned in schools". In The Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction, Edited by: Connelly, F.M., He, Ming Fang and Phillion, J. 7-24. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs. (1989). The Hobart declaration on schooling. Retrieved September 2, 2011, fromwww.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/hobart_declaration,11577.html
22. Ministerial Council on Education Employment Training and Youth Affairs. (1999). Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Retrieved September 2, 2011, fromwww.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/adelaide_declaration_1999_text,28298.html
23. Morais, A.M., Neves, I.P. and Afonso, M. 2005. Teacher training processes and teachers' competence - a sociological study in the primary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21: 415-537.
24. National Curriculum Board. (2008). The shape of the national curriculum: A proposal for discussion. Retrieved September 2, 2011, fromwww.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/The_Shape_of_the_National_Curriculum_paper.pdf
25. Neves, I. and Morais, A. 2001. "Texts and contexts in educational systems: Studies of recontextualising spaces". In Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to Research, Edited by: Morais, N., Neves, I., Davies, B. and Daniels, H. Vol. 23, 223-249. New York: Peter Lang.
26. Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J. and Yang, R. 2011. Common core standards: The new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3): 103-116.
27. Reid, A. (2005. "The politics of national curriculum collaboration: How can Australia move beyond the railway gauge metaphor?". In Curriculum developments in Australia: Promising initiatives, impasses and dead-ends, Edited by: Harris, C. and Marsh, C. 39-51. Adelaide: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
28. Rizvi, F. and Lingard, B. 2010. Globalizing education policy, London: Routledge.
29. Schmidt, W., Wang, H.C. and McKnight, C. 2005. Curriculum coherence. An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5): 525-559.
30. Seddon, T. 2001. National curriculum in Australia? A matter of politics, powerful knowledge and the regulation of learning. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 9(3): 307-331.
31. Sennett, R. 2006. The culture of the new capitalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Singh, P. 2002. Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein's theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4): 571-582.
33. Snyder, I. 2008. The literacy wars: Why teaching children to read and write is a battleground in Australia, Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
34. Spillane, J.P. 1999. External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice. The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2): 143-175.
35. Swann, J. and Brown, S. 1997. The implementation of a national curriculum and teachers' classroom thinking. Research Papers in Education, 12(1): 91-114.
36. Tom, A. 1984. Teaching as a moral craft, New York: Longman.
37. Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and literature, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38. Yates, L., Collins, C. and O'Connor, K., eds. 2011. Australia's curriculum dilemmas: State cultures and the big issues, Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
39. Zeichner, K. 2009. Teacher education in the struggle for social justice, Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.
40. Zeichner, K. and Flessner, R. 2009. "Educating teachers for social justice". In Teacher education in the struggle for social justice, Edited by: Zeichner, K. 24-43. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.